Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 534 : Roshan narayanan CS vs authorised officer , central bank of india : An application preferred by any person including borrower against any steps taken by secured creditor that i

[9/8, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 534 : Roshan narayanan CS vs authorised officer , central bank of india : An application preferred by any person including borrower against any steps taken by secured creditor that is designed to deprive said person of any constituent of proprietory right envisaged in sec 13(4)(a) of SARFASI would be maintainable under sec 17 of SARFASI act
[9/8, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) DRTC 727 : manorama mohanty vs Authorised officer , urban cooperative bank ltd : Held cooperative bank can enforce security interest created in favour of bank by the loanee under sec 13 of SARFASI act
[9/8, 10:47] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) DRTC 761 : Ratan kumar & others vs state bank of india : Borrower restrained from dealing with mortgaged assets after being proceeded against him by issuance of notice under sec 13 ( 2) of the SARFASI act , any third party right created after issusnce of notice under sec 13(2) has to be ignored
[9/8, 10:47] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) DRTC 761 : Ratan kumar & others vs state bank of india : Borrower restrained from dealing with mortgaged assets after being proceeded against him by issuance of notice under sec 13 ( 2) of the SARFASI act , any third party right created after issusnce of notice under sec 13(2) has to be ignored
[9/8, 14:32] Vinothpandian: 2007 (4) crimes 140 : Ramesh Baburao devaskar vs state of maharastra : A cryptic message given on telephone by somebody who does not disclose his idenity may not satisfy the requirement of sec 154 of CRPC

You may also like...