Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) SCC 520 : Anita malhotra vs Apparel export promotion council : certified copy of a annual return of a company is a public document ( section 74 evidence act 1872 )

[1/24, 16:19] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) SCC 520 : Anita malhotra vs Apparel export promotion council : certified copy of a annual return of a company is a public document ( section 74 evidence act 1872 )
[1/24, 16:19] Vinothpandian: 2017 (1) CCC 532 : Buddha jagadeeswara rao vs sri ravi enterprises : courts obliged to intimate registrar office after cancellation of an instrument of transfer of any immovable property , section.49 of the indian registration act permits admission of unregistered documents in evidence for collateral purposes , but it should be duly stamped
[1/24, 16:19] Vinothpandian: 2011 (1) crimes 294 : Achuthanandan vs R Balakrishna pillai : In a corruption case appellate court has full power to review , re appreciate and reconsider the evidence upon which if an acquittal order is founded , criminal procedure code put no restrictions , however appellate court must bear in mind that in cases of acquittal , there is double presumption in favour of the accused
[1/24, 16:19] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MWN ( cr ) 491 : Mahipal vs Rajesh kumar SC : mere recording of ” having perused the record ” and ” on facts and circumstances of case does not subserve purpose of reasoned order , non – furnishing of reasons leads to presumption of non – application of mind warranting interference ( sec 439 CRPC 1973 )
[1/24, 16:19] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) CTC 442 : nissan motors corporate office vs S giri prasad : With regard to summoning of an accused in a criminal case , order must reflect about application of mind to facts of case and law applicable thereto , when magistrate did not record basis of taking cognizance and simply ordered to issue summons to accused , complaint held liable to be quashed
[1/24, 16:19] Vinothpandian: 2013(1) DRTC 761 : Ratan kumar & others vs state bank of india : Any third party right created after issuance of notice under section 13(2) of SARFASI act has to be ignored
[1/24, 16:19] Vinothpandian: 2012 (8) SCC 537 : state of UP vs sanjay kumar : life imprisonment cannot be equivalent to imprisonment for 14 years or 20 years , rather it always meant as the whole natural life
[1/24, 16:19] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) CTC 481 : Abul kalam azad AL vs AL jawaharlal rep by its power agent A sowkath ALi : Award of lok adalat can be challenged only by filing writ petition under art 226 or 227 of constitution on very limited grounds

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Call Now ButtonCALL ME