You may also like...
-
Justice M Dhandapani said that petitioner L Nagaraj worked as assistant executive engineer in the department for more than 33 years and retired without any blemish. Hence, the charge memo issued against him after his retirement is unsustainable. He was working in Tangedco at Pugalur in Trichy district and retired from service on June 30, 2014. After the petitioner’s retirement, there was a family dispute between the petitioner and his second son-in-law Vijaya Kumar.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 22, 2021
-
Madras high court orders october 14th mam case , mhaa case 7.5% case
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 15, 2022
-
சபரிமலை கோவில் வழக்கில் மறுஆய்வு மனுக்கள் மீது மட்டுமே சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டு விசாரணை நடத்த வேண்டும் – வக்கீல்கள் வாதம்
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 4, 2020