The Judges of the Supreme Court are appointed under Article 124 of Constitution, which do not provide for any reservation based on caste or class of person including women,” Law Minister Ravi Shanker Prasad said.

Live Law
Top StoriesNews UpdatesColumnsInterviewsForeign/InternationalRTIKnow the LawLaw School CornerLawyers & Law FirmsJob UpdatesBook ReviewsEvents CornerVideosSponsoredContact UsAdvertise with UsRound Ups
Home > News Updates > Govt Has Requested To…
Govt Has Requested To Consider Members From SC/ ST/ OBC Communities, Minorities & Women For Appointment as HC Judges: Law Ministry
By – LIVELAW NEWS NETWORKUpdate: 2020-10-20 07:12 GMT
Govt Has Requested To Consider Members From SC/ ST/ OBC Communities, Minorities & Women For Appointment as HC Judges: Law Ministry

In response to concerns over inadequate representation of minorities/ vulnerable communities at the Bench in Supreme Court, the Union Law Ministry has reiterated that there is no provision for reservation in the Judiciary.
However, he clarified that the Government has been insisting on increasing diversity at the High Court level, from where Judges at the Top Court are usually appointed.

“The Judges of the Supreme Court are appointed under Article 124 of Constitution, which do not provide for any reservation based on caste or class of person including women,” Law Minister Ravi Shanker Prasad said.

The Minister was responding to the concern raised by a Member of Parliament, P. Wilson, in the RajyaSabha.

Wilson had highlighted that for the past few years, there is declining representation from all the sections of the society in the Apex Court.

“A more diverse judiciary is desirable because without one, the chances are greatly increased for a violation of the rights on these under represented and could indirectly imply discrimination. Significant over-representation of certain sections calls into question the objectivity of the current system and its inability to recruit from different social social groups and ensure social justice,” he wrote while urging the Parliament to “step in”.

The Law Minister has now clarified that at present, there are 30 judges at the Supreme Court including two women judges, three judges from minority communities and one judge from Scheduled Caste community are in position in the Supreme Court.

He further stated that judges in the Supreme Court are appointed predominantly from amongst the Chief Justices / Judges of the High Courts and the Government has been requesting that due consideration be given to suitable candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, other Backward Classes, Minorities and Women while making appointments to the High Courts.

Wilson’s letter on the other hand stated,

“There is a diversity deficit in our Supreme Court and is not indicative of the wonderfully diverse and pluralistic society of India. Judicial diversity is fundamental to the quality of judging. Many social groups are poorly represented in the Apex court. There is lack of women judges and judges from historically oppressed and marginalized sections of society. It is not that they are not qualified enough. This may mean their rights are not being properly safeguarded, and may eventually lead to the infringement and violation of such rights. People of this country are afraid that a very narrow, homogeneous group of Judges belonging to certain classes are not necessarily going to reflect the views and values of society as a whole, particularly on issues involving diverse, cultural and generational matters because they would require more perspectives, as the Judges would interpret and enforce law based on their own background.”

Click Here To Download Wilson’s Letter

Click Here To Download Ministry’s Response

Tags:
Judicial Diversity Women In Judiciary SC/ST Reservation In Judiciary Union Law Ministry P Wilson

NHRC Issues Human Rights Advisory For Protection Of LGBTQI+ Rights Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
Karnataka HC Seeks Govt Response On Plea Seeking Horizontal Reservation For Transgenders Instead Of OBC Reservation
Delhi Court Takes Cognizance Of Offences Under Prevention Of Money Laundering Act, Against Delhi Riots Accused Tahir Hussain [Read Order]
[Order 23 Rule 3] Statements Recorded Before Court Hold Equal Sanctity As A Written Instrument Of Compromise: P&H HC [Read Order]
Delhi HC Reserves Order In Suo Moto Matter Concerning Blanket Order On Extending Interim Bail and Parole Granted In Light of COVID19
Orissa HC Disposes About 25,000 Cases During COVID-19 Pandemic [Read Press Note]
[Dheeraj Mor Judgment Vs HC Rules] Kerala HC Grants Certificate For Appeal To SC While Quashing Appointment Of A District Judge [Read Judgment]
[Scoring Zero In NEET Exam] Bombay HC Issues Notice In Plea By NEET Aspirant Seeking Manual Evaluation Of Her OMR Sheet [Read Order]
Consider Allowing Lawyers To Board Local Trains For Professional Work Not Related To Court Proceedings: Bombay HC To State [Read Order]
“They Have Married And Are Living Happily”: Allahabad HC Quashes A Rape Case From Hathras Recording Settlement [Read Order]
‘Judge Is Required To Be Dispassionate’ : Karnataka HC Advises Trial Judges To Not Get Morally Swayed While Trying Heinous Offences
Similar News
NHRC Issues Human Rights Advisory For Protection Of LGBTQI+ Rights Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
NHRC Issues Human Rights Advisory For Protection Of LGBTQI+ Rights Amid COVID-19 Pandemic2020-10-20 12:26 GMT
Karnataka HC Seeks Govt Response On Plea Seeking Horizontal Reservation For Transgenders Instead Of OBC Reservation
Karnataka HC Seeks Govt Response On Plea Seeking Horizontal Reservation For Transgenders Instead Of OBC Reservation2020-10-20 11:23 GMT
Delhi Court Takes Cognizance Of Offences Under Prevention Of Money Laundering Act, Against Delhi Riots Accused Tahir Hussain [Read Order]
Delhi Court Takes Cognizance Of Offences Under Prevention Of Money Laundering Act, Against Delhi Riots Accused Tahir Hussain [Read Order]2020-10-20 08:42 GMT
[Order 23 Rule 3] Statements Recorded Before Court Hold Equal Sanctity As A Written Instrument Of Compromise: P&H HC [Read Order]
[Order 23 Rule 3] Statements Recorded Before Court Hold Equal Sanctity As A Written Instrument Of Compromise: P&H HC [Read Order]2020-10-20 07:42 GMT
Delhi HC Reserves Order In Suo Moto Matter Concerning Blanket Order On Extending Interim Bail and Parole Granted In Light of COVID192020-10-20 07:07 GMT
Orissa HC Disposes About 25,000 Cases During COVID-19 Pandemic [Read Press Note]2020-10-20 06:47 GMT
[Dheeraj Mor Judgment Vs HC Rules] Kerala HC Grants Certificate For Appeal To SC While Quashing Appointment Of A District Judge [Read Judgment]2020-10-20 06:30 GMT
[Scoring Zero In NEET Exam] Bombay HC Issues Notice In Plea By NEET Aspirant Seeking Manual Evaluation Of Her OMR Sheet [Read Order]2020-10-20 05:44 GMT
Consider Allowing Lawyers To Board Local Trains For Professional Work Not Related To Court Proceedings: Bombay HC To State [Read Order]2020-10-20 05:31 GMT
“They Have Married And Are Living Happily”: Allahabad HC Quashes A Rape Case From Hathras Recording Settlement [Read Order]2020-10-20 05:16 GMT
‘Judge Is Required To Be Dispassionate’ : Karnataka HC Advises Trial Judges To Not Get Morally Swayed While Trying Heinous Offences2020-10-20 05:15 GMT
Follow:
Copyright © 2020.Powered by Hocalwire

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com