SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

உச்சநீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு ஒன்றின் போது வழக்கறிஞர் பிரபல ஷோலே திரைப்படத்தில் இருந்து வசனம் ஒன்றை உதாரணத்திற்காக பேசி வாதிட்டார் அமர்வில் இருந்த நீதிபதி ராமசுப்பிரமணியன் சிரித்துக்கொண்டே நான் ஷோலே, பார்த்திருக்கிறேன் ஆனால் SubTitle இல்லாததால் வசனம் எதுவும் புரியவில்லை என்றார் 😉

Uncategorized

உச்சநீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு ஒன்றின் போது வழக்கறிஞர் பிரபல ஷோலே திரைப்படத்தில் இருந்து வசனம் ஒன்றை உதாரணத்திற்காக பேசி வாதிட்டார் அமர்வில் இருந்த நீதிபதி ராமசுப்பிரமணியன் சிரித்துக்கொண்டே நான் ஷோலே, பார்த்திருக்கிறேன் ஆனால் SubTitle இல்லாததால் வசனம் எதுவும் புரியவில்லை என்றார் 😉

உச்சநீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு ஒன்றின் போது வழக்கறிஞர் பிரபல ஷோலே திரைப்படத்தில் இருந்து வசனம் ஒன்றை உதாரணத்திற்காக பேசி வாதிட்டார் அமர்வில் இருந்த நீதிபதி ராமசுப்பிரமணியன் சிரித்துக்கொண்டே நான் ஷோலே, பார்த்திருக்கிறேன் ஆனால் SubTitle இல்லாததால் வசனம் எதுவும் புரியவில்லை என்றார் 😉

M/s. Paulsons Beauty and Fashion Pvt Ltd, Filed a case seeking to stop using the trade name Doni & Guys. Their contention is that they are running saloons under the name Toni & Guy in chennai banglore,Hyderabad, Calcutta, kerala and orisa. Vijayan Subramanian @lawyervijayan appeared for the Toni & Guy brand. Justice C.Saravanan granted injunction from using the Doni & Guy.

Uncategorized

M/s. Paulsons Beauty and Fashion Pvt Ltd, Filed a case seeking to stop using the trade name Doni & Guys. Their contention is that they are running saloons under the name Toni & Guy in chennai banglore,Hyderabad, Calcutta, kerala and orisa. Vijayan Subramanian @lawyervijayan appeared for the Toni & Guy brand. Justice C.Saravanan granted injunction from using the Doni & Guy.

M/s. Paulsons Beauty and Fashion Pvt Ltd, Filed a case seeking to stop using the trade name Doni & Guys. Their contention is that they are running saloons under the name Toni & Guy...

[3/3, 15:30] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/SpxOjiamiGI [3/3, 15:31] sekarreporter1: Rss adv rabu manohar in sc

Uncategorized

[3/3, 15:30] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/SpxOjiamiGI [3/3, 15:31] sekarreporter1: Rss adv rabu manohar in sc

ஆர்.எஸ்.எஸ் அமைப்பினர் பேரணிக்கு எதிராக தமிழ்நாடு அரசு தொடந்த மேல்முறையீட்டு மனு விசாரணை உச்சநீதிமன்றத்தில் தொடங்கியது உளவு துறை தகவல் அடிப்படையில் ஒரு நிகழ்ச்சிக்கு அனுமதி வழங்குவது மறுப்பது அரசின் உரிமை சார்ந்த விஷயம் இதில் நீதிமன்றம் தலையிட முடியாது: தமிழ்நாடு அரசு வாதம் கோவை வெடிகுண்டு...

A Single Judge while hearing a collateral proceedings cannot override a judgment of a Division Bench between the same parties and such order will be without jurisdiction and Corum non judice. Therefore the findings and directions contrary to the Division Bench must be disregarded. The above directions were issued while hearing a contempt proceedings for non compliance of the Order made by the Division Bench in HCP for sending the minor twin boys who are US citizen to United States wherein the Court noticed that the single judge in a connected CRP proceedings held that Division Bench Order is not valid and granted the interim custody to the mother. G Rajagopalan senior counsel for Sunita Kumari for petitioner

Uncategorized

A Single Judge while hearing a collateral proceedings cannot override a judgment of a Division Bench between the same parties and such order will be without jurisdiction and Corum non judice. Therefore the findings and directions contrary to the Division Bench must be disregarded. The above directions were issued while hearing a contempt proceedings for non compliance of the Order made by the Division Bench in HCP for sending the minor twin boys who are US citizen to United States wherein the Court noticed that the single judge in a connected CRP proceedings held that Division Bench Order is not valid and granted the interim custody to the mother. G Rajagopalan senior counsel for Sunita Kumari for petitioner

A Single Judge while hearing a collateral proceedings cannot override a judgment of a Division Bench between the same parties and such order will be without jurisdiction and Corum non judice. Therefore the findings...

A Single Judge while hearing a collateral proceedings cannot override a judgment of a Division Bench between the same parties and such order will be without jurisdiction and Corum non judice. Therefore the findings and directions contrary to the Division Bench must be disregarded. The above directions were issued while hearing a contempt proceedings for non compliance of the Order made by the Division Bench in HCP for sending the minor twin boys who are US citizen to United States wherein the Court noticed that the single judge in a connected CRP proceedings held that Division Bench Order is not valid and granted the interim custody to the mother.

Uncategorized

A Single Judge while hearing a collateral proceedings cannot override a judgment of a Division Bench between the same parties and such order will be without jurisdiction and Corum non judice. Therefore the findings and directions contrary to the Division Bench must be disregarded. The above directions were issued while hearing a contempt proceedings for non compliance of the Order made by the Division Bench in HCP for sending the minor twin boys who are US citizen to United States wherein the Court noticed that the single judge in a connected CRP proceedings held that Division Bench Order is not valid and granted the interim custody to the mother.

A Single Judge while hearing a collateral proceedings cannot override a judgment of a Division Bench between the same parties and such order will be without jurisdiction and Corum non judice. Therefore the findings...

W.A.No.2388 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.18244 of 2022 PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) 1. Challenge in this appeal is made to the order dated 09.09.2022 recorded on W.P.No.17798 of 2022. This appeal is by

Uncategorized

W.A.No.2388 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.18244 of 2022 PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) 1. Challenge in this appeal is made to the order dated 09.09.2022 recorded on W.P.No.17798 of 2022. This appeal is by

W.A.No.2388 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.18244 of 2022 PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) 1. Challenge in this appeal is made to the order...

SUB-APPLN.No.104 of 2023 in Cont.P.No.372 of 2023 S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND N.ANAND VENKATESH,J. (Order of the Court was made by N.Anand Venkatesh,J) The Contempt Petition has been filed against the respondent for non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court in Paragraph No.16 of the order passed in H.C.P.No.1689 of 2022, dated 03.01.2023.

Uncategorized

SUB-APPLN.No.104 of 2023 in Cont.P.No.372 of 2023 S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND N.ANAND VENKATESH,J. (Order of the Court was made by N.Anand Venkatesh,J) The Contempt Petition has been filed against the respondent for non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court in Paragraph No.16 of the order passed in H.C.P.No.1689 of 2022, dated 03.01.2023.

[pdf-embedder url=”https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Shiva_Shankar_Baba_v_State__1_.pdf”]SUB-APPLN.No.104 of 2023 in Cont.P.No.372 of 2023 S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND N.ANAND VENKATESH,J. (Order of the Court was made by N.Anand Venkatesh,J) The Contempt Petition has been filed against the respondent for non-compliance of the...

Deva Makkal Kural: Court deva (இறையரசு) அதிமுக பொதுக்குழு தீர்மானங்களுக்கு தடை விதிக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் மறுப்பு

Uncategorized

Deva Makkal Kural: Court deva (இறையரசு) அதிமுக பொதுக்குழு தீர்மானங்களுக்கு தடை விதிக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் மறுப்பு

[3/3, 13:01] Deva Makkal Kural: Court deva (இறையரசு) அதிமுக பொதுக்குழு தீர்மானங்களுக்கு தடை விதிக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் மறுப்பு எதிர்தரப்பினர் விளக்கம் கேட்காமல் இடைக்கால உத்தரவு பிறப்பிக்க முடியாது – உயர்நீதிமன்றம் அதிமுக பொதுக்குழு தீர்மானங்களை எதிர்த்த வழக்கில் அதிமுக இடைக்கால பொதுச்செயலாளர்...

Call Now ButtonCALL ME