SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

justices S M Subramaniam and G Arul Murugan said authorities concerned are bound to follow the above guidelines, and added that quarry operations must be transparent and free of irregularities, especially in

Uncategorized

justices S M Subramaniam and G Arul Murugan said authorities concerned are bound to follow the above guidelines, and added that quarry operations must be transparent and free of irregularities, especially in

‘Strictly follow guidelines on quarrying, sale of sand’: Madurai Bench of Madras HC However, the government counsel told the court that the guidelines are being properly followed by the officials and that they are...

Former CJI P. Sathasivam chairs meeting on improving timely justice delivery in Erode Published – August 24, 2025 08:29 pm IST – Erode The Hindu Bureau A consultation on improving timely justice delivery was chaired by former Chief Justice of India P. Sathasivam, along with Madras High Court Judges C.V. Karthikeyan and C. Kumarappan in Erode on Saturday.

Uncategorized

Former CJI P. Sathasivam chairs meeting on improving timely justice delivery in Erode Published – August 24, 2025 08:29 pm IST – Erode The Hindu Bureau A consultation on improving timely justice delivery was chaired by former Chief Justice of India P. Sathasivam, along with Madras High Court Judges C.V. Karthikeyan and C. Kumarappan in Erode on Saturday.

Former CJI P. Sathasivam chairs meeting on improving timely justice delivery in Erode Published – August 24, 2025 08:29 pm IST – Erode The Hindu Bureau A consultation on improving timely justice delivery was...

Justice Krishnan Ramasamy observed that the petitioner had filed his return on time and disclosed the foreign income, which was duly accepted by the department. The court explained that the only objection was delay in filing Form 67, which could not by itself defeat the substantive claim for FTC.

Uncategorized

Justice Krishnan Ramasamy observed that the petitioner had filed his return on time and disclosed the foreign income, which was duly accepted by the department. The court explained that the only objection was delay in filing Form 67, which could not by itself defeat the substantive claim for FTC.

” Home »Top Stories »Filing Form 67 Before… Filing Form 67 Before Final Income Assessment is Sufficient Compliance: Madras HC Rules Rule 128 Directory, Not Mandatory [Read Order] The Madras High Court ruled that filing...

Therefore, I am not inclined to admit this writ petition. This writ petition is liable to be dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to pay amounts that may be to stave off any immediate proposal for re-auctioning the property and attempt to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 13.08.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No PJL To 1. The Reserve Bank of India, Department of Banking Regulation, 13th Floor, Central Office Building, Mumbai – 400 001. 2. The General Manager, Credit Audit Monetary Department, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Head Office, 1st Floor, No. 57, V.E. Road, Thoothukudi 628 002. 3. The Assistant General Manager, Credit Audit Monetary Department, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Head Office, 1st Floor, No. 57, V.E. Road, Thoothukudi 628 002. 4. The Branch Head, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Thalakkulam Branch, Monday Market, Kaniyakumari – 629 802. 5. Authorised Officer, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Thalakkulam Branch, Monday Market, Kaniyakumari – 629 802.   C.SARAVANAN , J. PJL W .P.(MD)No.22136 of 2025 13.08.2025

Uncategorized

Therefore, I am not inclined to admit this writ petition. This writ petition is liable to be dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to pay amounts that may be to stave off any immediate proposal for re-auctioning the property and attempt to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 13.08.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No PJL To 1. The Reserve Bank of India, Department of Banking Regulation, 13th Floor, Central Office Building, Mumbai – 400 001. 2. The General Manager, Credit Audit Monetary Department, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Head Office, 1st Floor, No. 57, V.E. Road, Thoothukudi 628 002. 3. The Assistant General Manager, Credit Audit Monetary Department, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Head Office, 1st Floor, No. 57, V.E. Road, Thoothukudi 628 002. 4. The Branch Head, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Thalakkulam Branch, Monday Market, Kaniyakumari – 629 802. 5. Authorised Officer, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Thalakkulam Branch, Monday Market, Kaniyakumari – 629 802.   C.SARAVANAN , J. PJL W .P.(MD)No.22136 of 2025 13.08.2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.08.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.(MD)No.22136 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17213 & 17214 of 2025 M/s. Kirubha Exports, Represented by its Proprietrix Mrs.V.T. Kirubha,...

Justice C. Saravanan dismissed the writ petition challenging the bank’s April 2025 order, ruling that the classification was in line with the Reserve Bank of India’s July 2024 circular on fraud prevention, detection, and reporting.

Uncategorized

Justice C. Saravanan dismissed the writ petition challenging the bank’s April 2025 order, ruling that the classification was in line with the Reserve Bank of India’s July 2024 circular on fraud prevention, detection, and reporting.

Sign in Join Sign in Welcome!Log into your account your username your password Forgot your password? Create an account Sign up Welcome!Register for an account your email your username A password will be e-mailed...

Justice Krishnan Ramasamy observed that while technically the petitioner should have filed an appeal within time, the explanation given that the rectification petition was pursued first appeared to be genuine.

Uncategorized

Justice Krishnan Ramasamy observed that while technically the petitioner should have filed an appeal within time, the explanation given that the rectification petition was pursued first appeared to be genuine.

“»Top Stories »Taxpayer Pursued… Taxpayer Pursued Rectification Petition First: Madras HC Condones 108 Days Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order] The Madras High Court condoned a 108-day delay in filing appeal after observing that...

கொடுங்குற்ற வழக்குகளில் சாட்சிகளாக உள்ள குழந்தைகளை உளவியல் ரீதியாக பாதுகாப்பது தொடர்பாக வழிகாட்டி விதிமுறைகளை

Uncategorized

கொடுங்குற்ற வழக்குகளில் சாட்சிகளாக உள்ள குழந்தைகளை உளவியல் ரீதியாக பாதுகாப்பது தொடர்பாக வழிகாட்டி விதிமுறைகளை

கொடுங்குற்ற வழக்குகளில் சாட்சிகளாக உள்ள குழந்தைகளை உளவியல் ரீதியாக பாதுகாப்பது தொடர்பாக வழிகாட்டி விதிமுறைகளை வகுக்க பல்வேறு துறைகள் அடங்கிய குழுவை அமைக்க முடிவு செய்துள்ளதாக, தமிழக அரசு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் தெரிவித்துள்ளது. கோவையில், சகோதரியை, அவரது எட்டு வயது மகளின் கண்ணெதிரே, கண்டந்துண்டமாக வெட்டிக்...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com