SEKAR REPORTER Blog

The Madras High Court’s Full Bench has ruled that there’s a clear difference between ‘resignation’ and ‘voluntary retirement’, following a Supreme Court judgment. Resignation can’t be treated as voluntary retirement, and a previous judgment (D.Vijayarangan Vs. Secretary Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal and Others) is now considered incorrect. Instead, the views in A.I.Angel Illangovan Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu are upheld. 😊

[06/02, 12:22] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has emphasized the distinction between resignation and voluntary retirement, citing a Supreme Court judgment. The key difference lies in the implications of each action: resignation typically...

Mhc Full bench/ There is a valid distinction between ‘resignation’ and ‘voluntary retirement’ as held by the Three Judge Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court inSenior Divisional Manager LIC and Ors vs Shree Lal Meena[10]. Therefore, resignation from service cannot be treated as voluntary retirement. The principle settled in D.Vijayarangan Vs. Secretary Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal and Others (supra) is held to be bad in law. Therefore, the views of the division Bench of this Court in A.I.Angel Illangovan Vs.   The Government of Tamil Nadu (supra), is hereby upheld.

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-02-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY THE HON’BLE  MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 39583 of 2015 AND...

BIG BREAKING 🚨 Supreme Court will hear a PIL in March 2026 on “irrational freebies” promised by political parties during elections to win power. CJI SURYAKANT : “This is an issue of paramount importance and serious public interest” 🔥 Petitioner Ashwini Upadhyay : “Only the sun and moon are left to be promised”

BIG BREAKING 🚨 Supreme Court will hear a PIL in March 2026 on “irrational freebies” promised by political parties during elections to win power. CJI SURYAKANT : “This is an issue of paramount importance...

Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt dismisses a writ petition filed by actor and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam #TVK leader Vijay in 2022 challenging the imposition of a penalty of ₹1.5 crore by

BREAKING: Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt dismisses a writ petition filed by actor and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam #TVK leader Vijay in 2022 challenging the imposition of a penalty of ₹1.5 crore by the Income...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com