Follow:
- Next story The single judge bench of Justice G.R.Swaminathan noted that the show cause notice was issued by the Additional Director General of DRI who was not the proper officer to exercise the power under Section 28(4) and the initiation of the recovery proceedings in the present case is without any jurisdiction and liable to be set aside.
- Previous story [3/25, 17:42] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/ZeqPJuhaVkQ [3/25, 17:43] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Lft4woVasUg [3/25, 17:50] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2021/03/25/watch-%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%81%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%81%e0%ae%b5%e0%af%88-%e0%ae%ae%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%81%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%81%e0%ae%b5-%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%82%e0%ae%b0%e0%ae%bf/ [3/25, 17:54] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/j1AQ_fJD2-w
Recent Posts
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Writ Petition No.1835 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.1920 of 2026 S.Uzma Farheen .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary Education Department
- Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to submit a detailed application seeking compensation, along with all relevant particulars and documents, to the competent authority. Upon receipt of such application, the respondents are directed to consider the same for payment of compensation and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. 8. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12.11.2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No vsi2 M. DHANDAPANI, J.
- அனைத்துப் பள்ளி மாணவிகளுக்கும் இலவச நாப்கின்கள் வழங்க வேண்டும் என நீதிபதிகள் ஜே.பி. பர்திவாலா மற்றும் ஆர். மகாதேவன் ஆகியோர் அடங்கிய உச்ச நீதிமன்ற அமர்வு தீர்ப்பு.
- #JanaNayagan CBFC moves to Supreme Court 😮 – The Censor Board has filed a caveat in the Supreme Court, asking the court not to pass any order without hearing their side first. – This is to make sure the Board is heard if anyone challenges the Chennai High Court’s order, which said the censor issue should be handled by a single judge.
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY WP No. 1903 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.2005 of 2026 Elumalai.D (a) Settu ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner, HR and CE Department, Nungambakkam,
More
Recent Posts
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Writ Petition No.1835 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.1920 of 2026 S.Uzma Farheen .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary Education Department
- Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to submit a detailed application seeking compensation, along with all relevant particulars and documents, to the competent authority. Upon receipt of such application, the respondents are directed to consider the same for payment of compensation and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. 8. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12.11.2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No vsi2 M. DHANDAPANI, J.
- அனைத்துப் பள்ளி மாணவிகளுக்கும் இலவச நாப்கின்கள் வழங்க வேண்டும் என நீதிபதிகள் ஜே.பி. பர்திவாலா மற்றும் ஆர். மகாதேவன் ஆகியோர் அடங்கிய உச்ச நீதிமன்ற அமர்வு தீர்ப்பு.
- #JanaNayagan CBFC moves to Supreme Court 😮 – The Censor Board has filed a caveat in the Supreme Court, asking the court not to pass any order without hearing their side first. – This is to make sure the Board is heard if anyone challenges the Chennai High Court’s order, which said the censor issue should be handled by a single judge.
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY WP No. 1903 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.2005 of 2026 Elumalai.D (a) Settu ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner, HR and CE Department, Nungambakkam,