SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Madras High Court on Wednesday (January 07) directed the Tamil Nadu Home Secretary to constitute district-level monitoring committees to ensure that the orderly system is completely abolished in the state. The bench of Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice C Kumarappan directed the committee to be formulated within 2 weeks.

The Madras High Court on Wednesday (January 07) directed the Tamil Nadu Home Secretary to constitute district-level monitoring committees to ensure that the orderly system is completely abolished in the state. The bench of...

The reason why #JanaNayagan producers have postponed the release without mentioning a date is because the single judge’s verdict is not the be-all & end-all. It can be taken on appeal before a Division Bench (comprising two judges) of the High Court and then to the Supreme Court.

The reason why #JanaNayagan producers have postponed the release without mentioning a date is because the single judge’s verdict is not the be-all & end-all. It can be taken on appeal before a Division...

In view of the order passed by us earlier that if any encroacher is aggrieved by any order passed under Section 6 of the Act of 1905, he/she is at liberty to make an application before this Court, it is made clear that no other authority shall have jurisdiction to entertain the application in the matter of challenge to the order under Section 6 of the Act, except with the leave of the court. List the matter on 21.1.2026 for reporting compliance. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 06.01.2026 sasi ___________

[08/01, 07:43] Sekarreporter: [08/01, 01:17] B. JAGANNATH Advt: Item 30 before the Learned First Division Bench on 06.01.2026. WP 14027 of 2024- Public Interest Litigation to remove encroachment at Chidambaram Kamaraj Government Hospital (GH)...

Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava , “One can have opinions about the judgement. But can’t call the presiding officer names”.

[07/01, 20:34] Sekarreporter: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-book-personal-attack-justice-gr-swaminathan-517200 [07/01, 20:39] Sekarreporter: While hearing an urgent petition challenging the publication of a book allegedly making personal attacks against Justice GR Swaminathan, the Madras High Court on Wednesday (January 7)...

Madampaty case order

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON PRONOUNCED ON 10.11.2025 07.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR O.A. No.948 of 2025 & A. No.4798 of 2025 in C.S. (Comm. Div.) No.250 of 2025...

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON PRONOUNCED ON 10.11.2025 07.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR O.A. No.948 of 2025 & A. No.4798 of 2025 in C.S. (Comm. Div.) No.250 of 2025 Vs. .. Applicant .. Respondents Prayer in O.A. No.948 of 2025 & A. No.4798 of 2025: Application filed for an order of interim injunction restraining the 1st respondent/1st defendant, her men, agents, representatives or any persons claiming under or through her, from in any manner making, writing, uploading, printing, publishing, broadcasting, distributing, posting, circulating, or disseminating in any form of media, whether print, electronic, digital, internet, social media platforms or otherwise, any false, malicious or defamatory material, statements, videos, reels, captions, photographs, audio-visual content of communications disparaging the applicant’s/plaintiff’s personality rights, which directly or indirectly defame his character, personal life, professional standing or reputation in the hospitality industry, entertainment sector or the public domain, thereby causing him irreparable commercial loss and goodwill and reputation. _____________ Page 1/45 ( Uploaded on: 07/01/2026 06:29:19 pm )

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON PRONOUNCED ON 10.11.2025 07.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR O.A. No.948 of 2025 & A. No.4798 of 2025 in C.S. (Comm. Div.) No.250 of 2025 Vs. .. Applicant .. Respondents Prayer in O.A. No.948 of 2025 & A. No.4798 of 2025: Application filed for an order of interim injunction restraining the 1st respondent/1st defendant, her men, agents, representatives or any persons claiming under or through her, from in any manner making, writing, uploading, printing, publishing, broadcasting, distributing, posting, circulating, or disseminating in any form of media, whether print, electronic, digital, internet, social media platforms or otherwise, any false, malicious or defamatory material, statements, videos, reels, captions, photographs, audio-visual content of communications disparaging the applicant’s/plaintiff’s personality rights, which directly or indirectly defame his character, personal life, professional standing or reputation in the hospitality industry, entertainment sector or the public domain, thereby causing him irreparable commercial loss and goodwill and reputation. _____________ Page 1/45 ( Uploaded on: 07/01/2026 06:29:19 pm )

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON PRONOUNCED ON 10.11.2025 07.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR O.A. No.948 of 2025 & A. No.4798 of 2025 in C.S. (Comm. Div.) No.250 of 2025...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com