SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( crl ) 15688 of 2025 dated 10th nov 2025 : suspension of sentence in cases involving life imprisonment must be exercised with caution and in adherence to well- settled legal principles , requiring the appellate

Uncategorized

Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( crl ) 15688 of 2025 dated 10th nov 2025 : suspension of sentence in cases involving life imprisonment must be exercised with caution and in adherence to well- settled legal principles , requiring the appellate

[12/11, 10:46] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( crl ) 15688 of 2025 dated 10th nov 2025 : suspension of sentence in cases involving life imprisonment must be exercised with caution and in adherence...

Supreme Court is to hear the customs appeal against Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), as the Madras High Court held that the circular imposing a time bar on shipping bill conversion was ultra vires.” https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/madras-hc-invalidates-circulars-time-bar-on-shipping-bill-conversion-sc-to-hear-appeal-against-indian-oil-

Uncategorized

Supreme Court is to hear the customs appeal against Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), as the Madras High Court held that the circular imposing a time bar on shipping bill conversion was ultra vires.” https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/madras-hc-invalidates-circulars-time-bar-on-shipping-bill-conversion-sc-to-hear-appeal-against-indian-oil-

[12/11, 10:09] Sekarreporter: “Supreme Court is to hear the customs appeal against Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), as the Madras High Court held that the circular imposing a time bar on shipping bill conversion...

Supreme Court on Monday (November 10) delivered a significant ruling interpreting the Specific Relief Act, 1963, holding that a party cannot unilaterally terminate a non-determinable agreement to sell, except where the contract itself is expressly

Uncategorized

Supreme Court on Monday (November 10) delivered a significant ruling interpreting the Specific Relief Act, 1963, holding that a party cannot unilaterally terminate a non-determinable agreement to sell, except where the contract itself is expressly

The Supreme Court on Monday (November 10) delivered a significant ruling interpreting the Specific Relief Act, 1963, holding that a party cannot unilaterally terminate a non-determinable agreement to sell, except where the contract itself...

division bench of justice Anita Sumanth and justice C Kumarappan observed that since the petitioner made a representation before the competent authorities putting forth the same plea, it would be more appropriate for them to consider the same and take note of all the suggestions. Needless to say, it falls within the domain of the policy of the state to act on the suggestions.”

Uncategorized

division bench of justice Anita Sumanth and justice C Kumarappan observed that since the petitioner made a representation before the competent authorities putting forth the same plea, it would be more appropriate for them to consider the same and take note of all the suggestions. Needless to say, it falls within the domain of the policy of the state to act on the suggestions.”

“division bench of justice Anita Sumanth and justice C Kumarappan observed that since the petitioner made a representation before the competent authorities putting forth the same plea, it would be more appropriate for them...

justice A D Jagadish Chandira and justice R Poornima observed, “It is befitting to point out that any riot or act of violence committed in the name of a leader, without due regard to his true vision or ideology, cannot be justified and shall amount to an insult to the leader’s honour and the very principles he stood for.””

Uncategorized

justice A D Jagadish Chandira and justice R Poornima observed, “It is befitting to point out that any riot or act of violence committed in the name of a leader, without due regard to his true vision or ideology, cannot be justified and shall amount to an insult to the leader’s honour and the very principles he stood for.””

“justice A D Jagadish Chandira and justice R Poornima observed, “It is befitting to point out that any riot or act of violence committed in the name of a leader, without due regard to...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com