Vinothpandian: 2017 (1) DRTC 405 : loveleen kaur & another vs ICICI bank ltd : Interim orders must be based on application of principles of equity and prima facie case being established

[1/12, 14:56] Vinothpandian: 2017 (1) DRTC 405 : loveleen kaur & another vs ICICI bank ltd : Interim orders must be based on application of principles of equity and prima facie case being established
[1/12, 14:56] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 594 : deepak apparels pvt ltd vs city union bank ltd : finding recorded by high court on special facts and circumstances of case cannot be a binding precedent
[1/12, 14:56] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 532 : bhopal thapa vs bina boro : Existence of fraudulent act can override bar imposed under sec 34 of the SARFASI.act as well as under sec 18 of the RDDBFI.act 1993 , disputed facts on fraud cannot be decided by debts recovery tribunal
[1/12, 15:08] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 166 : J Rajiv subramaniyan & another vs pandiyas : sale by any method other than public auction or public tender , no terms settled in writing between parties that sale can be effected by private treaty ( sec 13(8) SARFASI act )
[1/12, 15:08] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 836 : HDFC bank ltd mumbai vs prestige educational trust : section 13 (4) of the SARFASI.act not conferred any power on secured creditor to take possession of any assets other than secured assets , if attempted its ultravires to provisions of act

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME