Follow:
- Next story *Vijay Mallya Cannot Cite Cases Pending In India To Stall Insolvency Proceedings Abroad, Clarifies SC* https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/vijay-mallya-cannot-cite-cases-pending-in-india-to-stall-insolvency-proceedings-abroad-clarifies-sc-151316
- Previous story advocate N R R Arun Natarajan, in a “statement on behalf of Mrs and Mr Karti P Chidambaram,” said no cash was received in the sale transaction.
Recent Posts
- Appavu case advt A.Saravanan interview
- Contempt action: Lawyers seek Madurai magistrate’s removal The demonstration witnessed a brief confrontation between the advocates and the police at the High Court main entrance when a section of them forcibly entered the campus.
- Judge kumaresh babu/Madras HC upholds Rs.10.01 lakh damages against Sun TV for airing 1996 Veerappan interview with defamatory remarks against actress Sukanya: “Broadcaster had power to edit, failed to verify, regret in third-party magazine ≠ apology. Malice proved.”*
- Section 164 CrPC Statement Can Be Used For POCSO Conviction Where Victim Turns Hostile But Admits Signature & Does Not Allege Coercion: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/murugan-v-state-rep-by-inspector-of-police-2026mhc1907-pocso-section-164-1615412 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- sekarreporter1: “Justice L. Victoria Gowri passed the order while allowing a petition filed by Thomas @ Dhamas and Lingabalan seeking quashing of proceedings pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi. The case was registered under Sections 294(b), 341, 353 and 506(ii) of the Indian” https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/criminal-law-cannot-silence-citizens-for-questioning-police-action-madras-high-court-quashes-fir-1598988#:~:text=Justice%20L.%20Victoria%20Gowri%20passed%20the%20order%20while%20allowing%20a%20petition%20filed%20by%20Thomas%20%40%20Dhamas%20and%20Lingabalan%20seeking%20quashing%20of%20proceedings%20pending%20before%20the%20Judicial%20Magistrate%2C%20Paramakudi.%20The%20case%20was%20registered%20under%20Sections%20294(b)%2C%20341%2C%20353%20and%20506(ii)%20of%20the%20Indian
More
Recent Posts
- Appavu case advt A.Saravanan interview
- Contempt action: Lawyers seek Madurai magistrate’s removal The demonstration witnessed a brief confrontation between the advocates and the police at the High Court main entrance when a section of them forcibly entered the campus.
- Judge kumaresh babu/Madras HC upholds Rs.10.01 lakh damages against Sun TV for airing 1996 Veerappan interview with defamatory remarks against actress Sukanya: “Broadcaster had power to edit, failed to verify, regret in third-party magazine ≠ apology. Malice proved.”*
- Section 164 CrPC Statement Can Be Used For POCSO Conviction Where Victim Turns Hostile But Admits Signature & Does Not Allege Coercion: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/murugan-v-state-rep-by-inspector-of-police-2026mhc1907-pocso-section-164-1615412 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- sekarreporter1: “Justice L. Victoria Gowri passed the order while allowing a petition filed by Thomas @ Dhamas and Lingabalan seeking quashing of proceedings pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi. The case was registered under Sections 294(b), 341, 353 and 506(ii) of the Indian” https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/criminal-law-cannot-silence-citizens-for-questioning-police-action-madras-high-court-quashes-fir-1598988#:~:text=Justice%20L.%20Victoria%20Gowri%20passed%20the%20order%20while%20allowing%20a%20petition%20filed%20by%20Thomas%20%40%20Dhamas%20and%20Lingabalan%20seeking%20quashing%20of%20proceedings%20pending%20before%20the%20Judicial%20Magistrate%2C%20Paramakudi.%20The%20case%20was%20registered%20under%20Sections%20294(b)%2C%20341%2C%20353%20and%20506(ii)%20of%20the%20Indian