You may also like...
-
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN WP.No.3264/2016 Alstom T&D India Limited. # The writ petition will stand allowed. The order impugned is set aside. There will be a direction to the respondents to issue the relevant benefit under the current scheme known as ”Merchandise Exports from India” Scheme formerly known as ”DFCE Scheme/Target Plus Scheme” to the petitioner as claimed by the petitioner. No costs.
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 15, 2022
-
GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* CRL. O.P. NOS. 3730, 4227, 4095 & 11206 OF 2021 CRL. M.P. NOS. 6647, 6649, 2218, 2601, 2679, 3388, 6708 & 6709 OF 2021 W.P. NO. 1397 OF 2021 AND W.M.P. NO. 5917 OF 2021 *THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI* THE HONOURABLE HIGH OF MADRAS QUASHED
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 12, 2021
-
Case quashed The Madras High Court had ordered Vijay Sethupathi Film Company, Maithiri Movie Makers who produced the Telugu film, and director Bhujji Babu Sana to respond to the case filed by Prabhu Dalhousie. The case came up for hearing today before Judge C Saravanan. At the time of hearing Narmada Sampath appeared on behalf of Vijay Sethupathi ,moved Application to Strike out the Plaint against Mr.Vijay Sethupathi .she submited as far as his case is concerned , the main contentions were that there is no cause of aution against mr. vijay sethupathi and entire pleadings in the plaint are based on a the news paper report which again reiterates a fact that based on a source it is believed that vijay sethupathi has purchased the copy rights of Tamil version of uppena movie. Apart from that no other material records have been filed to substantiate the claim of the plaint against mr. vijay sethupathi she added. After hearing the submissions judge allowed the strike out petition to strike off the plaint against mr. vijay sethupathi And the case id posted tomorrow for other defendants submission
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 19, 2022
