Follow:
- Next story [3/3, 19:42] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 19:38] Sekarreporter 1: Tomorrow full bench [3/3, 19:38] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 19:33] Yamunadevi Advt: Very Proud moment ๐๐๐๐๐น๐โค๐ [3/3, 19:33] Sekarreporter 1: ๐๐๐ [3/3, 19:51] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 19:50] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1234845942278283264?s=08 [3/3, 19:50] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 19:49] Patty Jeganathan Mhc Advt: Sekar, congrats and wish all successful to our women judges. [3/3, 19:49] Sekarreporter 1: ๐๐๐ [3/3, 20:22] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 20:21] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1234853696183439362?s=08 [3/3, 20:21] Sekarreporter 1: Educational institute esi เฎชเฏเฎฐเฏเฎจเฏเฎคเฏเฎฎเฎพ ? Refter by cj bench Question of law refer to full bench three women judges https://t.co/CIyZ7lGXCy [3/3, 20:26] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 20:26] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1234855028738883585?s=08 [3/3, 20:26] Sekarreporter 1: 3 เฎชเฏเฎฃเฏ เฎจเฏเฎคเฎฟเฎชเฎคเฎฟเฎเฎณเฏ เฎฎเฏเฎฉเฏเฎชเฏ เฎจเฎพเฎณเฏ เฎเฎเฎฐเฎพเฎเฎฟ เฎเฎฒเฏเฎตเฎฟ เฎจเฎฟเฎฑเฏเฎตเฎฉเฎ.เฎเฎณเฏ เฎเฎพเฎฐเฏเฎชเฎพเฎ เฎตเฎพเฎคเฎพเฎเฏเฎเฎฟเฎฑเฎพเฎฐ.advt Vijayananth esi not applicable to educational institution เฎเฎฉเฏเฎเฎฟเฎฑเฎพเฎฐเฏ
- Previous story Sekarreporter 1: https://www.india-briefing.com/news/maternity-leave-india-law-benefits-10294.html/ [3/3, 19:26] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 19:19] Srinivasa Moorrhy Mhc Advt: Sir with great respect to you and kcj i would clarify the issue.
Recent Posts
- The Supreme Court today(October 31) allowed an intervention filed by the Criminal Justice and Police Accountability Project, arguing that the State of Madhya Pradesh has violated the 2024 Sukanya Shantha judgment through its Madhya Pradesh Sudharatmak Sevayen Evam Bandigrah Adhiniyam, 2024, in the suo moto matter concerning discrimination inside prisons #SupremeCourt
- While hearing an anticipatory bail matter, the Court today orally remarked that the notice should not be served through social media platforms such as WhatsApp or Twitter.
- While hearing an anticipatory bail matter, the Court today orally remarked that the notice should not be served through social media platforms such as WhatsApp or Twitter.
- The Madras High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by retired IPS officer G Sampath Kumar against a single judge order refusing to reject a defamation suit filed by cricketer MS Dhoni against the IPS officer and others.
- The Supreme Court on Friday (October 31) delivered a key ruling under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, clarifying that while mere delay in pronouncing an arbitral award does not invalidate it, an inordinate and unexplained delay making the decision ineffective or unworkable can render the award void.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
More
Recent Posts
- The Supreme Court today(October 31) allowed an intervention filed by the Criminal Justice and Police Accountability Project, arguing that the State of Madhya Pradesh has violated the 2024 Sukanya Shantha judgment through its Madhya Pradesh Sudharatmak Sevayen Evam Bandigrah Adhiniyam, 2024, in the suo moto matter concerning discrimination inside prisons #SupremeCourt
- While hearing an anticipatory bail matter, the Court today orally remarked that the notice should not be served through social media platforms such as WhatsApp or Twitter.
- While hearing an anticipatory bail matter, the Court today orally remarked that the notice should not be served through social media platforms such as WhatsApp or Twitter.
- The Madras High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by retired IPS officer G Sampath Kumar against a single judge order refusing to reject a defamation suit filed by cricketer MS Dhoni against the IPS officer and others.
- The Supreme Court on Friday (October 31) delivered a key ruling under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, clarifying that while mere delay in pronouncing an arbitral award does not invalidate it, an inordinate and unexplained delay making the decision ineffective or unworkable can render the award void.