You may also like...
-
![07:18] Sekarreporter: [7/14, 07:18] Sekarreporter: [7/14, 07:18] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1415125925541253121?s=08 [7/14, 07:18] Sekarreporter: Madras HC holds that RWAs are not liable to pay GST if the monthly contribution is “upto Rs.7,500” and they have to pay only on the amount in excess of Rs.7,500.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
07:18] Sekarreporter: [7/14, 07:18] Sekarreporter: [7/14, 07:18] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1415125925541253121?s=08 [7/14, 07:18] Sekarreporter: Madras HC holds that RWAs are not liable to pay GST if the monthly contribution is “upto Rs.7,500” and they have to pay only on the amount in excess of Rs.7,500.
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 14, 2021
-
Smsj full order THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2020 -++-The only question of law raised in the present second appeal is that whether the complaint/application filed by the respondent before the Regulatory Authority is maintainable or not. In view of the fact that the completion certificate issued by the Executive Officer, Town Panchayat is not in consonance either with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act as well as the building plan approval sanctioned by the Director of Town and Country Planning or in accordance with the provision of the RERA Act, the same cannot be construed as a valid certificate for the purpose of grant of exclusion under Section 3(2)(b) of the RERA Act. The certificate is to be construed as insignificant and irrelevant as far as the RERA Act is concerned and for all purposes, the building is to be treated as on-going project. Therefore, the appellants/builders are bound to comply with the terms and conditions in the project as well as comply with the provisions of various laws governing real estate affairs. Accordingly, this Court has no hesitation in arriving a conclusion that the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association is maintainable under the provisions of the RERA Act, 2016 and accordingly, the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal stands confirmed and consequently, Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. The Regulatory Authority is directed to entertain the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association and adjudicate the issues on merits and in accordance with law by affording opportunity to all the parties concerned and accordingly, pass speaking final orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 25, 2021
-
7/31, 16:41] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/mqHA7i3ITHA [7/31, 16:41] Sekarreporter 1: [7/31, 16:31] Saravanan mhc advt Today A complaint on behalf of Mr Ilayaraja was given at the Commissioner of Police Chennai. Additional commissioner Mr Dhinakaran received the complaint and promised to take action. The allegation is that the Prasad studio where Mr Illayaraja has a separate room for himself which is under lock. The key is with Mr Illayaraja however it has come to his knowledge that expensive audio and music equipments are damaged and sold in the black market. Especially his handwritten original composings are there which are now being taken away surreptitiously and sold. Therefore Mr. Ilayaraja has requested action to be initiated against the culprits
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 31, 2020