You may also like...
-
-
Vinothpandian: Madras high court : SA ( MD ) no 1203 of 2005 dated 4th nov 2025 : M Sasankan and others vs D muthuganesan : Registered documents hold greater evidentiary value than certificates issued by municipalities for determining the date of death in cases pertaining to Hindu succession act 1956
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 17, 2025
-
Chennai consumer court order / petner advocate TKS Gandhi against Airtell / In the result, the complaint is allowed. (i) We direct the 1st to 4th Opposite Parties jointly or severally to pay a sum of Rs.7,000/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Only) collected as excess with 18% from the date of complaint. (ii) To pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) for mental agony, harassment causing disruption in business communication, deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 11, 2025