You may also like...
-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 148 OF 2023 ANNA MATHEWS AND OTHERS ….. PETITIONERS VERSUS SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND OTHERS ….. RESPONDENTS W I T H WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 147 OF Judge victoriya gowri full order of sc judge is judged everyday by the lawyers, litigants and the public, as the courts are open and the judges speak by giving reasons in writing for their decisions. 13. For the aforesaid reasons, we do not find any merit in the present writ petitions and, thus, we are not inclined to entertain and issue notice. 14. The writ petitions are dismissed at the admission stage. ………………………………..J. (SANJIV KHANNA) ………………………………..J. (B.R. GAVAI) NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 10, 2023.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 11, 2023
-
In the result, this writ petition stands allowed and the impugned order dated 15.04.2025 is hereby quashed. It is made clear that the 2nd respondent is at liberty to fill up the 35 vacancies, as notified in their Notification dated 26.10.2021. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected WMPs are also closed. 16-07-2025 (2/2) kmi Index:Yes Speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Secretary To Government, Health And Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Medical Service Recruitment Board Represented By Its Member Secretary, DMS Building, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 106. 3.The Director Indian Medicine And Homoeopathy, Chennai 600 106. C.KUMARAPPAN J. kmi WP No. 16777 of 2025 AND WMP NOS.19019 & 19018 OF 2025 16-07 
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 20, 2025
-
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS* *W.P.(Crl.)No.1464 of 2025* *Date of Order: 27.11.2025* A.Arunkumar … Petitioner *Vs.* *The Home Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009 & Ors. … Respondents* *Hon’ble Judge:* MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA *Counsel for Petitioner:* Mr.A.Arunkumar (Party-in-Person) *Counsel for Respondents:* Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Additional Public Prosecutor *Court Observation:* The court directed the respondents to grant permission to the petitioner and his party members to pay homage to Dr. Ambedkar on his 69th death anniversary, subject to the conditions mentioned in the Affidavit of Undertaking filed by the petitioner, including not placing banners with photoshopped images of Dr. Ambedkar and maintaining peace and order.
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 2, 2025