SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Kalaimagal saba case order Anitha sumanth bench 4 weeks time for govt official to fic boundry of property of kalaimagal saba both side advts former sgp vijai and aag ravinthiren and singaravelan kamalnathan chinnadurai

Kalaimagal saba case order Anitha sumanth bench 4 weeks time for govt official to fic boundry of property of kalaimagal saba   Kalaimagal saba case order Anitha sumanth bench 4 weeks time for govt...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

The Supreme Court has disposed of the NIA’s petition seeking cancellation of bail in the SI shooting case, allowing the High Court’s order to stand.

[30/01, 11:48] Sekarreporter: [30/01, 11:48] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/i/status/2017120082883989862 [30/01, 11:48] Sekarreporter: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Dispose the NIA SLP SEEKING CANCELLATION OF BAIL IN SI SHOOTING CASE The Hon’ble Supreme Court refused to interfere with...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

No stay NAVj order mhc chief bench both side Ag and senior Ragavachery heated arguments

[30/01, 11:42] Sekarreporter: தாம்பரம் காவல் ஆணையர் அலுவலகத்தை 2 ஆண்டுகளில் காலி செய்ய சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் தடை விதிக்க மறுத்து விட்டது் காவல் ஆணையர் அலுவலக கட்டிட வாடகையை ரூ.6 லட்சத்திலிருந்து இருந்து ரூ.13 லட்சமாக அதிகரித்து ஐகோர்ட் உத்தரவிட்டது. இந்த வழக்கில் கூடுதல்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Supreme Court A Bench of Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice R. Mahadevan, while allowing the appeals, observed: “The ‘Court’ under Section 29A shall be the Civil Court of ordinary original jurisdiction in a district and includes the High Court in exercise of its original civil jurisdiction

The Supreme Court held that the ‘Court’ under Section 29A for extension of time of an arbitral tribunal is the Civil Court of ordinary original jurisdiction in a district, including a High Court exercising...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that a Tax Recovery Officer lacks the authority to declare a mortgage void ab initio. The court emphasized that the officer’s role is limited to enforcing attachment under the Income Tax Act and cannot decide the validity of a mortgage created in favor of a third party.

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that a Tax Recovery Officer lacks the authority to declare a mortgage void ab initio. The court emphasized that the officer’s role is limited to enforcing attachment under the Income Tax Act and cannot decide the validity of a mortgage created in favor of a third party.

[30/01, 10:51] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that a Tax Recovery Officer lacks the authority to declare a mortgage void ab initio. The court emphasized that the officer’s role is limited...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version