You may also like...
-
-
[4/28, 09:13] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1254979437335998464?s=08 [4/28, 09:13] Sekarreporter: [4/28, 09:02] Mhc Advt Maharaja Advt: Dr.Krishnamoorthy & another ..vs.. A.Tamilarasu. IPC.Sec.153..A,500,501,(b),502(b),504 & 505. DEFAMATION. Publication of false article in a Newspaper…No malafide .intention can be attributed. Freedom of speech and expression is not absolute and is always subjected to reasonable restriction quash petition allowed.(MDIJ) Reported in 2020(1)TNLJ 39 [4/28, 09:12] Sekarreporter: 🌹🌹
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 28, 2020
-
Justice N Anand Venkatesh quashed the FIR on applying Section 95 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which exempts acts causing slight harm from criminal liability. In doing so, the Judge also opined that while the State may establish TASMAC shops as a matter of policy, people have equal rights to oppose the same.
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 16, 2021