SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL APPEAL SUIT NO.279 OF 2017 AND CMP NO.10521 OF 2017 K.Ganesan … Appellant / Plaintiff Vs. Ms.S.Selvi … Respondent / Defendant PRAYER: First Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.221/2014 dated March 28, 2017 on the file of the Second Additional District Judge, Erode.

2025:MHC:2463 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS JUDGMENT RESERVED ON : 29 / 07 / 2025 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON : 29 / 10 / 2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL...

Uncategorized

Justice R. Sakthivel, hearing an appeal (A.S.No.279 of 2017), upheld a Trial Court’s decision to deny specific performance of the sale agreement. However, the High Court (Madras HC) modified the final decree, granting the plaintiff’s alternative prayer for a refund of Rs. 10,00,000/-, concluding that the agreement was intended as security for this loan amount.

VIP MEMBER LOGIN HomeJudgements JUDGEMENTS Oral Evidence Admissible to Prove Registered Sale Agreement was ‘Security’ for Loan; Sections 91 & 92 Evidence Act Not a Bar: Madras HC By Law Trend November 3, 2025...

Uncategorized

MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM (v) AND (vi) THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ (vii) (viii) W.A.Nos.2716, 2718, 2726, 2727, 2728 and 2682 of 2025 (ix) and (x) C.M.P.Nos.21841, 21855, 21892, 21903, 21907 and 21546 of 2025 (xi) (xii) (xiii) 1.The Commissioner of Land Administration

(i) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (ii) DATED: 29.10.2025 (iii) CORAM: (iv) THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM (v) AND (vi) THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ (vii) (viii) W.A.Nos.2716, 2718, 2726, 2727, 2728...

Uncategorized

SupremeCourt refuses to hear petition seeking ban on use of social media for children in the age group of 14-18 years

[03/11, 12:17] Sekarreporter: 14 முதல் 18 வயது சிறார்கள் சமூக வலைதளங்களை பயன்படுத்த முழு தடை கோரிய மனு தள்ளுபடி..! [03/11, 12:17] Sekarreporter: Sc order [03/11, 12:20] Sekarreporter: #SupremeCourt refuses to hear petition seeking ban on use of...

Vinothpandian: Supreme Court : civil appeal no 2483 of 2014 dated 9th Oct 2025. ( canara bank vs KL Rajgarhia : Agreement to sell for construction of flats found to be unenforceable due to violation of building laws and regulations , doctrine of severability does not permit courts to alter essential terms or object of the contract ( contract act 1872 section 23 )

Uncategorized

Vinothpandian: Supreme Court : civil appeal no 2483 of 2014 dated 9th Oct 2025. ( canara bank vs KL Rajgarhia : Agreement to sell for construction of flats found to be unenforceable due to violation of building laws and regulations , doctrine of severability does not permit courts to alter essential terms or object of the contract ( contract act 1872 section 23 )

[03/11, 11:52] Vinothpandian: Supreme Court : civil appeal no 2483 of 2014 dated 9th Oct 2025. ( canara bank vs KL Rajgarhia : Agreement to sell for construction of flats found to be unenforceable...

@ECISVEEP says there r two kinds of revisions… One is summary revision which happens annually and before every election… Another category is special intensive revision which is done from the scrap, it last happened in 2005.

Uncategorized

@ECISVEEP says there r two kinds of revisions… One is summary revision which happens annually and before every election… Another category is special intensive revision which is done from the scrap, it last happened in 2005.

@ECISVEEP says there r two kinds of revisions… One is summary revision which happens annually and before every election… Another category is special intensive revision which is done from the scrap, it last happened...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com