SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

THE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Ordinary Original Civil jurisdiction) O.A.No.                    2022 In the matter of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. And In the matter of agreement dated 11.05.2020 along with addendum agreement dated 13.11.2020 between

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 30, 2022

THE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Ordinary Original Civil jurisdiction) O.A.No.                    2022 In the matter of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. And In the matter of agreement dated 11.05.2020 along with addendum agreement dated 13.11.2020 between

IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Ordinary Original Civil jurisdiction) O.A.No.                    2022 In the matter of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. And In the matter of agreement dated 11.05.2020 along with addendum...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 30, 2022

          37.In the result, the Second Appeal deserves to be dismissed and accordingly, the Judgment and Decree of both the Courts below stands confirmed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to impose a consolidated exemplary cost (cost of litigation, compensatory cost and cost for causing delay) of a sum of Rs.50,000/- [Rupees Fifty Thousand only] payable by the appellant, 4th respondent, 5th respondent and the 11th respondent jointly and severally. The Execution Court is directed to effect delivery and handover possession of the suit property to the  respondents 1 to 3 on or before 27.4.2022 and submit a compliance report before this Court. THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH Second Appeal No.234 of 2014 and MP No.1 of 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ORDERS  RESERVED ON        :   21.03.2022 PRONOUNCING ORDERS ON  :   30.03.2022 Coram: THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH Second Appeal No.234 of 2014 and MP No.1 of 2014...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Anticipatory Bail petition of Daughter and Son-in-law of Former ADMK Minister Jayakumar came for argument before the Hon,Ble Justice Jagadish Chandira in Court hall:43 as item 29. Mr.A.Natarajan Senior advocate (Former State PP) appeared.

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 30, 2022

Anticipatory Bail petition of Daughter and Son-in-law of Former ADMK Minister Jayakumar came for argument before the Hon,Ble Justice Jagadish Chandira in Court hall:43 as item 29. Mr.A.Natarajan Senior advocate (Former State PP) appeared.

Today 30.03.2022 – Anticipatory Bail petition of Daughter and Son-in-law of Former ADMK Minister Jayakumar came for argument before the Hon,Ble Justice Jagadish Chandira in Court hall:43 as item 29. Mr.A.Natarajan Senior advocate (Former...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
மகளிர் போலீஸை தாக்கிய வழக்கில் குற்றவாளிக்கு நான்கு பிரிவுகளில் தலா ஒரு வருடம் என ( ஏக காலத்தில் அனுபவிக்க)தண்டனை, ரூ.4750 அபராதம். Counsel for the Complainant Ms.B.Aarathi, B.A., B.L., Special Public Prosecutor. .

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 30, 2022

மகளிர் போலீஸை தாக்கிய வழக்கில் குற்றவாளிக்கு நான்கு பிரிவுகளில் தலா ஒரு வருடம் என ( ஏக காலத்தில் அனுபவிக்க)தண்டனை, ரூ.4750 அபராதம். Counsel for the Complainant Ms.B.Aarathi, B.A., B.L., Special Public Prosecutor. .

J.F.No. 61 – Page Judicial Form No. 61 (Cr.R.P 106) IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHALIR NEETHIMANDRAM ALLIKULAM, CHENNAI – 600 003. Present : Thiru.T.H.Mohammed Farooq, M.A., M.L., Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Chennai...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Anticipatory Bail petition of Daughter and Son-in-law of Former ADMK Minister Jayakumar came for argument before the Hon,Ble Justice Jagadish Chandira in Court hall:43 as item 29. Mr.A.Natarajan Senior advocate (Former State PP) appeared

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 30, 2022

Anticipatory Bail petition of Daughter and Son-in-law of Former ADMK Minister Jayakumar came for argument before the Hon,Ble Justice Jagadish Chandira in Court hall:43 as item 29. Mr.A.Natarajan Senior advocate (Former State PP) appeared

Today 30.03.2022 – Anticipatory Bail petition of Daughter and Son-in-law of Former ADMK Minister Jayakumar came for argument before the Hon,Ble Justice Jagadish Chandira in Court hall:43 as item 29. Mr.A.Natarajan Senior advocate (Former...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
in view that the respondent no.2/complainant has herself made a statement before us that she has married the appellant and now living happily, we exercise our powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and to do complete justice in the matter, we quash the FIR dated 16.08.2020 lodged by the respondent no.2 against the appellant under Sections 417, 420 and 376 IPC. The appeal stands allowed accordingly

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 30, 2022

in view that the respondent no.2/complainant has herself made a statement before us that she has married the appellant and now living happily, we exercise our powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and to do complete justice in the matter, we quash the FIR dated 16.08.2020 lodged by the respondent no.2 against the appellant under Sections 417, 420 and 376 IPC. The appeal stands allowed accordingly

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.456 OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP(Criminal) No. 9568 of 2021) JATIN AGARWAL APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR. RESPONDENTS O R...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version