திருநீர்மலை கோயில் தெப்பக்குளத்தை சீரமைக்க எடுக்கப்பட்ட நடவடிக்கை என்ன..? #ஐகோர்ட் chief bench கேள்வி 2 weeks time
திருநீர்மலை கோயில் தெப்பக்குளத்தை சீரமைக்க எடுக்கப்பட்ட நடவடிக்கை என்ன..? #ஐகோர்ட் கேள்வி 2 weeks time
SEKAR REPORTER Blog
Madras High Court has directed the Election Commission of India to respond to a plea filed by Pattali Makkal Katchi founder Dr. S Ramadoss, alleging that the ECI’s communication regarding allotment of “Mango “ symbol to the party was wrongly communicated to the party’s former President Anbumani, who was no longer in the party.
The Madras High Court has directed the Election Commission of India to respond to a plea filed by Pattali Makkal Katchi founder Dr. S Ramadoss, alleging that the ECI’s communication regarding allotment of “Mango...
Grsj. Issue dgp advt gs Mani case after noon hearing morning not reached sc
Grsj dgp advt gs Mani case after noon hearing morning not reached sc
#WritJurisdiction for legal fraternity: 1. Writs include Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, Quo Warranto 2. Supreme Court (Article 32) for enforcing fundamental rights. 3. High Courts (Article 226) for enforcing any legal right. 4. Issued against govt agencies. Private parties can be addl respondents. 5. Generally, alternate remedy must be exhausted including representation. 6. PILs are also writs. 7. Writs also lie against DRAT/NCDRC final orders.
#WritJurisdiction for legal fraternity: 1. Writs include Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, Quo Warranto 2. Supreme Court (Article 32) for enforcing fundamental rights. 3. High Courts (Article 226) for enforcing any legal right. 4....
Section 5 of THE INTER-STATE RIVER WATER DISPUTES ACT, 1956. *Adjudication of water disputes*—(1) When a Tribunal has been constituted under section 4, the Central Government shall, subject to the prohibition contained in section 8, refer the water disputes and any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to, the water dispute to the Tribunal for adjudication.
Section 5 of THE INTER-STATE RIVER WATER DISPUTES ACT, 1956. *Adjudication of water disputes*—(1) When a Tribunal has been constituted under section 4, the Central Government shall, subject to the prohibition contained in section...
Today, in the suit filed by the Tamil Nadu Government seeking the constitution of a river water tribunal to resolve the interstate water dispute related to the Penniyar and Markandeya nadhi projects undertaken by the Karnataka Government, the Hon’ble Supreme Court directed the central government to constitute a tribunal to resolve the dispute and refer the complaint filed by the state of Tamil Nadu as per section 5 of 1956 act. For the TN Government V. Krishnamoorthy, and P. Wilson Senior Advocates
Today, in the suit filed by the Tamil Nadu Government seeking the constitution of a river water tribunal to resolve the interstate water dispute related to the Penniyar and Markandeya nadhi projects undertaken by...
I represent Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) legally. The group behind my father is a breakaway faction, party founder S. Ramadoss’ son Anbumani Ramadoss tells #MadrasHighCourt Says, the writ petition filed in the name of PMK, represented by its founder, is not maintainable at all and alleges that his father is trying to snatch an order from the court behind his back. However, Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan refuse to hear the submissions made on behalf of Dr. Anbumani since he is not one of the respondents in a writ petition filed by his father against the ECI alone regarding allotment of ‘mango’ symbol to the party. Judges ask the counsel, representing Dr. Anbumani, to file an appropriate application to get impleaded in the case before he could be heard. @THChennai
I represent Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) legally. The group behind my father is a breakaway faction, party founder S. Ramadoss’ son Anbumani Ramadoss tells #MadrasHighCourt Says, the writ petition filed in the name of...