Follow:
- Next story தாமிரபரனி பெயரை வரைபடத்தில் தான் பார்க்க முடியும். Judge Pn Prakash question news in Sathyam TV video click and see
- Previous story Judge m v Muralidaran ordered Writ of Quo Warranto. In the result, a) The Writ Petition (C) No.1210 of 2018 is allowed. b) This Court issued quo-warranto by declaring the promotion of the 5th respondent to the post of Joint Director SCERT dated 28.3.2014 is unconstitutional. [3/2, 16:44] Sekarreporter 1: P a g e | 28 W.P.(C) No. 1210 of 2018 c) The Respondents No. 1 to 4 are hereby directing to remove the 5th respondent from the post of Joint Director SCERT immediately. d) No cost. JUDGE FR/NFR Sushil
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
More
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
