Follow:
- Next story Pg medical case order modified today mhc
- Previous story மருத்துவர் உடலை அடக்கம் செய்ய எதிர்ப்பு தெரிவித்து கைதான 5 பேர் ஜாமின் கோரி மனு
Recent Posts
- Supreme Court on Friday called for status reports from the Central Bureau of Investigation(CBI) and the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) with respect to their ongoing investigation into the alleged bank frauds
- MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W. P.No.12808 of 2024and W.M.P.No.13982 of 2024 The Management of Pennar Industries Limited
- Madurai High Court has stayed a government order allowing conversion of non-religious buildings without NOC (No Objection Certificate). The court ruled that the order was illegal and stayed it, citing concerns about potential misuse and impact on local planning norms.
- The Supreme Court imposed a cost of ₹25,000 on the Central government for providing incorrect information.
- Justice G Jayachandran and Justice KK Ramakrishnan set aside an order passed by the Member Secretary of the Model School, calling for certain information of students. The court noted that the information was sensitive and there was no explanation
More
Recent Posts
- Supreme Court on Friday called for status reports from the Central Bureau of Investigation(CBI) and the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) with respect to their ongoing investigation into the alleged bank frauds
- MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W. P.No.12808 of 2024and W.M.P.No.13982 of 2024 The Management of Pennar Industries Limited
- Madurai High Court has stayed a government order allowing conversion of non-religious buildings without NOC (No Objection Certificate). The court ruled that the order was illegal and stayed it, citing concerns about potential misuse and impact on local planning norms.
- The Supreme Court imposed a cost of ₹25,000 on the Central government for providing incorrect information.
- Justice G Jayachandran and Justice KK Ramakrishnan set aside an order passed by the Member Secretary of the Model School, calling for certain information of students. The court noted that the information was sensitive and there was no explanation