Sc advised parents

[03/02, 10:14] Sekarreporter: ” counter affidavit contended that any release of these appellants would inevitably frustrate the trial itself inasmuch the allegations as against these appellants are not just under Section 201 but also under Sections 467 read with section 34 of the IPC as well as the provisions of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988 and hence, no leniency may be shown by this Court with regard to these appellants.”

Advised parents HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv.                    Mr. Siddharth Dave, Sr. Adv.


[03/02, 10:52] Sekarreporter:

 

 

 

Give them money, ATM card: Supreme Court flags parents’ duties in Pune Porsche case sc order

 

[03/02, 10:53] Sekarreporter:

 

 

 

#shorts#

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version