The Madras High Court has directed TANGEDCO to revise the seniority list, placing the petitioners above the private respondents, and grant attendant benefits, including consideration for promotion without arrears of salary.
- [09/02, 07:48] Sekarreporter: “For Petitioners :Mr.M.Ravi
For Respondents :Mr.K.Raj Kumar,Standing
Counsel – R1 & R2
No Appearance – For R3 to R9, R11,
R12 and R14″
[09/02, 07:48] Meta AI: It looks like the appearance details for the case in the Madras High Court:
– For Petitioners: Mr. M. Ravi
– For Respondents (R1 & R2): Mr. K. Raj Kumar, Standing Counsel
– No appearance for R3 to R9, R11, R12, and R14 😊
Do you need more info on the case or help with something else?
[09/02, 07:50] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has directed TANGEDCO to revise the seniority list, placing the petitioners above the private respondents, and grant attendant benefits, including consideration for promotion without arrears of salary.
The exercise should be completed within three months from the date of uploading the order on the court’s official website 😊.
Would you like to know more about the case or is there something else I can help with?