You may also like...
-
“Conclusion: 31. In the present case, the respondents relied on the bank statement produced by the petitioner. It is the statement issued by the Bank of Baroda, Virugambakkam, Tamil Nadu. The account stands in the name of the petitioner. The statements of accounts from 03.01.2024 till 26.01.2025 have been produced before this Court. Perusal of the statement would show that the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.58,06,479.20/-. That apart, the petitioner himself admitted that he has two properties in his name and he has made no attempt to alienate the said properties.” https://www.sekarreporter.com/mr-justice-s-m-subramaniam-and-the-honourable-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq-cmp-no-19328-of-2025-in-osa-sr-no-17760-of-2025-s-venkatesan/#:~:text=Conclusion%3A%0A31,the%20said%20properties.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 28, 2025
-
Justice G Ilangovan, the petitioner stated that the Sipcot police filed a case citing that 39 metric tonnes of ilmenite were illegally stored in a godown of the company. The petitioner denied any illegal storage of such minerals as the consignment was imported from Norway after clearing all formal procedures.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 24, 2021
-