Follow:
- Next story PF benefits should be extended to contractual employees, rules Supreme Court
- Previous story [1/20, 12:52] sekarreporter1: Supreme Court declines stay on electoral bonds scheme: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-declines-stay-on-electoral-bonds-scheme/article30605530.ece [1/20, 12:52] sekarreporter1: Apex court asks EC to file reply in a fortnight. Chief Justice of India Sharad A. Bobde made it clear orally on January 20 that if the Supreme Court had earlier found it unnecessary to stay the electoral bonds scheme, the court may not stay the scheme even now. The comments came on a fervent plea by advocates Prashant Bhushan and Shadan Farasat that new facts had come up, indicating that the scheme was being frequently opened to allow funds to fill the coffers of the ruling party.
Recent Posts
- Vinothpandian: Madras high court : WP no 25436 of 2025 dated 19th nov 2025 : M/s dugar vs IG registration : surcharge cannot be levied on a sale certificate under Tamil Nadu duty on transfer of property in municipal areas when it is presented for registration , sale certificate is not an instrument
- Police personnel should not act as “human machines” & end up using excessive force, says Justice M Nirmal Kumar while quashing cases booked against some police constables & many lawyers for the 2009 violence between them inside the HC campus. @THChennai
- Arbitral Tribunal Doesn’t Have Jurisdiction To Lift Corporate Veil As It’s Confined By Arbitration Agreement: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court/sugesan-transport-pvt-ltd-v-ec-bose-company-pvt-ltd-2025-mhc-2699-corporate-veil-arbitration-1599366 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- Sitting Arrangements – From December 01, 2025 Sl. No Hon’ble Judges Subject 1 The Hon’ble The Chief Justice and G.Arul Murugan, J
- Hon’ble Mr.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and The Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.JOTHIRAMAN R.T.No.1 of 2025 and Crl.A.No.1744 of 2025 R.T.No.1 of 2025 : The Sessions Judge,
More
Recent Posts
- Vinothpandian: Madras high court : WP no 25436 of 2025 dated 19th nov 2025 : M/s dugar vs IG registration : surcharge cannot be levied on a sale certificate under Tamil Nadu duty on transfer of property in municipal areas when it is presented for registration , sale certificate is not an instrument
- Police personnel should not act as “human machines” & end up using excessive force, says Justice M Nirmal Kumar while quashing cases booked against some police constables & many lawyers for the 2009 violence between them inside the HC campus. @THChennai
- Arbitral Tribunal Doesn’t Have Jurisdiction To Lift Corporate Veil As It’s Confined By Arbitration Agreement: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court/sugesan-transport-pvt-ltd-v-ec-bose-company-pvt-ltd-2025-mhc-2699-corporate-veil-arbitration-1599366 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- Sitting Arrangements – From December 01, 2025 Sl. No Hon’ble Judges Subject 1 The Hon’ble The Chief Justice and G.Arul Murugan, J
- Hon’ble Mr.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and The Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.JOTHIRAMAN R.T.No.1 of 2025 and Crl.A.No.1744 of 2025 R.T.No.1 of 2025 : The Sessions Judge,