Follow:
- Next story The recovery by the government was based on adjusted gross revenue of about ₹92,000 crore. The Supreme Court on Friday directed the managing directors and directors of telcos and other firms to explain why contempt action be not taken against them for non-compliance of its order to pay adjusted gross revenue (AGR) of ₹1.47 lakh crore to the Department of Telecommunications.
- Previous story The Madras High Court on Monday asked the State government as to what steps have been taken for the rehabilitation of the families of manual scavengers, apart from payment of compensation to bereaved families. The bench of Chief Justice AP Sahi and Justice Subramonium Prasad has asked the state to file its response within two months.
Recent Posts
- SC *refused urgent listing* of Cockroach Janta Party PIL. CJI remark: _“Don’t take it sentimentally.”_ This is *PIL Jurisprudence + Art 32 Filter*. Key for *HJS, Law Officer, Constitutional Law*.
- Breaking: _PIL in SC to Probe “Cockroach Janta Party” + Fake Law Degrees_
- Supreme Court has reiterated that the mere non-registration of a will cannot be treated as a circumstance casting suspicion on its genuineness, emphasizing that Indian law does not mandate registration of wills
- Pmla case anitha radakrishnan
- Justice Pugalendhi noted that both the high court and the Supreme Court, in similar petitions, have recognised the labour inspector’s right to confer permanent status on eligible employees.
More
Recent Posts
- SC *refused urgent listing* of Cockroach Janta Party PIL. CJI remark: _“Don’t take it sentimentally.”_ This is *PIL Jurisprudence + Art 32 Filter*. Key for *HJS, Law Officer, Constitutional Law*.
- Breaking: _PIL in SC to Probe “Cockroach Janta Party” + Fake Law Degrees_
- Supreme Court has reiterated that the mere non-registration of a will cannot be treated as a circumstance casting suspicion on its genuineness, emphasizing that Indian law does not mandate registration of wills
- Pmla case anitha radakrishnan
- Justice Pugalendhi noted that both the high court and the Supreme Court, in similar petitions, have recognised the labour inspector’s right to confer permanent status on eligible employees.