Prayer THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.18711 of 2025 Prakash Ramachandran S/o V.S.Ramachandran .. Petitioner

by Sekar Reporter · January 20, 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.07.2025

CORAM :

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

W.P.No.18711 of 2025

Prakash Ramachandran S/o V.S.Ramachandran .. Petitioner

1. The District Collector

Office of the District Collectorate

GST Road

Chengalpattu 603 001

2. The Inspector of Police

Law and Order

T-13, Chitlapakkam Police Station

Chennai 600 064

3. The Commissioner

Tambaram Corporation

28, Muthurengam Street

Tambaram West, Chennai 600 045

4. Global Organisation for Divinity (GOD) Having Head Office at:

4/11, Nethaji Nagar Main Road

Nethaji Nagar, Jafferkhanpet

Chennai 600 083

Presently functioning also at:

No.29, Krishnamachari Street

Radha Nagar, Chrompet Chennai 600 044

5. T.S.Subramanian .. Respondents

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to forthwith take appropriate action against the 4^th respondent by considering the petitioner’s representations dated 03.06.2024, 03.07.2024, 22.08.2024, 02.09.2024, 24.09.2024, 14.11.2024 and 19.02.2025.

For Petitioner

Mr.S.Shivram

For Respondents

Mr.P.Ganesan

Additional Government Pleader for R1

Mr.R.Venkatesh Perumal Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R2

Dr.T.Seenivasan

Special Government Pleader for R3 Ms.Saughanthika A.S, Harshini for Mr.K.Gowtham Kumar for R4 & R5

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the private respondents based on the representation made by the petitioner, wherein the petitioner is complaining that the private respondents are having a prayer hall and causing nuisance to the neighbours, without getting prior permission from the District Collector.

2. The fifth respondent has filed a detailed counter affidavit running to 35 paragraphs. The fifth respondent has taken a stand that the religious rights are safeguarded under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution of India and that uttering the name of God will provide peace of mind and will help people stay calm and free them from all trouble and sorrows that might afflict them.

3. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties.

4. The fifth respondent has flatly given his opinion about the Nama Sankeerthanam that is done in the subject premises. What sounds to the fifth respondent as divine, is causing nuisance to the petitioner. It is further stated by the fifth respondent that he has the consent of all the other neighbours to conduct the Nama Sankeerthanam.

5. In the considered view of this Court, whenever a residential premises is attempted to be converted as a prayer hall, it requires the permission of the District Collector. This position of law has been reiterated in various orders passed by this Court.

6. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private respondents submitted that they have already submitted an application before the District Collector seeking for permission and the same is pending.

7. It is quite evident from the above submission that till date, no permission has been given by the District Collector. Therefore, till such a permission is obtained, the fifth respondent cannot convert the residential premises into a prayer hall. If at all any prayers are conducted, the same should confine inside the house without causing nuisance to anyone. That apart, by inviting huge crowds for prayer, the street cannot be clogged with vehicles, which once again causes nuisance to the road users and also the neighbours. This shall be kept in mind by the fourth and fifth respondents.

8. The second respondent shall ensure that no nuisance is caused by the fourth and fifth respondents and they do not convert the residential premises into a prayer hall. Till the permission is given by the District Collector, the fourth and fifth respondents shall not use the residential premises as a prayer hall. This shall be ensured by the second respondent.

9. This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

Index : yes/no 16.07.2025 Neutral citation : yes/no