Senior advocate jothi argued agaist theeba thoon
Senior advocate jothi argued agaist theeba thoon
Follow:
- Next story Senior advta masila mani and shanmuga sundaram argued against theeba thoon
- Previous story Senior advocate valliappan argued for Theeba thoon
Recent Posts
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxhTt9iFrdiWloeVBaepRRz981NkGL73Lp?si=2QWKNJbUWRcJZZrm [13/06, 21:21] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority (TNSLSA), and as per the directions of the Hon’ble Executive Chairman, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, this Authority had
- mandamus forbearing respondents 1 to 3 from proceeding with the construction of a New Bust Stand adjacent to Shri Ulagalanda Perumal Temple also known as Shiri Thiruvikrasamy Temple, Thirukoilur, Kallakurichi District based on petitioner’s representation dated 11.02.2026, followed by petitioner reminder letter dated 19.05.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr. B.Manimaran For Respondent(s):Mr. Veerabathran Prasanth.M. Standing Counsel for R1, R4 and R5 Mr. Mohammed Fayaz Ali Government Pleader for R2, R3 and R6 ORDER
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA S.A.[MD].No.424 of 2008 and MP.[MD].No.1 of 2008 Sivan Pandi S/o.Esakki Thevar, 23-A, Subash Chandra Bose Street, Karungulam, Melapalayam, Palayamkottai Taluk. … Appellant / Plaintiff Vs 1. P.Murugaiah, S/o.Pandaram 2.Minor Sumathi, D/o.P.Murugaiah, 3.Minor Subha, D/o.P.Murugaiah (R2 and R3 represented by father 1st respondent) (All residing at Thanthai Periyar Street, Karungulam, Melapalayam, Palayamkottai Taluk). … Respondents / Defendants PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 26.10.2007, passed in A.S.No.58 of 2006 on the file of the 1st Additional District Court, Tirunelveli modifying the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2006, passed in O.S.No.28 of 2004, on the file of the 1st Additional Sub Court, Tirunelveli. For Appellant : Mr.S.Meenakshi Sundaram Senior Advocate for Mr.T.Selvan For Respondents : No appearance
- Ptasha j பதிவாளரை தற்காலிக பணியிடை நீக்கம் செய்ததற்கும், அதன் அடிப்படையில் மேற்கொண்டு நடவடிக்கை எடுப்பதற்கும் இடைக்கால தடை
- Ganesan Former Dj Judge: Sir , this is not just a boosting post in the instagram now looming large in the social media . It is the most relevant factor to be applicable to our indian democratic republic . The crown princess of the great nation , of course , a developed nation in this planet
More
Recent Posts
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxhTt9iFrdiWloeVBaepRRz981NkGL73Lp?si=2QWKNJbUWRcJZZrm [13/06, 21:21] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority (TNSLSA), and as per the directions of the Hon’ble Executive Chairman, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, this Authority had
- mandamus forbearing respondents 1 to 3 from proceeding with the construction of a New Bust Stand adjacent to Shri Ulagalanda Perumal Temple also known as Shiri Thiruvikrasamy Temple, Thirukoilur, Kallakurichi District based on petitioner’s representation dated 11.02.2026, followed by petitioner reminder letter dated 19.05.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr. B.Manimaran For Respondent(s):Mr. Veerabathran Prasanth.M. Standing Counsel for R1, R4 and R5 Mr. Mohammed Fayaz Ali Government Pleader for R2, R3 and R6 ORDER
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA S.A.[MD].No.424 of 2008 and MP.[MD].No.1 of 2008 Sivan Pandi S/o.Esakki Thevar, 23-A, Subash Chandra Bose Street, Karungulam, Melapalayam, Palayamkottai Taluk. … Appellant / Plaintiff Vs 1. P.Murugaiah, S/o.Pandaram 2.Minor Sumathi, D/o.P.Murugaiah, 3.Minor Subha, D/o.P.Murugaiah (R2 and R3 represented by father 1st respondent) (All residing at Thanthai Periyar Street, Karungulam, Melapalayam, Palayamkottai Taluk). … Respondents / Defendants PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 26.10.2007, passed in A.S.No.58 of 2006 on the file of the 1st Additional District Court, Tirunelveli modifying the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2006, passed in O.S.No.28 of 2004, on the file of the 1st Additional Sub Court, Tirunelveli. For Appellant : Mr.S.Meenakshi Sundaram Senior Advocate for Mr.T.Selvan For Respondents : No appearance
- Ptasha j பதிவாளரை தற்காலிக பணியிடை நீக்கம் செய்ததற்கும், அதன் அடிப்படையில் மேற்கொண்டு நடவடிக்கை எடுப்பதற்கும் இடைக்கால தடை
- Ganesan Former Dj Judge: Sir , this is not just a boosting post in the instagram now looming large in the social media . It is the most relevant factor to be applicable to our indian democratic republic . The crown princess of the great nation , of course , a developed nation in this planet