Pm called chief of sc
Follow:
- Next story Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan observed that the court cannot ignore the missing specifics in the FIR which is the basic premise for invoking the criminal machinery of the State.
- Previous story AIR 2016 MAD 167 : candida Justina vs sunder babu : willful non – consummation of marriage by wife amounts to mental cruetly to husband
Recent Posts
- The Madurai bench of Madras High Court held that one-year practice before the income tax authorities is mandatory for registration as Income Tax Practitioner (ITP). The court upheld the decision of the authorities to return an application
- Madras High Court Dismisses Intellectual Property Suit Against Tamil Film ‘Saamaniyan’ After Release
- O.A.No.61 of 2023 in the instant suit. It is further brought to the notice of this Court that the film had been released as early as in the year 2024 and in that regard, the prayer sought for by the plaintiff had become infructuous. The plaintiff had not taken any steps in the manner known to law for the amendment of the reliefs. 3. In view of the same, invoking Order XV Rule 1 of CPC, this Court is of the view that there is no issue to be adjudicated
- Election for the office bearers to THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK OTHER BACKWARD CLASS OFFICERS AND AWARD STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION scheduled to be held at Madurai on 26th & 27th June of 2026 whereof disgruntled member filed a suit before XII Assistant Civil Court Chennai and sought for injunction not to hold election which came up on
- மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் அசன் முகம்மது ஜின்னா மற்றும் வழக்கறிஞர் தாமோதரன் ஆஜரான வழக்கில் தீர்ப்பு.*
More
Recent Posts
- The Madurai bench of Madras High Court held that one-year practice before the income tax authorities is mandatory for registration as Income Tax Practitioner (ITP). The court upheld the decision of the authorities to return an application
- Madras High Court Dismisses Intellectual Property Suit Against Tamil Film ‘Saamaniyan’ After Release
- O.A.No.61 of 2023 in the instant suit. It is further brought to the notice of this Court that the film had been released as early as in the year 2024 and in that regard, the prayer sought for by the plaintiff had become infructuous. The plaintiff had not taken any steps in the manner known to law for the amendment of the reliefs. 3. In view of the same, invoking Order XV Rule 1 of CPC, this Court is of the view that there is no issue to be adjudicated
- Election for the office bearers to THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK OTHER BACKWARD CLASS OFFICERS AND AWARD STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION scheduled to be held at Madurai on 26th & 27th June of 2026 whereof disgruntled member filed a suit before XII Assistant Civil Court Chennai and sought for injunction not to hold election which came up on
- மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் அசன் முகம்மது ஜின்னா மற்றும் வழக்கறிஞர் தாமோதரன் ஆஜரான வழக்கில் தீர்ப்பு.*