SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

கூடுதல்தலைமை* *வழக்கறிஞர்* ( *ஒருங்கிணைப்பு* ) என்ற உயர் பொறுப்பை ஏற்கும் _மதிப்பிற்குரிய_  _அண்ணன்_ *ஜெ.ரவீந்திரன்*  

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 10, 2022

கூடுதல்தலைமை* *வழக்கறிஞர்* ( *ஒருங்கிணைப்பு* ) என்ற உயர் பொறுப்பை ஏற்கும் _மதிப்பிற்குரிய_  _அண்ணன்_ *ஜெ.ரவீந்திரன்*  

[4/10, 10:04] jp dmk: இந்தியத் திருநாடு போற்றும் நல்லாட்சி நாயகர் நமது *மாண்புமிகு* *தமிழக* *முதல்வர்* அவர்களின் தலைமையிலான அரசு தமிழக சட்டமன்றத்தில் இயற்றும் சட்டங்களையும் மக்கள் நலன் சார்ந்த திட்டங்களையும் மக்கள் மன்றத்திற்கு கொண்டு செல்ல இடையூறாக நீதிமன்றங்களில் தொடுக்கப்படும் அரசியல் மற்றும் சமூக...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
FREE WORKSHOP* 🔥 *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE/ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *SUBJECT* : *HOW TO CRACK JUDICIAL EXAM.*

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 10, 2022

FREE WORKSHOP* 🔥 *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE/ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *SUBJECT* : *HOW TO CRACK JUDICIAL EXAM.*

🔥 *FREE WORKSHOP* 🔥 *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE/ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *SUBJECT* : *HOW TO CRACK JUDICIAL EXAM.* *Date*: *10 APRIL 2022*🔥 *Timing*: 11.00am to 12.30pm Thanks and regards...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
GR swaminathan j The Madras High Court(Madurai Bench) has recently observed that a counsel has a professional duty to exercise their right of re-examination for upholding the cause of their clients. The Bench of Justice G.R Swaminathan made this observation

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 10, 2022

GR swaminathan j The Madras High Court(Madurai Bench) has recently observed that a counsel has a professional duty to exercise their right of re-examination for upholding the cause of their clients. The Bench of Justice G.R Swaminathan made this observation

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.03.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD) No.80 of 2010 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2010 B.Amudha       …  Appellant -vs- Rajendran (Died) Amsavalli The Sub Registrar,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh allowed an appeal assailing the order of Uttarakhand High Court, which permitted the writ petition filed IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SANJAY KISHAN KAUL; M.M. SUNDRESH, JJ. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2661 OF 2015; April 07, 2022 State of Uttarakhand Versus Sudhir Budakoti & Ors.

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 9, 2022

Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh allowed an appeal assailing the order of Uttarakhand High Court, which permitted the writ petition filed IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SANJAY KISHAN KAUL; M.M. SUNDRESH, JJ. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2661 OF 2015; April 07, 2022 State of Uttarakhand Versus Sudhir Budakoti & Ors.

  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SANJAY KISHAN KAUL; M.M. SUNDRESH, JJ. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2661 OF 2015; April 07, 2022 State of Uttarakhand Versus Sudhir Budakoti & Ors. Uttar...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH SA.No.729 of 2016 and The Madras High Court has recently held that the Coparcenary rights are not taken away by the Hindu Succession Act 1956. In fact, it has been reiterated even after coming into force of the 2015 amendment.

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 9, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH SA.No.729 of 2016 and The Madras High Court has recently held that the Coparcenary rights are not taken away by the Hindu Succession Act 1956. In fact, it has been reiterated even after coming into force of the 2015 amendment.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS  DATED: 05.04.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH SA.No.729 of 2016 and CMP No.13872 of 2016 S.Sampoornam …Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant Vs. K.Shanmugam Santhakumar Amudha Amsa K.Mani …Defendants/Respondents/...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Therefore, the imposing of major penalty of removal of the petitioner from service vide order dated 26.04.2018 for the alleged past misconduct prior to the petitioner joining National Maritime Academy (NMA) is unsustainable. THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Nos.12768 & 12769 of 2018and W.M.P.Nos.14980 to 14983 of 2018

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 9, 2022

Therefore, the imposing of major penalty of removal of the petitioner from service vide order dated 26.04.2018 for the alleged past misconduct prior to the petitioner joining National Maritime Academy (NMA) is unsustainable. THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Nos.12768 & 12769 of 2018and W.M.P.Nos.14980 to 14983 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved On 10.01.2022 Pronounced On  01.04.2022 CORAM   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Nos.12768 & 12769 of 2018and W.M.P.Nos.14980 to 14983 of 2018 (Through Video Conferencing) Dr.P.Vijayan...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version