] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : kridhan infrastructure pvt ltd vs Venkatesan sankaranaryanan civil appeal no 3299 of 2020 dated 1- 03- 2021 : Time is crucial facet of scheme under IBC , to allow such proceedings to lapse into indefinite delay will plainly defeat object of statute [3/11, 05:51] Vinothpandian: 2019

[3/11, 05:51] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : kridhan infrastructure pvt ltd vs Venkatesan sankaranaryanan civil appeal no 3299 of 2020 dated 1- 03- 2021 : Time is crucial facet of scheme under IBC , to allow such proceedings to lapse into indefinite delay will plainly defeat object of statute
[3/11, 05:51] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
[3/11, 05:51] Vinothpandian: 2019 (266) DLT 305 : university of delhi vs union of india : In a condonation of delay application , a liberal approach should be taken , however condonation of long delay should not be automatic , therefore routine explanation not enough , sufficient cause has to be shown to justify the delay