Skip to content

Search for:

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Court News from Madras High Court

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Uncategorized

PUDUCHERRYHigh Court reserves verdict in cash-for-rice case

by Sekar Reporter · February 14, 2020

15

Ad

Ad

NEWS
CITIES
PUDUCHERRY
PUDUCHERRYHigh Court reserves verdict in cash-for-rice case

Chief Minister V. Narayanasamy presenting a Bill during the special session of the Assembly. T. Singaravelou
Legal CorrespondentCHENNAI 14 FEBRUARY 2020 06:50 ISTUPDATED: 14 FEBRUARY 2020 07:53 IST
Ad

The Additional Solicitor General accused the Chief Minister of having filed the case with the intention of preventing the people from receiving cash.
The Madras High Court on Thursday reserved its judgment on a writ petition filed by Puducherry Chief Minister V. Narayanasamy challenging an advisory issued by the Centre last month for continuing the practice of transferring cash instead of free distribution of rice to ration card holders.
Justice C.V. Karthikeyan deferred his verdict after hearing elaborate arguments advanced by senior counsel A.R.L. Sundaresan and T.R. Rajagopalan for the petitioner, Additional Solicitor General G. Rajagopalan for the Centre and senior counsel A.L. Somayaji representing Lieutenant Governor Kiran Bedi.
While the Chief Minister asserted that the decision to distribute free rice was backed an unanimous resolution passed by the Legislative Assembly, the Centre questioned the very maintainability of the case and claimed that the Chief Minister of a Union Territory was not entitled to file a case against the Centre since both of them were not distinct entities.

You may also like...

Madras HC orders strict action against cops seeking bribes from kin of prisoners out on parole

July 24, 2020

by Sekar Reporter · Published July 24, 2020
Madras high court news

August 3, 2021

by Sekar Reporter · Published August 3, 2021
We are not going to rely on newspapers to arrive at judicial decisions”, the Supreme Court said on Tuesday when a petitioner referred to media reports about statement of vice-chancellor of Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) on the alleged police atrocities on students protesting against the

December 19, 2019

by Sekar Reporter · Published December 19, 2019

Follow:

Next story [2/14, 10:41] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1228184336584699904?s=08 [2/14, 10:41] Sekarreporter: Sir yesterday court hall 34 : item 37 : suit against AR Murugadoss , lyca productions , (Film Kathi) : copy righted case : justice Jayachandran : compared the plaintiff script & viewed film & dismissed the suit Pl Narayanan sir argued
Previous story Rs 10K cost imposed for wasting court’s time – https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2020/feb/14/rs-10k-cost-imposed-for-wasting-courts-time-2103046.html

Search for:

Recent Posts

[25/04, 22:05] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 22:02] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1783534512955375768?t=Opq2sGBj6wcjWdqoFNpmpg&s=08[25/04, 22:03] sekarreporter1: Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Bar Association (MMBA) elections held today (25.04.2024). Mr. Isaac Mohanlal elected as President and Mr. M. Saravanakumar elected as Secretary.[25/04, 22:03] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹🌹[25/04, 22:17] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 22:12] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1783536840651468980?t=YtRNZUV3Km0w4IH2cb56jw&s=08[25/04, 22:12] sekarreporter1: Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Bar Association (MMBA) elections held today (25.04.2024). Mr. M. Saravanakumar elected as Secretary.
Cont.P.N0.1538 ofCon(.1′.N0.1538 of 2023w.p.Nos.M429, & 31440 or 2023.p.Nos.149(), 1494, 1495, 1496, 1498, 1502, 1503 & 1506 of 2924S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.The Special Officer now appointed by the Government states that she attend’Kalaimaghal Sabha’ Mr.R.Singaravelan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would oppose by stating that it is a statutory appointment to deal with several crores of public money, where large scale irregularities and illegalities are identified. Therefore, appointment of Special Officer to work one day in a week would be in-sufficient to deal with the affairs of ‘Kalaimaghal Sabha.’ That apart, the Special Officer has to give evidences before the Civil Courts, where suits are pending for recovery of money, property etc., wherein several crores of rupees are involved.
Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy noted that on verifying the challenged order it is proved that the respondent regarded the timely payment of the applicant of the due amounts for the variance between the GSTR 1 and 3B dated January 9, 2023. Even after the consideration the respondent incorrectly mentioned on Page 23 of the transcript that levied entity loses to settle tax liabilities within 15 days of obtaining the notice on 17th March 2023. The same claim opposes the documented proof.
Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala released a directory of designated senior advocates brought out by Tamil Nadu Senior Advocates Forum and Justice R. Mahadevan, the seniormost judge of the High Court, received the first copy in Chennai on April 24, 2024
today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes 134 SC : Ahmad Ali quraishi vs state of Uttar pradesh : Rejection.of application under section.156(3) CRPC does not preclude a complainant to file a complaint under section 200 CRPC

More

Recent Posts

[25/04, 22:05] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 22:02] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1783534512955375768?t=Opq2sGBj6wcjWdqoFNpmpg&s=08[25/04, 22:03] sekarreporter1: Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Bar Association (MMBA) elections held today (25.04.2024). Mr. Isaac Mohanlal elected as President and Mr. M. Saravanakumar elected as Secretary.[25/04, 22:03] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹🌹[25/04, 22:17] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 22:12] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1783536840651468980?t=YtRNZUV3Km0w4IH2cb56jw&s=08[25/04, 22:12] sekarreporter1: Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Bar Association (MMBA) elections held today (25.04.2024). Mr. M. Saravanakumar elected as Secretary.
Cont.P.N0.1538 ofCon(.1′.N0.1538 of 2023w.p.Nos.M429, & 31440 or 2023.p.Nos.149(), 1494, 1495, 1496, 1498, 1502, 1503 & 1506 of 2924S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.The Special Officer now appointed by the Government states that she attend’Kalaimaghal Sabha’ Mr.R.Singaravelan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would oppose by stating that it is a statutory appointment to deal with several crores of public money, where large scale irregularities and illegalities are identified. Therefore, appointment of Special Officer to work one day in a week would be in-sufficient to deal with the affairs of ‘Kalaimaghal Sabha.’ That apart, the Special Officer has to give evidences before the Civil Courts, where suits are pending for recovery of money, property etc., wherein several crores of rupees are involved.
Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy noted that on verifying the challenged order it is proved that the respondent regarded the timely payment of the applicant of the due amounts for the variance between the GSTR 1 and 3B dated January 9, 2023. Even after the consideration the respondent incorrectly mentioned on Page 23 of the transcript that levied entity loses to settle tax liabilities within 15 days of obtaining the notice on 17th March 2023. The same claim opposes the documented proof.
Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala released a directory of designated senior advocates brought out by Tamil Nadu Senior Advocates Forum and Justice R. Mahadevan, the seniormost judge of the High Court, received the first copy in Chennai on April 24, 2024
today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes 134 SC : Ahmad Ali quraishi vs state of Uttar pradesh : Rejection.of application under section.156(3) CRPC does not preclude a complainant to file a complaint under section 200 CRPC

SEKAR REPORTER © 2024. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by - Designed with the Hueman theme