Rss case COMMON COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY police

BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT

MADRAS

(Special original Jurisdiction)

 

L.P.A.Nos.

6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,3

0,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50 of 2022

Against Contempt Petition Nos.

2115, 2249,2334, 2329, 2111, 2239, 2273, 2275, 2341, 2347, 2363, 2367, 2238, 2345, 2348, 2241, 2368, 2366, 2335, 2326, 2350, 2274, 2115, 2272, 2337, 2331, 2336, 2340, 2330, 2364, 2343, 2325, 2240, 2342, 2243, 2346,2322, 2362, 2324, 2365, 2338, 2327, 2349, 2332,2339 of 2022

In

W.P Nos.

24542, 25270, 25437, 25441, 25213, 25440, 25277,

25260, 25125, 25208, 24549, 24946, 25085, 25227, 24982, 25438, 25234, 25435, 24547, 25574, 24544, 25273, 24542, 25396, 25570, 25445, 24945, 25579, 24943, 24551, 24942, 24543, 25079, 25432, 25393, 25084, 25088, 25033,25089, 25130, 25082, 25081, 25264,

25442, 25086 of 2022

 

 

  1. Subramanian,

S/o.V.Ganapathi,

No.4, 2nd Street, Thangam Colony,

Annanagar,

Chennai-600 040.          …Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 6/2022

 

  1. Nethaji,

S/o.S.Sivagnanam,

204, Subash Mudaliar Street,

Muthumandabam, Vellore-632 004.

 

… Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 7/2022

Page No. 01

No. of Correction:

 

 

  1. Alwar, S/o.Thangapandi,

No.255/33, South Car Street, Sankarankoil,

Tenkasi District.

… Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 8/2022

 

 

  1. Chakkaravarthy,

S/o.Elavarasan,

District Secretary,

Rastreeya Swayam Sevak Sangh,

C/o.Nilgiri Seva Kendra,

Chitrakud, D.No.109, Bakie Road,

Udhagamandalam & Post, The Nilgiris – 643 001.

… Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 9/2022

 

 

  1. Karthikeyan, S/o.S.Rajendran,

No.144, 8th Street, Anuchaneyapuram, Kakkaloor, Thiruvallur – 602 003.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 10/2022

 

 

  1. Somasundram,

S/o.Nadalingam,

No.4, Sangabhavanam, Tiruvallur Street, Kokirakulam, Tirunelveli-627 009.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 11/2022

 

 

  1. Rathinagiri,

S/o.M.Muthuramalingam,

530, B/1, Northu Gandhi Gramam, E.B.Colony, Pasupathipalayam Post, Karur-639 004.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 12/2022

 

 

Page No. 02

No. of Correction:

 

 

 

  1. Krishnamurthi,

S/o.Vellayan,

94, Kattabomman Street, Tiruvannamalai Town – 606 601.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 13/2022

 

  1. ShanmugaBala,

S/o.A.Ganesan,

15/8, Varadharajan Street, Nehru Nagar, Chromepet, Chennai-600 044.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 14/2022

 

 

  1. R.Arunprasath, S/o.A.R.Rajendran,

100, 1st Floor, S.M.Road, Gowri Amman KovilOppoite, Arani-632301.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 15/2022

 

 

  1. Subramanian, S/o.Mannusamy,

3/588, Kosavampatti, Namakkal District.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 16/2022

 

 

  1. Prabhakaran, S/o.V.Kuppamuthu,

No.61, East Street, Surapallam, Pattukottai Taluk-614 601.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 17/2022

 

 

  1. Murali,

S/o.N.Ponnurangam,

No.191, Tulasi Nagar, Poygalpakkam Village, Arakkonam-631 002.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 18/2022

 

Page No. 03

No. of Correction:

 

 

  1. Nandakumar, S/o.Kothandan,

No.5, College Street,

Reddy Thoppu,

Ambur – 635 802.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 19/2022

 

  1. Kumar, S/o.Arumugam,

No.35A/1, Kamarajar Street, K.K.Pudur, Coimbatore – 641 038.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 20/2022

 

 

  1. Saravanan, S/o.P.Ramasy,

No.634/2, Viswanath Theatre Complex, Ranipet, Attur-636 102.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 21/2022

 

  1. Chandrasekaran, S/o.Ramasamy,

2/311-3, P.S.P.Nagar,

Korampallam,

Thoothukudi – 628 101.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 22/2022

 

 

  1. Velu, S/o.P.Mayandi,

No.161, North Car Street,

Alwarthirunagari,

Thoothukudi District – 628 612.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 23/2022

 

 

  1. Tamilselvan, S/o.Velusamy,

No.10, Ruthravathy,

Kundalam (via)

Tiruppur District – 638 702.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 24/2022

 

Page No. 04

No. of Correction:

 

  1. Sukumar,

S/o.Muthuramalingam,

No.1, ThevarIllam, Swamy Iyyappan Layout,

Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Mettupalayam,

Nilgiris District.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 25/2022

 

  1. Nandhagopalan, S/o. Shanmugasundaram,

77, Yahoop Steet,

Gobichettipalayam- 638 452.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 26/2022

 

  1. Palanivel, S/o. P.S. Arumugam,

5/18A, Pottavelikadu, Maruthur South [Post],

Vedaranyam Taluk-614 714

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 27/2022

 

 

  1. Sivalingam, S/o. Manivel Nadar,

No.71, Gandhi Road, Sivakasi-626 123.

Virudhunagar District.

 

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 28/2022

 

  1. Venugopal, S/o. Muniappa,

No.22, Shanthi Nekathan Layout,

Karnur,

Mathirigi- 635 110.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 29/2022

 

 

  1. Sathishkumar, S/o. C.Krishnan,

Joint Secretary,

Rashtreeya Swayam Sevak Sangh,  Baiki Road,

Ooty- 643 001.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 30/2022

Page No. 05

No. of Correction:

 

  1. R.Rajaram,

S/o. Ramalingam,

No.133, K.P.Road, Chettikulam,

Nagarkoil District.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 31/2022

 

 

  1. Prabhu Kumar,

S/o. M.Santhanam,

5-3-52, PuthuMariammanKovil Street,

Yelumalai- 625 535.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 32/2022

 

 

  1. Guhan,

S/o. Dharman,

East Street, singampunari Taluk,  Singampunari-630 502.

Sivagangai District.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 33/2022

 

 

  1. K. Anandhan,

S/o. K.N. Krishnamurthy,

32/137, North Street,  Tirubuvanam,

Thiruvidaimaruthu-612 103.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 34/2022

 

 

  1. V.SivaKaaliDhass,

S/o. S.Vidhyanathan,  No.23, Maravaneri Main Road,

Salem-636 007.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 35/2022

 

  1. Ramkumar, S/o. I.Rajagopal,

98/12B, Old GST Road, Near Umeed Apartment,

Chengalpattu-603 001.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 36/2022

 

Page No. 06

No. of Correction:

  1. Raj Nandakumar,

S/o. N.Govindaraj,

No.27/1927, Ethiraj Nagar Ext.,

Valudareddy,

Villupuram- 605 403

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 37/2022

 

 

  1. Srinivasan,

S/o. Krishnaswamy,

No.62, Sri Associates, Pollachi Main Road,

Kinathukadavu,      Coimbatore – 642 109.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 38/2022

 

 

  1. Vijayaram,

S/o. Andiyappan, Nno.189, North Street,

Mattangal Post,

Gandhavakottai,

Pudukottai District – 613 301.

 

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 39/2022

 

  1. Gopal, S/o. Rangasamy,

Shivaji Mandri 7, Town Extension 1st Street,

Dharapuram Road,

Tiruppur-641 604

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 40/2022

 

 

  1. Rajasekar,

S/o. Pandi,

No.5, SappaniKovilIllam,

Middle Street, Cross Street,

Madhichiyam,

Madurai-625 020.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 41/2022

 

Page No. 07

No. of Correction:

 

 

  1. Sivakumar, S/o. P.Ravichandran,

1/100, VinyagarKovil Street,

Arasappapillai Patti Post, Ottanchadram Taluk, Dindugul-624 619.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 42/2022

 

  1. Ganapathi Raja, S/o. V.Thangaraju,

No.3/54G, MookudiAliyanilai[PO],

Aranthangi Taluk,

Pudukkottai District – 614 616.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 43/2022

 

  1. Baskar, S/o.Muthusamy,

92A, Maniyankuttai Street, Rajaji Nagar Post,

Ariyalur-621 713.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 44/2022

 

  1. Balaji,

S/o. B.Radhakrishnan,

No.27, Bangaru Amman Street,  Chinna Kanchipuram,

Kanchipuram- 631 501.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 45/2022

 

  1. Moorthy, S/o. Ramasamy,

Old Indur, Indur [P.O].,

Dharmapuri District-636 803

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 46/2022

 

 

  1. Balaji, S/o. R.Pandiyar,

Sikkachiamman Nagar, Kombai-625 522.

Theni District.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 47/2022

Page No. 08

No. of Correction:

 

 

  1. Gajendren,

S/o. subbiah,

No.3/3342, East Street, Pattanamkatthan Post, Ramanathapuram-623 503.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 48/2022

 

 

  1. Satheesh Kumar,

S/o. Sekhara Pillai,

“Aishwarya” NalloorKonam, Aranmanai Post, Kanyakumari District.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 49/2022

 

 

  1. Sethuraman, S/o. Chellapandiyan,

No.18, LourduMadhaKovil Street, Sangiliyandapuram, Trichy-620 001.

…Appellant/Petitioner in LPA 50/2022

 

 

-Vs-

 

  1. K.Phanindra Reddy I.A.S

The Secretary,

Home Department,

The Government of Tamilnadu,

Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

 

  1. C.Sylendra Babu I.P.S

The Director General of Police,

Post Box No.601, Dr.RadhakrishnanSalai,     Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

…Common Respondent in LPA 6 to 50/2022

 

  1. Sandeep Rai Rathore I.P.S The Commissioner of Police,     Avadi, Chennai-600 054.

 

Page No. 09

No. of Correction:

 

  1. Krishna Murthy,

The Inspector of Police,

T3, Korattur Police Station,     Korattur,

Chennai-600 076.

…Respondents in LPA 6/2022

 

 

  1. Rajesh Kannan, I.P.S

The Superintendent of Police,

Vellore District,

Vellore-632 009.

 

  1. Ravi,

The Inspector of Police,     Sathuvanchari Police Station,     Vellore-632 009.

 

  1. Muthukumar,

The Inspector of Police,     Vellore North Police Station,     Vellore-632 004.

 

 

  1. RajaniKanth,

The Inspector of Police,

Vellore South Police Station,

Vellore-632 001.

…Respondents in LPA 7/2022

 

 

  1. Krishnaraj I.P.S., The Superintendent of Police,     Tenkasi – 602 001.

 

  1. PavulYeshudhasan I

The Inspector of Police,

Tenkasi Town Police Station,       Sankarankoil,

Tenkasi District.

…Respondents in LPA 8/2022

 

Page No. 10

No. of Correction:

 

 

  1. The Superintendent of Police,

Nilgiris District.

 

  1. The Inspector of Police,

B-1, Town Central Police Station,        Udhagamandalam,

The Nilgiris.

…Respondents in LPA 9/2022

 

  1. Pakerla Cephas Kalyan I.P.S

The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvallur District.

Tiruvallur-602 001.

 

  1. PadmashreeLatha,

The Inspector of Police,

Tiruvallur Town Police Station,

Tiruvallur-602 001.

…Respondents in LPA 10/2022

 

 

  1. P.Saravanan, I.P.S The Superintendent of Police,

Tirunelvelli District,

Tirunelveli-627 007.

 

  1. S.Chandra Mohan, The Inspector of Police, Ambasamudram Police Station, Ambasamudram – 627 401.

…Respondents in LPA 11/2022

 

  1. E.Sundaravadanam, I.P.S The Superintendent of Police,

Karur District, Karur – 639 007.

 

  1. Senthur Pandian, The Inspector of Police,

Karur Town Police Station,

Karur – 639 001.

…Respondents in LPA 12/2022

Page No. 11

No. of Correction:

 

  1. K.Karthikeyan, I.P.S The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai District, Thriuvannamalai-606 604.

 

  1. Subramani, The Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai Police Station, Tiruvannamalai – 606 601.

…Respondents in LPA 13/2022

 

 

  1. Dr.A.Amalraj I.P.S The Commissioner of Police, Tambaram,

Shollinganallur, Chennai-600 119.

 

  1. N.Geetha, The Inspector of Police,

Guduvancherry Police Station,

Guduvanchery – 603 202.

…Respondents in LPA 14/2022

 

 

  1. Karthikeyan,

Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District,

Tiruvannamalai – 606 604.

 

  1. Gokulraj, Inspector of Police,

Arani Town Police Station,

Arani-632 301.

…Respondents in LPA 15/2022

 

 

  1. E.SaicharanDesjasvi IPS, The Superintendent of Police,

742G-249, TiruchengodeNamakkal Trichy Road,

Near Collectorate Office,

Namakkal-637 003, Tamil Nadu.

 

Page No. 12

No. of Correction:

 

  1. Sankarapandian,

The Inspector of Police,

Namakkal Town Police Station,

Trichy Main Road, Namakkal – 637 001.

…Respondents in LPA 16/2022

 

 

  1. Ravali Priya,

The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District,

Thanjavur – 613 001.

 

  1. Ramamoorthy,

The Inspector of Police,

Pattukottai Town Police Station, Pattukottai, Chennai – 614 602.

…Respondents in LPA 17/2022

 

 

  1. DeepaSathyan I.P.S

The Superintendent of Police,

Ranipet District, Ranipet – 632 401.

 

  1. Munisekhar,

The Inspector of Police,

Arakkonam Town Police Station (Law and Order), Arakkonam – 631 001.

…Respondents in LPA 18/2022

 

  1. K.S.Bala Krishnan, Superintendent of Police, Tiruppatur District,

Tiruppatur – 635 601.

 

  1. Suresh Shanmugam,

Inspector of Police,

Ambur Town Police Station,

Ambur – 635 802.

…Respondents in LPA 19/2022

 

Page No. 13

No. of Correction:

 

 

  1. Balakrishnan, I.P.S

The Commissioner of Police,

Coimbatore City, Coimbatore – 641 018.

 

  1. Satheesh,

The Inspector of Police,

Kaniyamuthur Police Station (Law and Order), Coimbatore – 641 008.

 

  1. A.Natesan,

The Inspector of Police,

Podanur Police Station (Law and Order),

Coimbatore – 641 023.

…Respondents in LPA 20/2022

 

  1. Shree Abhinav IPS,

The Superintendent of Police, Salem District Salem – 636 002.

 

  1. Senthilkumar,

The Inspector of Police, Attur Police Station,

Attur – 636 002.

…Respondents in LPA 21/2022

 

 

  1. Balaji Saravanan, Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District,

Thoothukudi – 628 101.

 

  1. Raja Ram,

Inspector of Police,

Thoothukudi South Police Station,

Thoothukudi – 628 101.

…Respondents  in LPA 22/2022

 

  1. Balaji Saravanan,

Superintendent of Police,

Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi – 628 101.

 

Page No. 14

No. of Correction:

 

  1. Annaraj,

Inspector of Police,

Srivaikundam Police Station,

Srivaikundam – 628 101.

…Respondents in LPA 23/2022

 

  1. Shashank Sai I.P.S The Superintendent of Police,

Tiruppur District,

Palladam Road, Tiruppur – 641 604.

 

  1. Sahul Ameer,

The Inspector of Police, Mulanur Police Station,

Mulanur – 638 106.

…Respondents in LPA 24/2022

 

  1. Ashish Rawat, I.P.S. Superintendent of Police,   Nilgiris District.

 

  1. R.Paramasivam, The Inspector of Police,

Mettupalayam Police Station, Mettupalayam,

Nilgiris District.

…Respondents in LPA 25/2022

 

  1. Saimohan I.P.S., The Superintendent of Police, Erode District.

PS Park, Erode, Erode-638001.

 

  1. Deivaani,

The Inspector of Police,

Gobichettipalayam Town Police Station, Gobichettipalayam-638 452.

…Respondents in LPA 26/2022

 

 

  1. G. Jawahar, I.P.S.,

The Superintendent of Police, Nagapattinam District.

Nagapattinam – 611 001.

 

  1. Supriya,

The Inspector of Police,

Vedaranyam Police Station,

Vedaranyam-614 810.

…Respondents in LPA 27/2022

 

  1. M.Manohar,

The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District.

Virudhunagar- 626 002.

 

  1. Geetha,

The Inspector of police,

Town Police Station,

Srivilliputtur-626 125.

….Respondents in LPA 28/2022

 

 

  1. Saroj Kumar Thakur, I.P.S., The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District.

Krishnagiri – 635 115.

 

  1. Sivakumar,

The Inspector of police,

Hosur Police Station, Hosur- 635 109.

 

  1. Shanmuga Sundaram,

The Inspector of Police,

Hosur Hudco Police Station,

Hosur- 635 109.

….Respondents in LPA 29/2022

 

Page No. 16

No. of Correction:

 

  1. Ashish Rawat, IPS The Superintendent of Police,

Nilgiris District,

Nilgiris-643 001.

 

  1. Venkatachalam, The Inspector of Police, Gudalur Police Station,

Nilgiris District.

….Respondents in LPA 30/2022

 

  1. N. Hari Kiran Prasad, I.P.S., The Superintendent of Police, Nagarkoil District.

 

  1. Sundara Manickam, The Inspector of Police, Kotar Police Station, Nagarkoil District.

 

  1. J.Naveen,

The Inspector of  Police, Vadaseri Police Station,

Nagarkoil District.

….Respondents in LPA 31/2022

 

 

  1. Sujit Kumar,

The Superintendent of Police,

Madurai District, Madurai- 625 007.

 

  1. Lakshmi Latha, The Inspector of Police,

Thirumangalam Town Police Station,

Thirumangalam- 625 706.

….Respondents in LPA 32/2022

 

  1. M.Rajarajan,

The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

 

  1. Maheshwari,

The Inspector of Police,

Sivagampunari- 630 502.

Sivagangai District.

…Respondents in LPA 33/2022

 

  1. Ravali Priya Gandhapuneni, The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District.

Thanjavur-613 001.

 

  1. Baby,

The Inspector of Police,

Pottramarai Kolam Police Station,

Kumbakonam-612 001.

…Respondents in LPA 34/2022

 

 

  1. Ravali Priya Gandhapuneni, The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District.

Thanjavur-613 001.

 

  1. Baby,

The Inspector of Police,

Pottramarai Kolam Police Station,

Kumbakonam-612 001.

….Respondents in LPA 35/2022

 

  1. Suguna Singh,

The Superintendent of Police, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

 

  1. VadivelMurugan, The Inspector of Police,

Chengalpattu Town Police Station,

Chengalpattu

….Respondents in LPA 36/2022

 

Page No. 18

No. of Correction:

 

  1. Dr.N.Shreenatha, IPS.,

The Superintendent of Police,

Villupuram, Villupuram  District.

 

  1. Kamaraj,

The Inspector  of Police, Villupuram Town Police Station, Villupuram- 605 602.

 

  1. Selvaraj,

Villupuram West Police Station, PJN Road, Villupuram District, Villupuram-605 602.

 

  1. Anandan,

Villupuram Taluk Police Station,

East PondyRaod,

Villupuram District.

Villupuram – 605 602.                               …Respondents in LPA 37/2022

 

 

  1. Badrinarayanan, I.A.S.,

Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore District,

Coimbatore – 641 001.

 

  1. Shanmugasundran,

Inspector of Police,

Mahalingapuram Police Station, Pollachi – 642 002.

 

  1. Anandhanayagi,

Inspector of Police,

Town East Police Station,

Pollachi – 642 001.

… Respondents in LPA 38/2022

 

  1. Vandita Pandey,

The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District.

  1. D.Vasuki,

The Inspector of Police,

Gandharvakottai Police Station,

Pudukottai District.

….Respondents in LPA 39/2022

 

  1. Shashank Sai I.P.S., The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District.

 

  1. Manikandan, The Inspector of Police,

Palladam Police Station,

Palladam- 641 664.

….Respondents in LPA 40/2022

 

 

  1. T.Senthilkumar,I.P.S.,

The Commissioner of Police, Madurai, K.Pudur, Madurai- 625 002.

 

  1. Sathu Ramesh,

E-3, Anna Nagar Police Station, Dharmapuri B-1 Police Station,

Madurai- 625 020.

….Respondents in LPA 40/2022

 

  1. T.Senthilkumar,I.P.S.,

The Commissioner of Police, Madurai, K.Pudur, Madurai- 625 002.

 

  1. Sathu Ramesh,

E-3, Anna Nagar Police Station,   Dharmapuri B-1 Police Station,

Madurai- 625 020.

….Respondents in LPA 41/2022

 

 

  1. V.R.Seenivasan, The Superintendent of Police, Dindugal District.

Dindugal- 624 603.

 

Page No. 20

No. of Correction:

 

 

  1. C.Uthayakumar, The Inspector of Police,

Palani Town Police Station,

Palani – 624 601.

….Respondents in LPA 42/2022

 

 

  1. Sandeep Rai Rathore I.P.S., The Commissioner of Police, Avadi, Chennai- 600 054.

 

  1. Krishna Murthy, The Inspector of Police,

T3 Korattur Police Station, Korattur, Chennai- 600 076.

….Respondents in LPA 43/2022

 

 

  1. K.Feroze Khan Abdullah, The Superintendent of Police,

Ariyalur District,

Ariyalur-621 704.

 

  1. Gopinath,

The Inspector of police,  Ariyalur Police Station,

Ariyalur -621 704.

….Respondents in LPA 44/2022

 

  1. MN Sudhakar I.P.S., The Superintendent of Police,

RMFW -4RP,

ThaiyarKullam,

Kanchipuram- 631 501.

 

  1. Sundarrajan, The Inspector of police,

Vishnu Kanchi Town Police Station,

Kanchipuram -621 704.

….Respondents in LPA 45/2022

 

Page No. 21

No. of Correction:

 

  1. Kalaiselvan, I.P.S., The Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District.

Dharmapuri – 636 705.

 

  1. Nawas,

The Inspector of police,    Dharmapuri B-1 Police Station,   Dharmapuri- 636 701.

….Respondents in LPA 46/2022

 

 

  1. Dongare Pravin Umesh, I.P.S., The Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

heni – 625 531.

 

  1. Ramalakshmi, The Inspector of police,

Chinnamanur Police Station,

Chinnamanur- 636 515.

….Respondents in LPA 47/2022

 

 

  1. Thangadurai,

The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

Ramathapuram- 623 503.

 

  1. Maruthupandian, The Inspector of police,

B-2 Police Station,

Ramanathapuram – 623 501.

….Respondents in LPA 48/2022

 

 

  1. D.N. Hari Kiran Prasad I.P.S., The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District.

Nagercoil-629 001.

 

Page No. 22

No. of Correction:

 

  1. Murugan,

The Inspector of police,

Arumanai Town Police Station,

Arumanai- 629 151.

….Respondents in LPA 49/2022

  1. Karthikeyan I.P.S., The Commissioner of Police,

Tiruchirapalli City,

Tiruchirapalli -620 002.

 

  1. Dhayalan,

The Inspector of police,  Fort Police Station, Tiruchirapalli.

 

  1. Sugumaran, The Inspector of Police,

Gandhi Market Police Station,

Tiruchirapalli- 620 001.  ….Respondents in LPA 50/2022

 

 

COMMON COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY

 

I, D. Magesh Kumar, S/o S. Dhanuskodi, aged 51 years, presently working as Assistant Inspector General of Police, High Court cases Monitoring Cell at the Office of the Director General of Police/Head of Police Force, Chennai – 600 004, do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows:-

  1. I respectfully submit that I am presently working as Assistant Inspector General of Police, High Court cases Monitoring Cell, and as such I am well acquainted with the facts and circumstances of this case, and thus I am filing this Common Counter Affidavit before this Honourable Court.

Page No. 23

No. of Correction:

 

I submit that the petitioners who are members of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh [RSS] had announced to conduct a route march followed by Public meeting in 50 districts for State of Tamil Nadu on 02.10.2022. I further submit that the route march was allegedly to celebrate the 75th year of Independence and birth centenary of Dr.B.R.

Ambedkar.

  1. I submit that the petitioners had given representations to all the Station House Officers of various Police Stations. I further submit that when the representations were under considerations the above petitioners filed a Writ Petitions before this Hon’ble High Court, all the Writ Petitions were clubbed together and was heard on 22.09.2022. The

Hon’ble High Court was pleased to pass an order to direct the Police Department to grant permission to conduct the procession followed by Public Meeting on 02.10.2022 throughout the State of Tamil Nadu on or before 28.09.2022.

3.I submit that during this interregnum the Union Government through its agency National Investigation Agency (NIA) conducted several raids throughout India against the ‘Popular Front of India’ and other allied organizations followed by that ‘Popular Front of India’ [PFI] and other similar organizations were banned for a period of 5 years on 28.09.2022. I further submit that PFI and various other allied organizations had protested this ban and also there were attacks owning to this ban across

India especially on functionaries of petitioner’s organizations and other allied organizations and political parties.

Page No. 24

No. of Correction:

 

  1. I submit that due to the ban of Popular Front of India [PFI], there is threat from various sources to the Leaders of the Petitioners Organization till date. Under those, circumstances, it was assessed that the prevailing conditions it is not safe to conduct procession by the Petitioners Organization. In such a circumstance it was decided that due to prevailing Law and Order situations and ban of Popular Front of India [PFI] the permission seeking Procession followed by the Public Meeting was rejected.
  2. I submit that the petitioners who very well knew about the ban of Popular Front of India [PFI] went ahead and filed a Contempt Petitions to grant permission for the procession followed by Public Meeting, as per the orders in W.P.No.25213 of 2022.
  3. I submit that when the Contempt Petitions were taken up for hearing on 30.09.2022 the counsel for the petitioners and the State was heard and the prevailing situations about the ban of Popular Front of India [PFI] and other similar various organizations for the period of 5 years by the Union Government was pointed out and the threats faced by the leaders of Petitioners organization was also informed to the Court.
  4. I submit that it was also pointed out to the court that due to the ban of the above mentioned organizations, there were 59144 Police Personnel were posted under the supervision of Deputy Superintendents of Police to various Political Leaders of Petitioner’s organization and it is allied Political Parties. I further submit that it was pointed out to this

Hon’ble High Court that if the procession is conducted on 02.10.2022 it will be a risk to their life and limb as well as disrupt the law and order in the state.

Page No. 25

No. of Correction:

 

  1. I submit that during the course of arguments in Contempt Petitions the counsel on behalf of the petitioners accepting the arguments of the State had suggested four dates for conducting procession followed by Public Meeting. I further submit that on the submission made by the both sides, the Court fixed the date to conduct Public Meeting on 06.11.2022 and further directed the petitioners not to precipitate the issue further.
  2. I submit that when the matter was listed on 31.10.2022 the Director General of Police had produced the order dated 29.10.2022 which authorized respective Commissioner of Police / Superintendent of Police to consider the representations of the Petitioners to conduct procession followed by Public meeting by assessing the Law and Order situations prevailing in their jurisdiction.
  3. I submit that as per the orders of the Director General of Police dated 29.10.2022 the respective Commissioner of Police / Superintendent of Police out of 50 places, 23 places/districts the petitioners were permitted to conduct the procession followed by Public Meeting in an indoor place specifically mentioning the security reasons. I further submitted that so far as 24 places are concerned authorities found that there will be a Law and Order problem and rejected it again in view of the intelligence report from both the State agency and the Union Government.

Page No. 26

No. of Correction:

 

  1. I submit that after going through the Intelligence report the Court had observed that ongoing Law and Order situation and the recent incidents relating to Car Blast on 23.10.2022 in Coimbatore which is being investigated by the NIA it had upheld the rejection of procession followed by Public Meeting on 06.11.2022 in the following Districts alone.
  2. Coimbatore
  3. Pollachi
  4. Nagercoil
  5. Palladam
  6. Mettupalayam and
  7. Arumani

 

  1. I submit that after considering the Intelligence report, prevailing the Law and Order situations and the submission of counsel on either side the court was pleased to grant permission to conduct procession in all locations except for the above mentioned 6 places, with certain reasonable restriction which are in no way violative of the rights of the petitioner.
  2. I submit that the petitioner’s organizations after the order in its officials press release had declared that the procession will not be conducted on 06.11.2022 for the reasons best known.
  3. I submit that now, the petitioners have come forward with the Letters Patent Appeal to set aside the Order and consequently punish the respondents which is prima facie not maintainable.

Page No. 27

No. of Correction:

 

  1. I submit that this Hon’ble Court in the Contempt Petitions had concluded that there is no willful disobedience on the part of the respondents and dismissed the contempt petitions. I further submit that once the contempt Petitions is filed the matter is between the court and the contemnor and the petitioners have no say whether the court has to decide whether its order was willfully disobeyed and whether punishment is necessary.
  2. I submit that permission was granted for 23 places to conduct procession followed by the Public Meeting in an indoor place, and orders were passed stating sufficient reasons that prevailing situations is not conducive for the petitioner’s organizations. I am advised to submit that while deciding the question of Law and Order the Supreme Court in this judgment reported in Karnataka Live Band Restaurants Association Vs. State of Karnataka and Others reported in (2018) 4 SCC 372

Salus PopuliSupermo Lex” which means the safety of the people is the Supreme Law and the other is “Salus Republicae Supreme

Lex” which means safety of the State is the supreme law.

In our considered view, it is the prime duty, rather statutory duty, of the Police personal/administration of every State to maintain and give precedence to the safety and the morality of the people and the State….”.

I further submit that various decisions of the Supreme Court starting from Hitmat Lal K.Shah Vs Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad and another reported in 1973 (1) SCC 227 to Ramilah Maithan incident  reported    in   2012   (5)   SCC  1  has  held that  a  regularity

Page No. 28

No. of Correction:

 

mechanism of reasonable restrictions contemplated under Articles 19(2) & 19(3) of Constitution of India can be imposed by the authorities which will help in insuring due Social order and also would not impinge upon rights of the others contemplated under Article 21 that Constitution of India.I further submit that the Police Authorities who are required to maintain   the Social orders and Public tranquility have a say in the organizational matters relating to holding of dharnas, procession, agitation and rally’ s of the present kind.

 

  1. I submit that the LPA’s filed challenging order for the contempt is not maintainable on 2 grounds
  • When the contempt is dismissed and the court had found that there is no willful disobedience against the dismissal of the contempt petition, the contempt appeal by the petitioners will not lie. The petitioners by filing a Letters patent appeal is trying to achieve indirectly what cannot be done directly.
  • Although the order passed by the Single Judge of the Hon’ble High Court dismissing the contempt petition is a final order, a part of the order which issues directions and reasonable restrictions in conducting the procession followed by a public meeting is interlocutory in nature and it does not affect the right of the petitioners forever.

 

  1. I am advised to submit that in the decision by the Supreme Court reported in Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra, (1977) 4 SCC 551 : 1978 SCC (Cri) 10 at page 557 it was held that

Page No. 29

No. of Correction:

 

“12. Ordinarily and generally the expression “interlocutory order” has been understood and taken to mean as a converse of the term “final order”. In volume 22 of the third edition of Halsbury’s Laws of England at p. 742, however, it has been stated in para 1606:

“… a judgment or order may be final for one purpose and interlocutory for another, or final as to part and interlocutory as to part. The meaning of the two words must therefore be considered separately in relation to the particular purpose for which it is required.”

In para 1607 it is said:

“In general a judgment or order which determines the principal matter in question is termed ‘final’.”

In para 1608 at pp. 744 and 745 we find the words:

“An order which does not deal with the final rights of the parties, but either (1) is made before judgment, and gives no final decision on the matters in dispute, but is merely on a matter of procedure, or (2) is made after judgment, and merely directs how the declaration of right already given in the final judgment, are to be worked out, is termed ‘interlocutory’. An interlocutory order, though not conclusive of the main dispute, may be conclusive as to the subordinate matter with which it deals.”

This judgment makes it clear that a judgment or an order may be final for one purpose and interlocutory for another or final as to part and interlocutory as to particle. It is further submitted that in the case in hand the direction issued in the contempt petition regarding the conduct of procession followed by public meeting is in the nature of an interlocutory order and does not violate the rights of the petitioners forever.

Page No. 30

No. of Correction:

 

  1. I am advised to submit that in such a scenario as per the Judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Midnapore People Co-Operative Bank Limited and others VS Chunilal Nanda and others  2006 (5) SCC 399 it was held that

“15. Interim orders/interlocutory orders passed during the pendency of a case, fall under one or the other of the following categories:

  • Orders which finally decide a question or issue in controversy in the main case.
  • Orders which finally decide an issue which materially and directly affects the final decision in the main case.
  • Orders which finally decide a collateral issue or question which is not the subject-matter of the main case.
  • Routine orders which are passed to facilitate the progress of the case till its culmination in the final judgment.
  • Orders which may cause some inconvenience or some prejudice to a party, but which do not finally determine the rights and obligations of the parties.
  1. The term “judgment” occurring in clause 15 of the Letters Patent will take into its fold not only the judgments as defined in Section 2(9) CPC and orders enumerated in Order 43 Rule 1 CPC, but also other orders which, though may not finally and conclusively determine the rights of parties with regard to all or any matters in controversy, may have finality in regard to some collateral matter, which will affect the vital and valuable rights and obligations of the parties. Interlocutory orders which fall under categories (i) to   (iii)  above, are, therefore, “judgments” for the

Page No. 31

No. of Correction:

 

 purpose of filing appeals under the Letters Patent. On the other hand, orders falling under categories (iv) and (v) are not

“judgments” for the purpose of filing appeals provided under the Letters Patent”.

  1. I further submit that the case in hand the petitioners had themselves come forward with the representation dated 23.12.2022 to conduct procession followed by public meeting on 29.01.2023 and this LPA has been filed only to pressurize authorities concerned to grant permission as per their whims and fancies.
  2. I submit that the above contention that LPA have been filed only for the purpose of mounting pressure on the authorities to grant permission as per their wish is made clear from the representations dated

23.12.2022 which reads as follows: –

“The  subject mentioned L.P.A. came up for admission before the

Hon’ble Division Bench of His Lordships Justice R.Mahadevan and & Justice Sathya Narayana Prasad on 22.12.2022.  Arguments were advanced by the Appellants and the Division Bench issued Notice to the State Police/ Respondents returnable by 05.01.2023.

Page No. 32

No. of Correction:

 It was also suggested by the Division Bench to the Appellants to make a request to the concerned Police officials/Respondents for granting permission to conduct the Route March followed by a Public meeting indicating a specific date.

 I hereby request you to grant us permission to conduct the Route March followed by a Public meeting on 29.01.2023 as per the terms requested in our earlier application dated 30.08.2022 addressed to your good-self.

 I am herewith enclosing the copy of the earlier application dated 30.08.2022  for your kind perusal and consideration. I hereby request your good-self to grant permission to conduct Route March followed by a Public meeting on the date and time specified above i.e. on 29.01.2023”.

  1. The above representations clearly establishes the intention of the petitioners is not to excise their rights provided under the constitution rather to mount pressure on the authorities to conduct the procession and thus create law and order situation in the state. I further submit that the representations date 23.12.2022 which solely given stating that LPA is pending before this Hon’ble High Court the case stands posted on 05.01.2023 only makes it clear the petitioners have approached this Hon’ble Court with unclean hands.

Page No. 33

No. of Correction:

  1. I submit that the earlier representations were made to conduct procession followed by the Public meeting on 02.10.2022 for the alleged purpose of 75th year of Independence, Gandhi Jayanthi, Dr.Ambedkar Jayanthi and Vijayadhasami. I humbly submit that now the procession for the above purpose is not relevant anymore and now the petitioners are asking this only to create a Law and Order situations and thereby affect the social harmony of the State. I further submit that when the petitioner’s organizations approach the concerned authorities for procession followed by the public meeting in appropriate time with proper details the same will be considered.
  2. I submit that the contention by the petitioners is that there is no Law and Order Issue after their organization procession in any State is not correct, to sight an example on 12.10.2022 Haveri Districts, Karnataka 20 people were arrested following the assault of petitioners organizations workers. There are various other incidents reported in neighbouring states were Petrol Bomb was hurdled against functionaries of petitioner’s organizations and allied political parties.
  3. I submit that the following cases have been registered owning to raids conducted by the NIA followed by banning Popular Front of India [PFI] by the Union Government and the cases cited clearly establishes the threat against the functionaries of the petitioner’s organization and the allied parties.

Page No. 34

No. of Correction:

Details of cases on arson attacks, throwing petrol bombs and stone pelting on properties of petitioners organisation and allied parties

after NIA raids on 14.10.2022

Sl.

No.

City/District /  Cr.No.

date of Incident

Gist of the incident Accused details
1. Coimbatore District Pollachi West PS Cr.No.256/22 U/s.427

IPC & 3 (1) of TNPPDL

Act.

22.09.22 – 2200-

Stone Pelting

The accused damaged the car parked in front of residence of Ponraj

(BJP CBE South District Non-

organisational LabourersWing 

Secretary) , Kumaran Nagar Palaniappa

Layout,

Pollachi West PS

1.Mohamed Rafiq (26), S/o Jamal Moideen, No.32, Oothukkadu Road, Pollachi, Coimbatore

Pollachi South Area Secretary,

PFI

 

2.Ramesh Raja(36), S/o Akbar,

D.No.10/4, KarikalaCholan Street, Vivekanandar Nagar, Suleswaranpatti, Pollachi,

Coimbatore

PFI Member

 

3.Sadiq Basha (35), S/o Isac, D.No.42/21, Sherif Colony,

Pollachi, Combatore

PFI Member

 

4.Abdul Jaleel-32 s/o muthaleef,

D.no.7/137, Pollachi main road, Meenatchipuram. Coimbatore

District.

SDPI Valparai Area Secretary.

Detained under NSA 270/2022

 

5.mohamed rafiq 31 s/o Mohamed hanifa,kumarannagar

2nd layout, pollachi.

PFI Member

2. Coimbatore District Pollachi West PS

Cr.No.257/22 U/s.427, 435 r/w 511 IPC and 3(1) of TNPPDL Act.  D/O: 22.09.22 – 2000

 

Arson attack

 

The accused burnt the car by pouring diesel  parked at the residence of Sivakumar (BJP

Member & CBE South District Ex Secretary,

BJP     Trade       Union),

No.8/B, Kumaran Nagar,

2nd layout, Pollachi

Pollachi West PS

 

Page No. 35

No. of Correction:

3. Coimbatore District Pollachi West PS Cr.No.258/22 U/s.427

IPC & 3 (1) of TNPPDL

Act.

D/O: 22.09.22 – 2200

Petrol Bomb (Diesel filled cover):

The accused thrown a diesel filled plastic cover containing stones  on the vehicle owned by

Saravanakumar

(Member,               Hindu

Munnani) parked  on Kumaran Nagar road

side, Pollachi

 

 
4. Coimbatore District Pollachi West PS Cr.No.259/22 U/s.427

IPC & 3 (1) of TNPPDL

Act.

D/O: 22.09.22 – 2200

Damage by Axe and deadly weapons

 

The accused damage abey auto parked in front of the residence of Venugopal  No.157, Kumaran Nagar, 2nd layout, Pollachi West PS with axe and deadly weapons.

5. Coimbatore District

Pollachi West PS Cr.No. 260/22 U/s. 435 r/w 511 IPC.

D/O: 22.09.22 – 1900

Petrol Bomb

The accused  thrown a diesel filled pocket on TATA Ace parked at the residence of Vellingiri (RSS CBE South Dist. Incharge), 11/2, MGM

Nagar, Palakkad Road,

Pollachi

Pollachi West PS

6. Rahman Ali @ Abdul Rahman (24) S/o.Akbar Ali, 9/1, RamakrishnasamyLay  out,

Pollachi  (PFI member)

 

 

All the accused arrested and sent them  for remand at  Central

Prison,          Coimbatore           on

25.09.2022  and 28.09.2022

 

 

 

Page No. 36

No. of Correction:

 

6.

 

Coimbatore District

Mettupalayam PS Cr.No.761/22 U/s 436 IPC r/w 3(a) of ES Act. D/O: 22.09.22 21.00 to

23.09.22 – 0930 hrs.

D/R:23.09.22-13.00 Hrs

Petrol Bomb

The accused  thrown

Petrol bomb in front of

Naveen           Hardwares

(owns                           by

SachinPaanthiya, RSS supporter), No.147, New Extension Street,

Mettupalayam

 

1.              Nazeer Ahamed (29) S/o.Abbas Ali, SirajNagar,

Sirumugai Road, Mettupalayam

(PFI member)

 

2.              Sheik Faridh (29) S/o.AbdulSamad, No.157,

AnnajiRao Road, Mettupalayam

(PFI member) RP No.5679

DOA: 29.09.2022

 

 

3.Mohamed Thoufiq (25),

S/o     Mohamed     Rafiq,      Near

SaibabaKovil,

MajithChettiveethi, Annaji Rao Road, Mettupalayam

SDPI PeriyaPallivasal Branch

President

 

4.Wahithur Rahman- 25 s/o Jeinulabutheen, 69, AB,2nd Extension Street, Annajirao Road, Mettupalayam.

PFI      Member      (NSA        ON

15.10.2022)

(NSA No.267 dt 15.10.2022) All the accused were arrested.

 

7. Coimbatore District Mettupalayam PS Cr.No.762/22 U/s 436 r/w 3(a) of ES Act. D/O:22.09.22 2100 Petrol Bomb

The accused   thrown petrol filled bottle into

The Ply Home shop

(owns                           by

Mathankumar,         RSS

Supporter)

8. Coimbatore city –

Kattur PS Cr.No.478/22 U/s.153A, 285 IPC. @ 153A,436, 511 IPC &

Sec.3      of      ES        Act

D/o: 22.09.22 -2035 Hrs.

D/R: 22.09.22 – 2130 Hrs

Petrol Bomb

 

The accused thrown petrol bomb  on  BJP Head office, Coimbatore city

 

All the accused were arrested

 

A-1Sadham Hussain (31), S/o SulaimanD.No.215, Cheran Colony, Thudiyalur,

CoimbatorePFIThudiyalur

Branch President

Detained under NSA No.261/22 A2Sihabudeen-24

s/o Sikkandar, D.No:95, E.R.S

Thottam, Thudiyalur,

Coimbatore.SDPIGoundampala yam Constituency Secretary Detained under NSA No.260/22

 

Page No. 37

No. of Correction:

9. Coimbatore city

Varity Hall Road PS Cr.No.182/22

U/s.153,285, 435 IPC.@

307,436

Explosives

Act

 

22.09.22

 

 

IPC r/w 3 of substances

Petrol Bomb

 

The      accused

petrol filled bottle on the residence

DineshkumarOppanakar aVeethi,       Variety

Road PS limit

 

 

thrown

of

Hall

A1 Abdul Rahman @ Naveen @ Nabeen-30 s/o Anwar Basha,

D.no:15, Kulathuvaikkal Road,

Sungam,

Sinthamani Backside,

Ramanathapuram,

Coimbatore City.(PFI member)

 

A2- S.Basha (36),s/o Chottu, D.no:72,City Park,2nd Street, Ukkadam,Coimbatore City (PFI member)

(HeSurrendered before JM VII, CBE on 29.09.2022 in D4 Kuniyamuthur PS Cr.no:439/ 2022 u/s 147, 341,353, 332, 506(1) IPC r/w 3(1) of TNPPDL

Act)

TPDA 287/22

 

10. Coimbatore City Rathinapuri PS

Cr.No.489/22         U/s.435

IPC @ 153 A, 435 IPC &

3          of        ES          Act.

D/O: 23.09.22 – 0920 Hrs

 

Petrol Bomb

The accused thrown a  petrol mixed bottle with wick on Veni Traders (belonging to one Mohan, Rathinapuri Zonal President, BJP) at Prasath Road

A1- Muhamed Rafiq (30) s/o Babu, Railway Station Road, Gaandhi Street, Thudiyalur.

Coimbatore        District.        SDPI

Member

 

2.Sheik Mujibur Rahman,

S/o Junaideen, C-4 Rathinapuri PS limit

SDPI member of Thudiyalur,

Coimbatore District

RP7242 – DOA: 30.09.2022

All the accused were arrested

 

 

Page No. 38

No. of Correction

11. Coimbatore City Kuniamuthur PS

Cr.No.445/22 U/s.435 IPC @ 120(B), 153A, 435 IPC & 3 of ES Act.

D/O: 23.09.22-1345 Hrs

Arson attack

 

The accused attempted to set fire   by pouring petrol  on the car, parked at  the residence of Thiyagu Kandasamy (member Hindu

Munnani) ServaiVeethi,

Opposite       to         Aram

ValarthaMariammanKovi l,

Kuniyamuthur PS

A1 Jesuraj (34)

S/o. Suganraj, Block 15/451, Scheme area, Arivoli Nagar,

Kovaipudur, Coimbatore

87th Ward President, SDPI

 

A2 Iliyas (36), S/o Abdul Rahman, 44E, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Kuniyamuthur,

CoimbtaoreSDTU Member

 

A3       Abdul       Sugarna         @

Amrishkhan (29),

S/o Bulkhan, D.No.36/50, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Kuniyamuthur, Coimbatore

SDPI

A4

Asraf     Ali-32     s/o      Mohamad

Saliya,

D.no:19, Krishna Nagar, Mailkal, Sugunapuram East, Coimbatore

City

All the accused were arrested

12. Coimbatore                 City

Kuniamuthur               PS

Cr.No.447/22       U/s.435

IPC. @ 120(B), 153A, 435 IPC & 3 of ES Act.

D/O: 23.09.22-2310 Hrs

Petrol Bomb

The accused thrown petrol filled quarter bottle with fire on the car parked at the residence of Kamalakannan (BJP member) at

Ganesapuram Road

13. Coimbatore City Kuniamuthur PS Cr.No.446/22 U/s 435

IPC.

D/O: 23.09.22-2058 Hrs

 

Petrol Bomb:

Unknown             persons

Thrown kerosene bottle in front of the gate of

AnanthaKalyana

(Samaskirutha

Bharathi Dakshana State Presdient and Tamil Nadu Kerala Coordinator) , No.13, VinayagarKoil Street, Kovaipudur, Near Day to day shopping mall

 

 

A1

Asraf     Ali-32     s/o      Mohamad

Saliya,

D.no:19, Krishna Nagar, Mailkal, Sugunapuram East, Coimbatore

City

RP 5881 – DOA: 09.10.22

 

 

 

 

Page No. 39

No. of Correction

14. Erode        Taluk          PS

Cr.No.339/2022 u/s.435

IPC r/w.4 of Explosive

Substances Act 1908 D.O:

22.09.2022 1930  to 23.09.2022 @ 1000 Hrs

D.R:

23.09.2022 @ 1600 Hrs

 

Transferred to CBCID Cr.No.03/22 U/s.435 IPC r/w 4(a)(1) of ES Act

Petrol Bomb

The accused thrown two polythene cover filled with Diesel inside the Gayathiri Furniture shop, Near Telephone Nagar

Bus Stop Moolapalayam

(owns                           by

Dhachanamoorthy,

BJP Ex. Erode South District, Youth Wing Secretary)  through window grill gap.

1.Kaleel Rahman (27)

S/o Mohamed Iliyas,

D.No.25, KaikkolarVeethi,

BP Agraharam, Erode SDPI Member

RP 7067 – DOA: 26.09.22

 

 

2.Sadham Hussain (25), S/o

Mohamed Rafiq,

D.No.190 A/48, SeganVeethi,

Karungalpalayam, Erode

SDPI Member

 

RP 7064 – DOA: 26.09.22

 

 

3.Jafar Sadiq (27) S/o Amanulla, Backside Krishna Theatre, MosikeeranarVeethi, Indira

Nagar, Erode SDPI Member

 

RP 7065 – DOA: 26.09.22

 

 

4.Asiq Ali (28)

S/o Amanulla, Backside Krishna Theatre, MosikeeranarVeethi,

Indira Nagar, Erode  SDPI

Member

 

RP 7066 – DOA: 26.09.22

 

All the accused were arrested

 

Page No. 40

No. of Correction

15. Erode District

Puliyampatti                 PS

Cr.No.403/22 u/s 427, 435 IPC @ 427, 435, 153 (A) IPC & 4 of TNPPDL Act and 4(a) of IES Act.

24.09.2022 0100 hrs.

Arson attack The accused

petrol and set fire on the

car          of

(Former

Town Vice President,

BJP)           parked

Backside,      4th

Puliampatti

 

 

poured

Sivasekar

Puliampatti

SRT

Street,

1.Abdul Wahab (41), S/o Mohamed Sherif, 44/1, Rajaji

Street, Puliyampatti

PFI Member

 

2.Niyamathullah (46), S/o Basu, 53E, Rajaji Street, Puliyampatti

SDPI                       Bhavanisagar

Constituency President

 

3.Kamarudheen         (40),        S/o

ChellaRavuthar, CheranStreet, Puliyampatti PFI Member

(He       already     arrested       in

Puliyampatti Cr.No.400/22 u/s 286, 153 (A) IPC and remanded on 28.09.2022 @ 2330 hrs at

Sathy Sub Jai)

 

4.Mohamed Basheer (38),S/o Chellappa Ravuthar,6A Cheran Street, Puliyampatti.

SDPI Erode North District

Organizing Secretary

 

5.Amanulla (37), S/o Mohamed Sherif, SowdammanKovilVeethi,

PuliyampattiSDPIBhavanisagar

Constituency Vice President

Detained under NSA

16. Tiruppur City Nallur PS Cr.No.570/22 U/s.448, 427, 506(ii) IPC

@ 153A, 448, 427,506(!!) IPC r/w 3(1) of TNPPDL Act. D/O: 23.09.22 1340

Hrs

Stone Pelting

The accused pelted stones on the residence of Karuppaiah’s house and his car  when they asked  about the  Prabhu

(State                      Sports

Secretary, RSS)

A1-         Nijamudheen-41         s/o

Samsudheen,SugunapuramEast

,Kuniyamuthur, Cbe

SDPI MEMBER

 

Page No. 41

No. of Correction

 

 

      A2-Samsudheen        -34         s/o

Saleem,14/u,

6thStreet,AsathNagar,Karumbuk adai, Kuniyamuthur.Cbe City.

SDPI MEMBER.

17. Tiruppur                     city

Anupparpalayam        PS

Cr.No.694/ 2022 u/s 153

(A), 436 IPC r/w Sec 4 (a)

Explosive Substance Act

25.09.2022

230 hrs to 0500 hrs

Petrol Bomb:

The accused  thrown petrol filled bottle on the

residence                       of

Lakshmanan (former BJP Secretary), D.No.590/B, AVP

Layout, Angeripalayam

Road, Tiruppur

i)               Feroz Khan (32-A1-SDPI member)

Anna Nagar West, Tiruppur (Native of Palacode, Kerala state)

ii)              Syed Ibrahim

(A2-Tiruppur                       North

Constituency PRO, SDPI) of

Pandian Nagar, Tiruppur

18. Ramnad               District 

Kenikarai                     PS

Cr.No.597/2022, u/s 436 IPC  @  436, 448, 505 (i)b, 153 A, 120 (b) IPF

and 4 of TNPPDL Act

 

Police            arrested MohhammedAnsar of Lakshmipuram,

Thenkarai, Ramnad on 04.10.2022.

23.09.2022/

22.45hrs

Arson attack

The accused  set fire on the car of  one Manojkumar (BJP

Activist)       Government

Doctor,                        GH,

Ramanathapuram, parked near Lakshmi Hospital, situated near

Saithammal Higher Secondary School,

KenikaraiPS Limit

 

 

 

1.Syed Ibrahim Sha, 27/2022,

S/o  Gintha Mohammed,

E.No. 7/59,  Yadhavar Street,

Sakkarakottai,

Ramnad Cell:7845466344

(PFI Member) 

2.Abdul Azeez. S (PFI member) S/o Shadik

Batsha. J D.No. 3/121, Ariyakdi Village and Post, Paramakudi

TK, Ariyakudi, Ramanathapuram

Pin- 623527 Cell:6384779932

Now at :Omsakthi Nagar 13th

Street, Backside of Allwin School, RamnadDate of

Remand –  28.09.2022 /18.30 hrs at Ramnad District Jail  in NSA at Madurai Central Prison

 

 

Page No. 42 No. of Correction

 

          3.Abdul Hakkim 32/2022,

(PFI             member)              S/o

SeeniMohammedLakshmipuram

Oorani,             Ramanathapuram

District

Cell: 8667431416 –

4.Mohammed         Mansur,34/22,

(Sivagangai District President, PFI) S/o Mohammed Ibrahim,  D.No.5, Khan Sahib Street, Naganathapuram, Ramnad.

Post : PFI Sivagangai Dist.

President Cell:9894111902 –

 

5)Mohamed Ansar, 26/2022

S/o Sheik Syed Ali,

D.No4,

LakshimipuramThenkarai,

Ramanathapuram

(8220199903) –

ABSCONDER

Amjath Ali (PFI member) 24/2022, S/o  Kamal Mustafa, No. 23, Naganathapuram,

Ramanathapuram District

8148115146

19. Theni                   District, 

Chinnamanur  North 

PS Cr.No.454/2022 U/s

448,427,457  IPC

26.09.2022

Stone Pelting

Damage of all the glasses in TN-67-E-7092 Scorpio Car of one Prabakaran (BJP Rural Development State Executive Committee Member) is  found on 26.09.2022/

09.15 hrs  and  he is

going  to lodge complaint

 

 

 

Unknown persons

 

Page No. 43

No. of Correction

 

20. Dindigul

Dindigul Town South PS      Cr.No.213/2022

u/s.446, 447, 436 IPC @ 446, 447, 436, 153 (A)

IPC

 

24.09.2022/

03.30 hrs

District 

 

Arson attack

The accused  set fire on the Two wheelers and four wheelers parked  in a vacant land  (owns by

Senthil, Dindigul West

District Zonal President, BJP) ,

Kudaiparaipatti

Dindigul Town South PS

1.Sikkander, 29/2022,

S/o Sahul Hameed, D.No 29,

Pulavar Street, Begumbur, Dindigul [PFI member] –

IN      NSA    –    AT      MADURAI

CENTRAL PRISON

 

2.Mohammed Ilyas,29/22,

S/o Mohammed Hussain,

D.No. 39/44 , Water Tank Road

TVA Nagar, Batlagundu Road,

Begumbur,                         Dindigul

[PFI                member]                –

IN      NSA    –    AT      MADURAI

CENTRAL PRISON

 

ABSCONDING  ACCUSED

1.Sagabudeen,

Begambur, Dindigul

 

 

 

 

21. Madurai                       City 

Keeraithurai                  PS

Cr.No.564/2022 u/s 4 (a) Explosive Substances Act 1908 and Sec 4 of

TNPPDL Act

@ 4 (a) Explosive Substances Act 1908 and Sec 4 of TNPPDL

Act, 120 (b) IPC

24.09.2022/

19.30 hrs

Petrol Bomb

The accused  threw  petrol filled bottles   on

the three & four wheelers of one M.H.Krishnan (R.S.S. Anuppanadi Zonal  President)  parked near  his residence, TNHB

Colony,

Plot            No.            974,

Keeraithurai PS limit

 

 

 

1.Abuthagir, 31/2022, (SDPI

Ex-Madurai                        Central

Constituency Secretary), S/o Anwar Hussain, Singaravelar 7th

Street, Mahaboopalayam, Madurai  – NSA – INTERNED IN

MADURAI CENTRAL PRISON

 

 

Page No. 44

No. of Correction

 

22. Tambaram                     city

Chitlapakkam               PS

Cr.No.400/22 U/S 285 IPC & 3 of Explosive

Substance   Act      1908- 23.09.22

Petrol bomb

Petrol bomb was thrown in front of residence of Seetharaman

(Tambaram              Town

President, RSS), No. 19, Raja Rajeswari Nagar, Chitlapakkam PS limit,

Unknown persons  
23. Cuddalore district Parangipettai PS

Cr.No. 493/2022, u/s 436 IPC

29.09.22/ 0350 Hrs.

Petrol Bomb:

Unknown               persons

thrown Kerosene filled bottle on the Mahendira Jeep TN-05-AA 379, belonging to one Seenu

@ Ramadoss

Unknown persons  
24. Salem City

Ammapet            

Cr.No.518/2022

436,511 IPC  25.09.22/

0145 Hrs.

PS u/s Petrol Bomb:

The accused threw  one kerosene filled bottle on the residence  of Rajan (Rajan (Sowrashtra), Salem Town Social harmony co-ordinator, RSS), No.114/

49,ParamakudiNannusa my street, Ammapettai,

Salem city

 

 

1) Syed Ali (42)

S/o.NagoorMaitheen,

No.747,

Onthapillaikadu,

Patchampatti,

Kitchipalayam-       SDPI Dist. President.

 

2)Kadhar Hussain (33)

S/o. KajaMaitheen,

No.49E, Thippu Nagar,

Ponnammapettai, Salem – SDPI – Salem 34- Branch President.

Salem

Ward

25. Kanyakumari           District

Mandaikadu                  PS

Cr.No.52/22 u/s 436, 427

IPC  24.09.2022

22.50 Hrs.

Petrol Bomb

The accused thrown petrol bombs (2) on the

residence                        of

Kalyanasundram,        BJP

Sympathizer,

Karumankudal,

Mandaikadu PS

 

1.           Musamil, PFI member,  s/o Shahul Hameed,

EllapuvilaiColachel.

2.           Majeed Al Raseen 22/22, CFI member s/o Mahin 12/170, Aravilai, Manavalakurichi (arrested on 10.10.2022)

3.           Riswan Mohammed 27/22, PFI member s/o Beer Mohammed 12/1146,

SalathivilaiManavalakurichi

 

Page No. 45 No. of Correction

 

       

Absconding accused

4 Muhammed Nafeel, s/o Abdul Khader, Manavalakurichi.

5.  AdhilIman s/o Mujeebur Rahman, Manavalakurichi.

6.Abdul         Khader          27/22            PFI member,

7.              Ansad PFI Member s/o Kajid

8.              Azeem, PFI member s/o Syed

Ali

9.              Asiq Mohammed Siraj PFI member s/o Sahul Hammed

26. Thoothukudi           district

ThoothukudiNorthPSC

r.No. 463/22 u/s 436, 511 IPC (DO: 25.09.22 at 22.25 hrs, DR: 25.09.22 at 23.15 hrs,  25.09.2022

Petrol Bomb:

Unknown persons thrown Kerosene filled bottle on a Omni Bus at Service Road, (Under the bridge) Near Thoothukudi New Bus Stand, (TN 69 BP 3735 – owns by Vivekam G. Ramesh’s, State Vice President, BJP OBC Wing), but it fell on the road.

No damage to bus

Unknown persons

 

*******

 

DETAILS OF DAMAGED GOVERNMENT BUSES AFTER PFI RAIDS AS ON

14.10.2022

 

 

Sl.

No.

City/District             / 

Cr.No.      date       of

Incident

No of Govt buses damaged Accused details
1. Coimbatore city

Ukkadam              PS

Cr.No.192/2022 u/s

3 of TNPPDL Act,

1

In front of Ganapathy Silk Park, NH road

Ukkadam     PS       limit,

Coimbatore city,

Shajahan of South Ukkadam,

Coimbatore city (PFI member)

 

 

Page No. 46

No. of Correction

 

2. Coimbatore city Kuniyamuthur PS

Cr. No.443/2022 u/s

3 (1) of TNPPDL Act

1

Puttu       Vikki        road,

Kuniyamuthur PS limit,

Coimbatore city,

A1 Idhris (43), S/o Abdul Rahman, Near Green Park, Podanur, Coimbatore &82, Thunikkadai Back side,

Saramedu, Karumbukadai CBE

PFI Member

RP No.5659

DOA: 28.09.22

A2 Mohamed Sharuk (27),

S/o Sadhakathulla, D.No.100, Vallal Nagar, Saramedu,

Karumbukkadai, Coimbatore &164, Saramedu Main road,Siraj Nagar,

Karumbukadai, CBE

 

PFI IT Wing Member

RP No.5658

DOA: 28.09.22

3. Thiruvarur District –

Thiruvarur Town PS 348/2022 u/s

3(1) of PPDL Act.

22.09.2022

 

3

 

New       Bus         Stand

Thiruvarur, Thiruvarur

Town PS

1.Mohammed Sahul Hameed

(PFI town organizer)

 

2.Ahamathullah                 (SDPI

member)

 

3.Bashid  (absconding)

 

4.                              Mohammed

MaqdumMagadeer            (SDPI

member)

 

5.Haja Nawaz (SDPI member)

 

6.Mohammed               Yameen,

Thiruvarur District Co-ordinator, CFI

 

 

Page No. 47 No. of Correction

 

4. Thanjavur district

Sethubavachattiram PS Cr.No.470/2022 u/s 3 (1) of TNPPDL

Act- was altered to 3 (1) of TNPPDL Act @ 3 (1) of TNPPDL Act 1984, 336, 120

B IPC

1

MaraikkaValasaiKalath uMedu Bus Stop Near,

Sethubavachathiram

PS

 

1)      Ahmed Saleem, PFI Member

 

2)      Halidh PFI Member

 

3)      Siraj @ Sirajudeen PFI

Member

 

4)      SugarnoPFI Member

5)Abdulla  PFI Member (AB)

6)J.Malick SDPI Thanjavur District Fisher Man Wing

Secretary (AB)

7)Aliusman, PFI Member

(Absconding) Mallipattinam

 

5. Thanjavur districtSethubavac

hanthiram             PS

Cr.No.471/2022 u/s 324 IPC and 3(1) of

PPDL

Act.22.09.2022

1

ErandamPulikadu Bus

Stop                      Near,

Sethubavachathiram

6. Thanjavur districtAdhirampatti nam    PS Cr.No.587/2022 u/s 3(1) of PPDL Act.

 

1

NaduvaikkaduKaliamm

anKovil                  Near,

Adhirampattinam PS

 

Unknown person

7. Thanjavur districtAdhirampatti nam    PS Cr.No.588/2022 u/s 3(1) of PPDL Act. 1

Shipa Hospital Near,

Adhirampattinam,

Adhirampattinam PS

 

Unknown person

8. Thanjavur districtAdhirampatti nam    PS Cr.No.589/2022 u/s 3(1) of PPDL Act. 1

Adhirampattinam

Karaiyur Street, MariammanKovil Arch Near, Adhirampattinam

PS

 

Unknown person

9. Thanjavur districtThiruchitram

balam            PS Cr.No.396/2022 u/s 3(1) of PPDL Act.

 

1

MelaOttangadu Poo Mariamman Temple

Thiruchitrambalam PS

 

Unknown person

 

Page No. 48 No. of Correction

 

10. Thanjavur district

Pattukottai Taluk PS Cr.No.585/2022 u/s 341, 332 IPC and 3(1) of PPDL Act.

1

SeethampalpuramNari yaru, Pattukottai Taluk

PS

 

Unknown person

11. Thanjavur district

Pattukottai Taluk PS Cr.No.586/2022 u/s 341, 332 IPC and 3(1) of PPDL Act.

 

1

AlivalamAnjaneyar

Temple                  Near,

Pattukottai Taluk PS

 

Unknown person

12. Perambalur

district

Kaikalathur           PS

Cr.No.148/2022 u/s 341 IPC and 3 of PPDL Act, 1992,

323, 324, 506(ii) IPC

1

Venbavur,        Ashokan

Land Near,

Kaikalathur PS

 

Unknown person

 

******

ABSTRACT

 

S No. City/District /  Cr.No. No of accused  No. of accused bail  and released
Details of case related to hurling petrol bomb / arson / stone pelting incidents  
1. Coimbatore   district           Pollachi         West            PS Cr.No.256/22  

6

5
2. Coimbatore     district     Pollachi     West      PS

Cr.No.257/22

3. Coimbatore     district     Pollachi     West      PS

Cr.No.258/22

4. Coimbatore        district        Pollachi         West

PS.Cr.No.259/22,

5. Coimbatore district Pollachi West PS Cr.No. 260/22
6. Erode Taluk PS Cr.No.339/2022 4 4
7. Coimbatore city – Kattur PS Cr.No.478/22 2

 

Page No. 49

No. of Correction

8. Coimbatore      district      Mettupalayam       PS

Cr.No.761/22

 

4

3
9. Coimbatore      district      Mettupalayam       PS

Cr.No.762/22

10. Coimbatore city VH Road PS Cr.No.182/22 2
11. Coimbatore city Rathinapuri PS Cr.No.489/22 2 2
12. Coimbatore city Kuniamuthur PS Cr.No.445/22  

4

3
13. Coimbatore city Kuniamuthur PS Cr.No.447/22
14. Coimbatore city Kuniamuthur PS Cr.No.446/22 1 (Also involved in

445 & 447)

1
15. Ramand district Kenikarai PS Cr.No.597/2022 5 3
16. Tiruppur city Nallur PS Cr.No.570/22 2 2
17. Tambaram        city        Chitlapakkam          PS

Cr.No.400/22

Unknown person(s)
18. Dindigul district Dindigul Town South PS

Cr.No.213/2022

3 (1- absconding) 2
19. Madurai city Keeraithurai PS Cr.No.564/2022 4 3
20. Salem City Ammapet  PS Cr.No.518/2022 2
21. Kanyakumari      district      Mandaikadu        PS

Cr.No.52/22

9 (6 absconding) 2
22. Erode district Puliyampatti PS Cr.No.403/22 5 3

 

Page No. 50

No. of Correction

23. Tiruppur city Anupparpalayam PS Cr.No.694/

2022

2
24. ThoothukudiNorth  PSCr.No. 463/22 Unknown person(s)
25. Theni District,  Chinnamanur  North   PS

Cr.No.454/2022

Unknown person(s)
26. Cuddalore district Parangipettai PS Cr.No.

493/2022,

Unknown person(s)
Damage caused to Government buses    
27. Thiruvarur      district    Thiruvarur    Town      PS

348/2022

6 6
28. Thanjavur district Sethubavachattiram PS

Cr.No.470/2022

 

7 (1 absconding)

5
29. Thanjavur district Sethubavachattiram PS

Cr.No. 471/2022

30. Thanjavur          district

Cr.No.587/2022

Adhirampattinam PS Unknown person(s)
31. Thanjavur          district

Cr.No.588/2022

Adhirampattinam PS Unknown person(s)
32. Thanjavur          district

Cr.No.589/2022

Adhirampattinam PS Unknown person(s)
33. Thanjavur      district

Cr.No.396/2022

Thiruchitrambalam PS Unknown person(s)
34. Thanjavur      district

Cr.No.585/2022

Pattukottai    Taluk PS Unknown person(s)
35. Thanjavur      district

Cr.No.586/2022

Pattukottai    Taluk PS Unknown person(s)
36. Perambalur district           Kaikalathur Cr.No.148/2022 PS Unknown person(s)
37. Coimbatore city Ukkadam PS Cr.No.192/2022 1 1
38. Coimbatore city      Kuniyamuthur          PS          Cr. No.443/2022 2 2
  Total 73 5 absconding) 47

 

Page No. 51

No. of Correction

 

  1. I submit that the representation given by some Petitioners to conduct the route march do not have a common purpose, for instance in the following writ petitions the purpose of the procession sought in the representation varies

WP no. 25089/22 – Cont.P.  – 2324/22 – 75th year of independence day, B.R.Ambedkar , Vijayadashami,  W.P.no- 25437/22 – Cont.P  –

2334/22 – mic set and stage for public meeting, W.P.no. 24547/22 –

Cont.P   2335/22 – Vijaya Dashami, W.P.no. 25393/22:-

Cont.P   2243/22 – Vijayadashami, Gandhi Jayanti

  1. I submit that, under the guise of celebrating the leader’s birthday and 75th year of Independence the petitioners have sought for procession followed by the public meeting. I further submit that the petitioner organization had never celebrated Gandhi Jayanthi or Dr.Ambedkar Jayanthi. In order to seek permission for procession where they carry arms like lathis and sticks they have camouflaged the same with leader’s birthday only in order to mislead this court and get permission to conduct procession.
  2. I submit that the petitioner’s organization had earlier filed a Writ Petition No.34440 to 34053 of 2016 and W.P.No. 637 to 641 of 2017 to conduct the procession and in these Writ petitions the petitioner’s organization had never mentioned about celebrating Gandhi Jayanthi or AmbedkarJayanthi etc. The petitioner has camouflaged the reasons in the present petition only to seek permission for possession.  The petitioner has come before this Court with unclean hands and wanted to get permission by misleading this Hon’ble Court.

 

Page No. 52

No. of Correction

 

  1. I submit that recently the similar procession was requested by President of Valparai Dravida Thotta Tholilalar Munnetra Sangam to conduct procession to address their grievances on the revised wages. They had requested for the procession starting right from Valparai to Coimbatore Collector Office which extended upto 105 Kms. The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore and   Superintendent   of Police, Coimbatore Districts had rejected this representation stating Law and Order situation and other practical difficulties in conducting procession. A contempt was also filed before this court and the same was rejected by this Court concluding that there was no willful disobedience of the courts orders in not granting permission.
  2. I submit that this LPA has been filed against the order in the Contempt Petition where it was held there was no willful disobedience on the part of the authorities and consequently also order in the petitioner’s favorto conduct procession followed by the Public meeting on 06.11.2022 which was cancelled for the reasons best known by the Petitioners organizations.
  3. I submit that as alleged by the petitioners if any right has been violated or inconvenience has been caused the same is not final or prejudicial to the rights of the petitioners the same cannot be challenged by way of filing an LPA.

Page No. 53

No. of Correction

In the above circumstances it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the Letter Patent Appeals filed by the petitioners as not maintainable and devoid of merits and thus render

justice.

 

 

Solemnly affirmed at Chennai              () this the19th day of January, 2023        () and signed his name in my presence   ()                  BEFORE ME

 

 

ADVOCATE, MADRAS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page No. 54

No. of Correction

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Call Now ButtonCALL ME