Sc live chief justice bench judicial officers case
Follow:
- Next story ஜாய் கிரிசில்டா தனது வழக்கறிஞரான நாடாளுமன்ற உறுப்பினர் சுதா உடனே நேற்று சேப்பாக்கம் பகுதியில் உள்ள மாநில மகளிர் ஆணையத்தில் தலைவர் குமாரியை சந்தித்து, வழக்கறிஞரும் எம்பியுமான சுதா உடன் புகார் ஒன்று அளித்தார்.
- Previous story மனைவியின் விபச்சாரத்தை நிரூபிக்க குழந்தையை அடகு வைக்க முடியாது: டிஎன்ஏ பரிசோதனைக்கான மனுவை சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் நிராகரித்தது.
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ O.S.A.No.311 of 2025 and C.M.P. No.23423 of 2025 Akila Thiruvidancore Siddha Vaidhya Sangam,
- Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice NV Anjaria set aside the Karnataka High Court’s decision, which affirmed the Commercial Court’s decision rejecting the Appellant’s
- Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, Justices MM Sundresh, Aravind Kumar, SC Sharma and K Vinod Chandran considered the matter. The bench answered the questions as follows : (i) Judicial Officers who have already completed seven years in Bar before they were recruited in the subordinate judicial service would be entitled for being appointed as a District Judge/Additional District Judge in the selection process for the post of District Judges in the direct recruitment process
- Padma Vibhushan Awardee Sri K. Parasaran, Former Attorney General for India, Eminent Jurist and Senior Advocate -AMISH TRIPATHI, Bestselling author CASE FOR RAM The Untold Insiders’ Story ANIRUDH SHARMA SRIDHAR POTARAJU
- Judgement: there are two judgements. We find that the earlier two judgements Dayal and Chandramohan have not been properly considered. We have divided the judgement in various chapters. The textual interpretation has to match the contextual interpretation. No word of a statute can be read in isolation. Article 233 has to be read in whole. Combined reading would reveal that though the constitution under clause 2 provides for qualification for in service candidate it does nor have qualification for in service candidates. 233(2) only provides for qualification. 233 will have to read to give meaning to the first part.
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ O.S.A.No.311 of 2025 and C.M.P. No.23423 of 2025 Akila Thiruvidancore Siddha Vaidhya Sangam,
- Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice NV Anjaria set aside the Karnataka High Court’s decision, which affirmed the Commercial Court’s decision rejecting the Appellant’s
- Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, Justices MM Sundresh, Aravind Kumar, SC Sharma and K Vinod Chandran considered the matter. The bench answered the questions as follows : (i) Judicial Officers who have already completed seven years in Bar before they were recruited in the subordinate judicial service would be entitled for being appointed as a District Judge/Additional District Judge in the selection process for the post of District Judges in the direct recruitment process
- Padma Vibhushan Awardee Sri K. Parasaran, Former Attorney General for India, Eminent Jurist and Senior Advocate -AMISH TRIPATHI, Bestselling author CASE FOR RAM The Untold Insiders’ Story ANIRUDH SHARMA SRIDHAR POTARAJU
- Judgement: there are two judgements. We find that the earlier two judgements Dayal and Chandramohan have not been properly considered. We have divided the judgement in various chapters. The textual interpretation has to match the contextual interpretation. No word of a statute can be read in isolation. Article 233 has to be read in whole. Combined reading would reveal that though the constitution under clause 2 provides for qualification for in service candidate it does nor have qualification for in service candidates. 233(2) only provides for qualification. 233 will have to read to give meaning to the first part.