Vinothpandian: Supreme Court : civil appeal no 2483 of 2014 dated 9th Oct 2025. ( canara bank vs KL Rajgarhia : Agreement to sell for construction of flats found to be unenforceable due to violation of building laws and regulations , doctrine of severability does not permit courts to alter essential terms or object of the contract ( contract act 1872 section 23 )

[03/11, 11:52] Vinothpandian: Supreme Court : civil appeal no 2483 of 2014 dated 9th Oct 2025. ( canara bank vs KL Rajgarhia : Agreement to sell for construction of flats found to be unenforceable due to violation of building laws and regulations , doctrine of severability does not permit courts to alter essential terms or object of the contract ( contract act 1872 section 23 )
[03/11, 11:52] Vinothpandian: Supreme Court: criminal appeal no 2572 of 2023 dated 9th Oct 2025 srinivasan vs state rep by inspector of police : In cases involving heinous offences under the POCSO act , the court must assess the evidence objectively and not be swayed by emotional appeals or ignore inconsistencies and contradictions in the prosecution s story
[03/11, 11:52] Vinothpandian: Supreme Court: criminal appeal no 679 of 2024 dated 28th Oct 2025 : k kirubakaran vs state of tamil Nadu: In exceptional and unique circumstances , the Supreme Court can invoke it’s powers under article 142 of the constitution of India to quash criminal proceedings against a convicted appellant considering factors such as matrimonial harmony , the welfare of the victim and societal interest

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version