SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

Judge Krishnan Ramasamy / 13. Result: For all the reasons stated above, this Court is not inclined to entertain these cases. Therefore, these writ petitions are dismissed as devoid of merits. The interim stay/injunction orders, if any, granted in these writ petitions stand vacated. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 26.02.2026 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index: Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No nsa KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., nsa W.P.No s.29753 & 29755 of 2019 26.02.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 26.11.2025 Pronounced on 26.02.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.Nos.29753 & 29755 of 2019 & W.M.P.Nos .29654, 29885, 29886, 29883 of 2019,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

WHEN DOES ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE BECOME MANDATORY IN NATIONAL HIGHWAY ACQUISITION? MADRAS HC DECODES PV KRISHNAMURTHY ANANT MANDGI V. UNION OF INDIA & NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA | W.P. NOS. 29753 & 29755 OF 2019 | HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASrasras | Justice Krishnan Ramasamy | 26.02.2026

WHEN DOES ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE BECOME MANDATORY IN NATIONAL HIGHWAY ACQUISITION? MADRAS HC DECODES PV KRISHNAMURTHY ANANT MANDGI V. UNION OF INDIA & NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA | W.P. NOS. 29753 & 29755 OF...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

The power of judicial review of the High Court under Article 226 is to ensure the processes through which decision has been taken by the competent authority is in consonance with the provisions of the statutes and rules in force but not the decision. In the present case, the procedures were followed scrupulously by affording opportunity to the parties. Both the District Level Committee as well as Writ Court, factually found that the appellants have not established any right. In view of the above findings, this Court finds no further interference is called for. Consequently, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-03-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAdMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WA No. 1992 of 2023 1. A.C.Murugesan No. 184, Vanniyar...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

This Court is of the view that the conditions of the tender cannot be altered/modified to make it suitable to the petitioner, as the best person to frame the terms and conditions of the tender is the tender making authority, who has the necessary technical and administrative expertise. 17. In view of the aforesaid finding arrived at, we are not delving into the other authorities cited across the bar on either side. For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interim applications stand closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 17.03.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sasi  To: 1. The Election Commission of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.03.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.10973 of 2026 and WMP N os...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

#NewsUpdate | திருப்பரங்குன்றம் தீபம் விவகாரத்தில் நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு வழக்கில் உயர் நீதிமன்ற தனி நீதிபதி ஜி.ஆர்.சுவாமிநாதனின் உத்தரவுக்கு இரு நீதிபதிகள் அமர்வு தடை மலையில் பூஜை செய்ய சிலரை அனுமதிக்க வேண்டும் உள்ளிட்ட சில உத்தரவுகளை தனி நீதிபதி பிறப்பித்திருந்தார். இதற்கு எதிராக இரு நீதிபதிகள் அமர்வில் மேல்முறையீடு செய்யப்பட்டிருந்தது இன்று இவ்வழக்கை விசாரித்த நீதிபதிகள் சதீஷ் குமார், ஜோதிராமன் அமர்வு, தனி நீதிபதியின் உத்தரவுக்கு தடை விதித்து வழக்கின் விசாரணையை வரும் ஏப்ரல் 8ம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தனர் #SunNews | #Thiruparankundram | #MadrasHC

#NewsUpdate | திருப்பரங்குன்றம் தீபம் விவகாரத்தில் நீதிமன்ற அவமதிப்பு வழக்கில் உயர் நீதிமன்ற தனி நீதிபதி ஜி.ஆர்.சுவாமிநாதனின் உத்தரவுக்கு இரு நீதிபதிகள் அமர்வு தடை மலையில் பூஜை செய்ய சிலரை அனுமதிக்க வேண்டும் உள்ளிட்ட சில உத்தரவுகளை தனி நீதிபதி பிறப்பித்திருந்தார். இதற்கு எதிராக இரு நீதிபதிகள்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

Accordingly, the proceedings pending against the petitioners in C.C.No.4 of 2025, on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Udhagamandalam, the Nilgiris, is hereby quashed and as a sequitur, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 09.02.2026 dsn Internet:Yes/No  A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J. dsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.02.2026 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.2970 of 2026 and Crl.MP.Nos.2042 and 2043 of 2026 1. Mohammed Rafiq 2. K.Abdul Samad 3. Abuthagir...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version