SEKAR REPORTER Blog

#ஜனநாயகன் பட வழக்கு தலைமை நீதிபதி அமர்வில் நாளை 16வது வழக்காக விசாரணைக்கு பட்டியலிடபட்டுள்ளது.

#ஜனநாயகன் பட வழக்கு தலைமை நீதிபதி அமர்வில் நாளை 16வது வழக்காக விசாரணைக்கு பட்டியலிடபட்டுள்ளது.

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

“You cannot blackmail the Bench too,” Justice P Velmurugan of #MadrasHighCourt tells Savukku Shankar while refusing to recuse from hearing a plea to cancel his bail though the YouTuber had accused the judge of bias. “I’ve never recused from hearing any case in my judicial career spanning over 20 years (including 11 years as a district judge & nine years as a High Court judge) and will not recuse from this case too,” the senior judge says. @THChennai

“You cannot blackmail the Bench too,” Justice P Velmurugan of #MadrasHighCourt tells Savukku Shankar while refusing to recuse from hearing a plea to cancel his bail though the YouTuber had accused the judge of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
“. The victim either is entitled to recognise as wife. Or the accused may be charged with promise to marry. But the accused now refuse to marry. Hence left with no option the accused / petitioner is liable to be prosecuted under section 69 of BNS.  22.           Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the offence, the specific overt act against the petitioner, and also since the allegation against the petitioner is promise to marry and there are prima facie evidence available, hence interrogation is necessary, hence this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this stage.  23.           Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.”  https://www.sekarreporter.com/ab-order-the-honble-mrs-justice-s-srimathy-crl-opmd-no-6147-of-2025-prabhakaran-petitioner-vs/#:~:text=.%20The%20victim%20either,Petition%20is%20dismissed.

“. The victim either is entitled to recognise as wife. Or the accused may be charged with promise to marry. But the accused now refuse to marry. Hence left with no option the accused / petitioner is liable to be prosecuted under section 69 of BNS. 22.           Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the offence, the specific overt act against the petitioner, and also since the allegation against the petitioner is promise to marry and there are prima facie evidence available, hence interrogation is necessary, hence this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this stage. 23.           Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.” https://www.sekarreporter.com/ab-order-the-honble-mrs-justice-s-srimathy-crl-opmd-no-6147-of-2025-prabhakaran-petitioner-vs/#:~:text=.%20The%20victim%20either,Petition%20is%20dismissed.

“. The victim either is entitled to recognise as wife. Or the accused may be charged with promise to marry. But the accused now refuse to marry. Hence left with no option the accused...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

[19/01, 18:15] G Rajesh Mha பொருளாளர்: MHAA s Election committee convened meeting with the outgoing office bearers of MHAA to discuss about conducting election to MHAA. Mr Justice V Bharathidasan , Retd Judge of MHC, Chairman of the committee and Dr Chelliah , Sr Advocate , Vice Chairman, with other committee members Sr Adv Mr P M Subramaniam and Mr Ashok Menon, Adv decided to fix the election by April 2026. The last date for payment of subscription/ arrears is fixed by 06.02.26. Regards G. RAJESH, Ex Treasurer- MHAA. [19/01, 18:15] Sekarreporter: 👍

[19/01, 18:15] G Rajesh Mha பொருளாளர்: MHAA s Election committee convened meeting with the outgoing office bearers of MHAA to discuss about conducting election to MHAA. Mr Justice V Bharathidasan , Retd Judge of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

The Madras High Court has directed the Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) to conduct surprise checks in Metro trains to ensure priority seating for senior citizens and persons with disabilities (PwDs). The court also instructed CMRL to take immediate action if it receives complaints about denial of priority seating. Currently, CMRL has reserved 14 seats in each train compartment for senior citizens

[19/01, 18:05] Sekarreporter: [19/01, 18:04] Sekarreporter: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/madras-hc-directs-cmrl-to-conduct-surprise-checks-in-metro-trains-to-ensure-priority-seating-for-senior-citizens-pwds/article70524455.ece [19/01, 18:04] Sekarreporter: English [19/01, 18:05] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has directed the Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) to conduct surprise checks in Metro trains...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version