You may also like...
-
MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.No.11813 of 2020 and W.M.P.Nos.14526 & 14524 of 2020 promotion order full order
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 29, 2020
-
Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers (Applicant/Defendant) – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja (Respondent/Plaintiff) – *Case No:* C.S.(Comm.Div) No. 226 of 2025 – *Application No:* (link unavailable) 4570 of 2025 – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Applicant/Defendant: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan – Respondent/Plaintiff: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj – *Court Observation:* The court dismissed the applicant’s application, holding that the respondent/plaintiff is entitled to protect his musical works from distortion or unauthorized exploitation. The validity of the transfer of rights in favor of the applicant is a triable issue to be examined during trial.
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 3, 2025
-
16:59] sekarreporter1: “Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan observed, “The expression ‘betting and gambling’ cannot be split to mean that the staking angle alone would amount to betting whereas the risk angle” https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/state-of-tamil-nadu-v-junglee-games-india-pvt-ltd-2026-insc-594-banning-online-rummy-poker
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 30, 2026