ஆதார் அட்டையின் நகலைத் தந்தால்தான் மது என்ற ஆணைக்கும் தடை. எந்த வழிவகைகளில் மது விற்கலாம் என்பதை அரசு் தீர்மானிக்க வேண்டும்
ஆதார் அட்டையின் நகலைத் தந்தால்தான் மது என்ற ஆணைக்கும் தடை. எந்த வழிவகைகளில் மது விற்கலாம் என்பதை அரசு் தீர்மானிக்க வேண்டும்
Follow:
- Next story 1: Madras HC dismisses as withdrawn a PIL filed against conduct of Class X board exams in TN from June 1 [5/15, 13:28] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁
- Previous story ஆதார் அட்டையின் நகலைத் தந்தால்தான் மது என்ற ஆணைக்கும் தடை. எந்த வழிவகைகளில் மது விற்கலாம் என்பதை அரசு் தீர்மானிக்க வேண்டும்
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
More
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
