*Madras High Court* – *Case No.:* CRP(PD) No. 2442 of 2024 – *Judge:* P.B. BALAJI, J. – *Parties:* – Petitioners/Plaintiffs: Not Available – Respondents/Defendants: 1. Not Available, 2. Not Available – *Date of Order:* Not Available – *Counsel:* – For Petitioners: Mr.V.Raghavachari, Senior Counsel for Mr.Avinash Wadhwani – For Respondents: Mr.P.Sesubalan Raja for M/s.ASN.Atthik Legal Solutions for R1, No appearance for R2 – *Court Observation:* The Madras High Court allowed the Civil Revision Petition, setting aside the order directing impleadment of the 1st respondent as a defendant in the suit. The court held that the 1st respondent is neither a proper nor necessary party to the suit, and the doctrine of lis pendens applies.

*Madras High Court*

– *Case No.:* CRP(PD) No. 2442 of 2024
– *Judge:* P.B. BALAJI, J.
– *Parties:*
– Petitioners/Plaintiffs: Not Available
– Respondents/Defendants: 1. Not Available, 2. Not Available
– *Date of Order:* Not Available
– *Counsel:*
– For Petitioners: Mr.V.Raghavachari, Senior Counsel for Mr.Avinash Wadhwani
– For Respondents: Mr.P.Sesubalan Raja for M/s.ASN.Atthik Legal Solutions for R1, No appearance for R2
– *Court Observation:*
The Madras High Court allowed the Civil Revision Petition, setting aside the order directing impleadment of the 1st respondent as a defendant in the suit. The court held that the 1st respondent is neither a proper nor necessary party to the suit, and the doctrine of lis pendens applies.

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com