SEKAR REPORTER Blog

STATE OF JHARKHAND — Respondent  Criminal Appeal No. 1492 of 2021 and Criminal Appeal No. 1202-1203 of 2014 Decided on : 31-01-2022  Evidence – Burden of Proof to establish plea of alibi – When the trial court as well as the High Court have disbelieved the plea of alibi which

STATE OF JHARKHAND — Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 1492 of 2021 and Criminal Appeal No. 1202-1203 of 2014 Decided on : 31-01-2022 Evidence – Burden of Proof to establish plea of alibi – When the trial court as well as the High Court have disbelieved the plea of alibi which

  GOOD DAY   SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH (Before: Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh, JJ.) PAPPU TIWARY — Appellant  Vs.  STATE OF JHARKHAND — Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 1492 of 2021...

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE     In a Public Interest Litigation, The First Bench comprising of the Chief Justice and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy holds that prior notice to the power agent is not required for revocation of general power of attorney.  Special Government Pleader Yogesh Kannadasan appeared for the Government.  WP No 2992/2022 AT MADRAS DATED:    18.02.2022  CORAM :  THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE  AND  THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY  W.P.No.2992 of 2022  P.Sunil alias Sunil Prakash        —           

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE In a Public Interest Litigation, The First Bench comprising of the Chief Justice and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy holds that prior notice to the power agent is not required for revocation of general power of attorney. Special Government Pleader Yogesh Kannadasan appeared for the Government. WP No 2992/2022 AT MADRAS DATED:    18.02.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.2992 of 2022 P.Sunil alias Sunil Prakash        —           

நான் [2/21, 20:40 [2/21, 20:30] ஜே ஒரு பொது நல வழக்கில், தலைமை நீதிபதி மற்றும் நீதிபதி டி பாரத சக்கரவர்த்தி அடங்கிய முதல் பெஞ்ச், பொது வழக்கறிஞரின் அதிகாரத்தை திரும்பப் பெறுவதற்கு பவர் ஏஜெண்டிற்கு முன் நோட்டீஸ் அனுப்பத் தேவையில்லை என்று கூறுகிறது. அரசு...

It is shame and very deplorable that being the law enforcers and protectors of the people, the police, instead of taking stringent action against the anti-social elements who indulge in illegal activities and create law and order problem, even, if necessary, by arresting them in order to protect the interest of the petitioner, unfortunately, insisting the petitioner to close his eatery shop by 10.30 p.m. ….    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY     W.P.No.10512 of 2018  and  W.M.P.Nos.12478 & 12479 of 2018

It is shame and very deplorable that being the law enforcers and protectors of the people, the police, instead of taking stringent action against the anti-social elements who indulge in illegal activities and create law and order problem, even, if necessary, by arresting them in order to protect the interest of the petitioner, unfortunately, insisting the petitioner to close his eatery shop by 10.30 p.m. …. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY   W.P.No.10512 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.12478 & 12479 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.02.2022 CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY   W.P.No.10512 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.12478 & 12479 of 2018   S.Gunaraja                                                                        ...

Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1495701385635307520?t=QB30l_OLCcN74lee6xNAMw&s=08 [2/21, 15:36] Sekarreporter 1: [2/21, 15:35] Sekarreporter 1: The CMM court, Egmore grants bail to 32 ABVP activists who were arrested for picketing TN CM house granted bail.

Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1495701385635307520?t=QB30l_OLCcN74lee6xNAMw&s=08 [2/21, 15:36] Sekarreporter 1: [2/21, 15:35] Sekarreporter 1: The CMM court, Egmore grants bail to 32 ABVP activists who were arrested for picketing TN CM house granted bail.

[2/21, 15:36] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1495701385635307520?t=QB30l_OLCcN74lee6xNAMw&s=08 [2/21, 15:36] Sekarreporter 1: [2/21, 15:35] Sekarreporter 1: The CMM court, Egmore grants bail to 32 ABVP activists who were arrested for picketing TN CM house granted bail. [2/21,...

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Suo Motu Contempt Petition No.3 of 2022 — Mr.M.P.Balasubramanian, M.A., B.L., Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore.	.. Contemnor Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings initiated against the Contemnor herein as per the order of the Court, dated 04.01.2022 made in W.M.P.No.27972 of 2021 in W.P.No.4359 of 2020. For contemnor :  M/s.V.Sudha  ORDER (The Order of the Court was made by The

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Suo Motu Contempt Petition No.3 of 2022 — Mr.M.P.Balasubramanian, M.A., B.L., Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore. .. Contemnor Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings initiated against the Contemnor herein as per the order of the Court, dated 04.01.2022 made in W.M.P.No.27972 of 2021 in W.P.No.4359 of 2020. For contemnor : M/s.V.Sudha ORDER (The Order of the Court was made by The

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 17.02.2022 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Suo Motu Contempt Petition No.3 of 2022 — Mr.M.P.Balasubramanian, M.A.,...

Justice SM Subramaniam of Madras HC refuses to interfere with Canara Bank’s decision to review a punishment of reduction in rank imposed on a bank manager for causing loss of Rs.72 lakh. Reviewing authority was of the view that the offence required a harsher punishment     CORAM  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD)No.3047 of 2022 and WMP(MD)Nos.2662 & 2663 of 2022 Manimaran	…  Petitioner             Vs. 1.The Chief General Manager /    Reviewing Authority,

Justice SM Subramaniam of Madras HC refuses to interfere with Canara Bank’s decision to review a punishment of reduction in rank imposed on a bank manager for causing loss of Rs.72 lakh. Reviewing authority was of the view that the offence required a harsher punishment CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD)No.3047 of 2022 and WMP(MD)Nos.2662 & 2663 of 2022 Manimaran … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief General Manager / Reviewing Authority,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.02.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD)No.3047 of 2022 and WMP(MD)Nos.2662 & 2663 of 2022 Manimaran … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief General Manager /...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com