sekarreporter1: https://youtube.com/post/UgkxZW0cXrmUGHumLJ8iSGLnksbPpLLodX0J?surface=shorts&data=AUylCEvpdJaPzocNFZA-EiTkRaXIMAfVFYGw7s2Lw2qet8F8yHl35IRraBf9T-HbBQ&si=lwuWR4qjPBVFhVW5 [13/11, 08:29] sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner: Anish GK for T Meganathan Petitioner availed benefits of Amnesty scheme by making payment of 100% of the tax demand on or before 31.03.2035. However, there was a 10 day delay in filing of SPL 02 (Waiver Application). Therefore the waiver application was rejected by the respondent. Subsequently bank account was attached. Thereafter, Petitioner approached this Hon’ble High Court. Matter was listed for hearing before Justice Krishnan Ramasamy.

[13/11, 07:48] sekarreporter1: https://youtube.com/post/UgkxZW0cXrmUGHumLJ8iSGLnksbPpLLodX0J?surface=shorts&data=AUylCEvpdJaPzocNFZA-EiTkRaXIMAfVFYGw7s2Lw2qet8F8yHl35IRraBf9T-HbBQ&si=lwuWR4qjPBVFhVW5
[13/11, 08:29] sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner: Anish GK for T Meganathan

Petitioner availed benefits of Amnesty scheme by making payment of 100% of the tax demand on or before 31.03.2035. However, there was a 10 day delay in filing of SPL 02 (Waiver Application). Therefore the waiver application was rejected by the respondent. Subsequently bank account was attached. Thereafter, Petitioner approached this Hon’ble High Court. Matter was listed for hearing before Justice Krishnan Ramasamy.

Since Bank Account was attached, the Petitioner was unable to carry on operations. Therefore the Hon’ble Court directed De-freezing of the bank account of the petitioner.