SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

[2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: On Wednesday the Supreme Court Collegium Recommended names for Appointment of Chief Justices in Patna, Himachal Pradesh, Gauhati, and Tripura High Court. [2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: .

Uncategorized

[2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: On Wednesday the Supreme Court Collegium Recommended names for Appointment of Chief Justices in Patna, Himachal Pradesh, Gauhati, and Tripura High Court. [2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: .

[2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: On Wednesday the Supreme Court Collegium Recommended names for Appointment of Chief Justices in Patna, Himachal Pradesh, Gauhati, and Tripura High Court. [2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: .

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.595 of 2016 Thiruselvam .. Appellant In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan Vs. Kattukandi Edathil Valsan4, the Original Suit in O.S.No.196 of 2013 is posted for further hearing on 20.01.2023 and it is made clear that the parties shall appear before the Trial Court for continuation of proceedings without any further notice and the Trial Court shall proceed with the final decree proceedings, if an application for final decree is already pending and even if there is no application pending, proceed further without waiting for the parties to file any such application and effect the final division as per the preliminary decree and grant separate possession to the plaintiff.

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.595 of 2016 Thiruselvam .. Appellant In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan Vs. Kattukandi Edathil Valsan4, the Original Suit in O.S.No.196 of 2013 is posted for further hearing on 20.01.2023 and it is made clear that the parties shall appear before the Trial Court for continuation of proceedings without any further notice and the Trial Court shall proceed with the final decree proceedings, if an application for final decree is already pending and even if there is no application pending, proceed further without waiting for the parties to file any such application and effect the final division as per the preliminary decree and grant separate possession to the plaintiff.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 02.12.2022 PRONOUNCED ON : 19.12.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.595 of 2016 Thiruselvam .. Appellant Vs. Chidambaram .. Respondent Prayer:...

Uncategorized

Justice anitha sumanth There was nothing that prevented the assessing officer to have called for objections, assigning a time limit to the assessee to file the same, and disposed the objections expeditiously. The procedure set out in the case of GKN Drive shafts (India) Ltd (supra) nowhere envisages modification/expansion of the statutory limitations under the Act. 28. In light of the detailed discussion as above as well as the legal position that has been settled in several judgments discussed in the preceding paragraphs, impugned notice under Section 148 dated 12.12.2019, order dated 23.07.2021 and reference to TPO on 24.11.2020 stand vitiated by non-issue of notice under Section 143(2) of the Act and the same are quashed. 29. These Writ Petitions are allowed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 16.11.2022 Index : Yes Speaking Order sl To 1.Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, International Taxation Circle-1(1), BSNL Building, 4th Floor, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 2.Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Transfer Pricing Officer -1(1), BSNL Building, 5th Floor, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. sl W.P.Nos.22661 & 22667 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.23902, 23903, 23904, 23907, 23908, 23909 & 23910 of 2021 & WMP.Nos.730, 731, 732 & 733 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 16.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.Nos.22661 & 22667 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.23902, 23903, 23904, 23907, 23908, 23909 & 23910 of 2021 &...

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135 of 2021 Answers to the Issues : 20. In view of my answers to the questions, I find that the findings and conclusions reached by the Trial Court in respect of issue No.1, in the Original Suit, that the defendants 1 and 2 have borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 15.06.1999 and 20.09.1999 respectively, as correct. I also concur with the Trial Court in answering issue No.2, in the Original Suit

Uncategorized

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135 of 2021 Answers to the Issues : 20. In view of my answers to the questions, I find that the findings and conclusions reached by the Trial Court in respect of issue No.1, in the Original Suit, that the defendants 1 and 2 have borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 15.06.1999 and 20.09.1999 respectively, as correct. I also concur with the Trial Court in answering issue No.2, in the Original Suit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 09.11.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 24.11.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135...

[2/8, 18:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Today the members of Young Advocates Association along with their President Vignesh Arunachalam met and Greeted the Honble justice P.B.Balaji…. [2/8, 18:51] sekarreporter1: 🌹

Uncategorized

[2/8, 18:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Today the members of Young Advocates Association along with their President Vignesh Arunachalam met and Greeted the Honble justice P.B.Balaji…. [2/8, 18:51] sekarreporter1: 🌹

[2/8, 18:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Today the members of Young Advocates Association along with their President Vignesh Arunachalam met and Greeted the Honble justice P.B.Balaji…. [2/8, 18:51] sekarreporter1: 🌹

Sc order we are of the view that the issue of territorial jurisdiction cannot be decided in a writ petition, especially when there is a serious factual dispute about the place/places of commission of the offence. Hence, this question should be raised by the petitioner before the Special Court, since an answer to the same would depend upon evidence as to the places where any one or more of the processes or activities mentioned in Section 3 were carried out. Therefore, giving liberty to the petitioner to raise the issue of territorial jurisdiction before the Trial Court, this writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. …………………………….J. (V. Ramasubramanian) …………………………….J. (J.B. Pardiwala) New Delhi February 07, 2023

Uncategorized

Sc order we are of the view that the issue of territorial jurisdiction cannot be decided in a writ petition, especially when there is a serious factual dispute about the place/places of commission of the offence. Hence, this question should be raised by the petitioner before the Special Court, since an answer to the same would depend upon evidence as to the places where any one or more of the processes or activities mentioned in Section 3 were carried out. Therefore, giving liberty to the petitioner to raise the issue of territorial jurisdiction before the Trial Court, this writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. …………………………….J. (V. Ramasubramanian) …………………………….J. (J.B. Pardiwala) New Delhi February 07, 2023

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 12 OF 2023 RANA AYYUB VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT …PETITIONER THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR …RESPONDENT J U D G M...

Vinothpandian: 1975 CRI LJ 1756 : pali Ram vs state : The court can direct any person to write words or figures to enable the court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by such person [2/8, 16:12] Vinothpandian

Uncategorized

Vinothpandian: 1975 CRI LJ 1756 : pali Ram vs state : The court can direct any person to write words or figures to enable the court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by such person [2/8, 16:12] Vinothpandian

[2/8, 16:12] Vinothpandian: 1975 CRI LJ 1756 : pali Ram vs state : The court can direct any person to write words or figures to enable the court to compare the words or figures...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com