SEKAR REPORTER Blog

The Division Bench opined that the directions issued by the single-Judge, prima facie, went beyond the scope of the case at hand. Madras High Court Division Bench stays single-Judge order for constitution of Tax Committees

The Division Bench opined that the directions issued by the single-Judge, prima facie, went beyond the scope of the case at hand. Madras High Court Division Bench stays single-Judge order for constitution of Tax Committees

The Division Bench opined that the directions issued by the single-Judge, prima facie, went beyond the scope of the case at hand. Madras High Court Division Bench stays single-Judge order for constitution of Tax...

Madras high court sept 9 th today news

Madras high court sept 9 th today news

W.P.Nos.10666 of 2019 etc. W.P.Nos.10666 of 2019 and 2127 of 2021 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice) The matter had been adjourned for...

W.A.No.2284 of 2021 W.A.No.2284 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.14503 of 2021 T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.K.Doraisamy, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant. 2.The issue involved in the writ petition filed by the appellant was whether retrospective revision of

W.A.No.2284 of 2021 W.A.No.2284 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.14503 of 2021 T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.K.Doraisamy, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant. 2.The issue involved in the writ petition filed by the appellant was whether retrospective revision of

[9/8, 17:22] Sekarreporter: W.A.No.2284 of 2021 W.A.No.2284 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.14503 of 2021 T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.K.Doraisamy, learned...

S.Mahaveer Shivaji MHC Advocate : Part III. Fundamental Rights Art 13:…..There are certain political  theory exist to the Part III.  Theory of Eclipse,  Theory of Repugnancy, etc  these doctrines are making the

S.Mahaveer Shivaji MHC Advocate : Part III. Fundamental Rights Art 13:…..There are certain political theory exist to the Part III. Theory of Eclipse, Theory of Repugnancy, etc these doctrines are making the

S.Mahaveer Shivaji MHC Advocate : Part III. Fundamental Rights Art 13:…..There are certain political theory exist to the Part III. Theory of Eclipse, Theory of Repugnancy, etc these doctrines are making the fundamental rights...

Justice R.Suresh Kumar held that as the petitioner educational institution i.e. the university cannot be assessed for demanding any service tax for the services of education provided by them, which includes affiliation or other services provided for the students, faculty as well as the staff of the university.

Justice R.Suresh Kumar held that as the petitioner educational institution i.e. the university cannot be assessed for demanding any service tax for the services of education provided by them, which includes affiliation or other services provided for the students, faculty as well as the staff of the university.

​​University can’t be assessed for demanding any Service Tax for providing Education Services including Affiliation: Madras high court The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court held that the ​​university cannot be assessed for demanding...

W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017 etc. W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017 and 31345 of 2014 and W.P. (MD) No.24243 of 2019 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice) Pursuant to the previous orders, the petitioner in

W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017 etc. W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017 and 31345 of 2014 and W.P. (MD) No.24243 of 2019 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice) Pursuant to the previous orders, the petitioner in

W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017 etc. W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017 and 31345 of 2014 and W.P. (MD) No.24243 of 2019 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)...

Cj bench order mhc

Cj bench order mhc

W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017 etc. 3. So as not to compromise public interest, the State should endeavour to obtain appropriate machines or improve the sewer lines to ensure that no manual scavenging is necessary anywhere...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com