You may also like...
-
Nalini case full order of THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No.7615 of 2022 S.Nalini the Petitioner : Mr.M.Radhakrishnan For the Respondents : Mr.R.Shunmugasundaram Advocate-General Mr.P.Muthukumar State Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and Ms.A.G.Shakeenaa : Mr.Hasan Mohammed Jinnah State Public Prosecutor Mr.Muniyapparaj Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr.S.Santosh Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for respondent No.2 ORDER THE CHIEF JUSTICE
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 17, 2022
-
[8/18, 10:42] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1295589284435472384?s=08 [8/18, 10:42] Sekarreporter 1: [8/18, 10:41] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC refuses to allow reopening of Sterlite copper smelting plant in Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu [8/18, 10:41] Sekarreporter 1: வேதாந்தா வழக்குகள் தள்ளுபடி
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 18, 2020
-
*Madras High Court* – *Case No.:* CRP(PD) No. 2442 of 2024 – *Judge:* P.B. BALAJI, J. – *Parties:* – Petitioners/Plaintiffs: Not Available – Respondents/Defendants: 1. Not Available, 2. Not Available – *Date of Order:* Not Available – *Counsel:* – For Petitioners: Mr.V.Raghavachari, Senior Counsel for Mr.Avinash Wadhwani – For Respondents: Mr.P.Sesubalan Raja for M/s.ASN.Atthik Legal Solutions for R1, No appearance for R2 – *Court Observation:* The Madras High Court allowed the Civil Revision Petition, setting aside the order directing impleadment of the 1st respondent as a defendant in the suit. The court held that the 1st respondent is neither a proper nor necessary party to the suit, and the doctrine of lis pendens applies.
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 4, 2025