Pm called chief of sc
Follow:
- Next story Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan observed that the court cannot ignore the missing specifics in the FIR which is the basic premise for invoking the criminal machinery of the State.
- Previous story AIR 2016 MAD 167 : candida Justina vs sunder babu : willful non – consummation of marriage by wife amounts to mental cruetly to husband
Recent Posts
- *Breaking: _“Atrocious” – SC stays Madras HC order barring TVK MLA Sethupathi from floor test*_ *Supreme Court | May 13, 2026 | Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, Vijay Bishnoi*
- BREAKING: Supreme Court stays Madras High Court order restraining TVK MLA R Sreenivasa Sethupathi from voting in any floor test, trust vote, confidence motion or no-confidence motion in the Tamil Nadu Assembly. Court says order is “Atrocious”
- [13/05, 11:38] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: The appointment of an OSD is a contractual post covered by Article 310 of the constitution.The case law cited refers to a constituted service under article 309 and has no relevance to the case on hand.You can’t intimidate a govt with filing such cases without updating with constitutional law. [13/05, 11:39]
- The appointment is therefore arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, contrary to the law laid down in Uma Devi, and liable to be interfered with under Article 226 of the Constitution. Dated at Chennai on this the day of May, 2026
- TOI: _AIADMK Defection – Anti-Defection Law Explained, MLA Disqualification Looms*_ *Richardson Wilson | May 12, 2026, 23:59 IST* *1. What triggered this?* On May 12, a faction of *AIADMK MLAs led by S P Velumani & C Ve Shanmugam* defied party chief *Edappadi K Palaniswami (EPS)* and
More
Recent Posts
- *Breaking: _“Atrocious” – SC stays Madras HC order barring TVK MLA Sethupathi from floor test*_ *Supreme Court | May 13, 2026 | Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, Vijay Bishnoi*
- BREAKING: Supreme Court stays Madras High Court order restraining TVK MLA R Sreenivasa Sethupathi from voting in any floor test, trust vote, confidence motion or no-confidence motion in the Tamil Nadu Assembly. Court says order is “Atrocious”
- [13/05, 11:38] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: The appointment of an OSD is a contractual post covered by Article 310 of the constitution.The case law cited refers to a constituted service under article 309 and has no relevance to the case on hand.You can’t intimidate a govt with filing such cases without updating with constitutional law. [13/05, 11:39]
- The appointment is therefore arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, contrary to the law laid down in Uma Devi, and liable to be interfered with under Article 226 of the Constitution. Dated at Chennai on this the day of May, 2026
- TOI: _AIADMK Defection – Anti-Defection Law Explained, MLA Disqualification Looms*_ *Richardson Wilson | May 12, 2026, 23:59 IST* *1. What triggered this?* On May 12, a faction of *AIADMK MLAs led by S P Velumani & C Ve Shanmugam* defied party chief *Edappadi K Palaniswami (EPS)* and