Power of annauniversity upheld cj bench

[10/20, 17:37] Sekarreporter 1: W.A.Nos.940, 941, 942 and 945 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 08.10.2020
DELIVERED ON : 13.10.2020
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MR.A.P.SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.A.Nos.940, 941, 942 and 945 of 2020
and C.M.P.Nos.11436, 11425, 11427 and 11432 of 2020
W.A.No.940 of 2020:
The Anna University
rep. by its Registrar
Guindy, Chennai – 600 025. .. Appellant
vs.
1. ARS College of Engineering
Rep. by its Chairman
Sattamangalam, Maraimalai Nagar
Chengalpet Taluk, Chengalpet District.
2. All India Council for Technical Education
Rep. by its Director (Approval)
Nelson Mandela Mark
Vasanthkunj, New Delhi – 110 070.
3. The Regional Director
All India Council for Technical Education
Sastri Bhavan, No.26, Haddows Road
Chennai – 600 006.
_______
Page 1
http://www.judis.nic.in
[10/20, 17:37] Sekarreporter 1: W.A.Nos.940, 941, 942 and 945 of 2020
2. All India Council for Technical Education
Rep. by its Director (Approval)
Nelson Mandela Mark
Vasanthkunj, New Delhi – 110 070.
3. The Regional Director
All India Council for Technical Education
Sastri Bhavan, No.26, Haddows Road
Chennai – 600 006.
4. The Government of Tamil Nadu
by its Principal Secretary to Government
Department of Higher Education
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
5. The Directorate of Technical Education
Guindy, Chennai – 600 025. .. Respondents
Prayer: Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
order dated 4.9.2020 passed in W.P.Nos.35174 and 35250 of 2019,
and W.P.Nos.9571 and 9601 of 2020.
For Appellant(s)
in all appeals
: Mrs.Narmadha Sampath
Additional Advocate General
for Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram
For 1
st
respondent
in all appeals
: Mr.N.L.Rajah
Senior Counsel
for Mr.K.Balu
For Respondents 2 and
3 in W.A.Nos.940 and
945 of 2020
: Mr.Rabu Manohar
Senior Central Government
Standing Counsel
_______
Page 4
http://www.judis.nic.in
[10/20, 17:38] Sekarreporter 1: W.A.Nos.940, 941, 942 and 945 of 2020
direct, as observed above, that they shall not be given effect to and
shall be subject to any final orders to be passed by the AICTE in the
light of the directions herein above. We uphold the judgment of the
learned Single Judge in quashing the orders passed by the AICTE
dated 30.6.2020.
49. In fine, W.A.Nos.941 aand 942 of 2020 challenging the
judgment of the learned Single Judge arising out of the orders
dated 9.11.2019 passed by the Anna University are, therefore,
partly allowed, and W.A.Nos.940 and 945 of 2020 arising out of the
orders dated 30.6.2020 of the AICTE are disposed of in the light of
the observations made herein above for carrying out the directions
of inspection, hearing and passing of orders in the time period
referred to by us.
In the result, all these appeals stand disposed of accordingly.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are
closed.
_______
Page 53
http://www.judis.nic.in

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com